🎨 Artcow Ellen Woodbury / Pizzacake / Pizzacakecomic - A 40 year old webcomic artist, mother, porn star, misandrist, dramacow and Reddit celebrity. Threatens to sue her critics and cuckolds her husband. Female Andrew Dobson.

Okay, if we wanna talk politics, I at least want to talk about them in a way that's completely reasonable and shows just how bad of a person Ellen is.

Take for instance, the following exchange on Facebook.
(archive)
1773470068339.png
Stephanie here tells Pizzacake that she should stop judging people based on their political affiliation, because they share a lot of human traits and are very simillar in a lot of ways, then says (rightfully) that Ellen's a hypocrite for preaching against the values she represents.
In response, Ellen commits faulty generalization again.
A faulty generalization is an informal fallacy wherein a conclusion is drawn about all or many instances of a phenomenon on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon. It is similar to a proof by example in mathematics. It is an example of jumping to conclusions. For example, one may generalize about all people or all members of a group from what one knows about just one or a few people:

  • If one meets a rude person from a given country X, one may suspect that most people in country X are rude.
  • If one sees only white swans, one may suspect that all swans are white.
This was naturally followed by a swarm of Pizzacake fans bashing her.
1773470286620.png
...but let's look at Ellen's comment again.
1773470311077.png
Now, let's ignore the fact that, even if what Ellen said was true, she would still be commiting faulty generalization.
What did Stephanie actually post?
1773470366921.png
Linked is also a very good video summarising the situation from a legal standpoint.

Yes, what Ellen took as Stephanie defending an ICE agent, and, thus, proving that all of MAGA is trash...is her saying that she can't pass judgement on the defendant since he hasn't been declared guilty of murder in court yet and is, thus, pressumed innocent.

Ellen is, quite literally, against the article 11 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
1773470919866.png
Besides, "I like to get my head around the law first before making any rash decisions and say that the officer is out line and automatically assume they are guilty of murder without hearing from all sides of the argument," implies that Stephanie also agrees that the officer commited the act he is accused of.
They are on the same side.
 
I guess I missed one of Ellen’s amazing original comics she posted on Threads Wednesday. In my defense it is more forgettable formulaic slop with as much thought put into as the metaphor at the end of this sentence I was going to put here.

IMG_8444.jpeg
I don't watch White House press briefings, and of course this is a strawman, but isn't the WH's job to sort of defend the President's decisions?
 
Apologies for an unconventional question. I'm currently away from my PC for the weekend and I paused my work.

I've got only one question for you.

What do you have to do for it to qualify as "touching grass"?
 
Apologies for an unconventional question. I'm currently away from my PC for the weekend and I paused my work.

I've got only one question for you.

What do you have to do for it to qualify as "touching grass"?
I mean this in the kindest possible way, but anything that keeps one from asking questions like that. At least until they get back to their computer.
 
Ellen's art is legit worse than Sonichu because Sonichu at least was bad in a funny way. Ellen's art is just obnoxious. Like I've never wanted to hit a drawing before.
 
I actually ship Pizzacake and Stonetoss. Stonetoss is the rich independent charismatic guy and Pizzacake is the gal who is bored of her marriage... Despite their opposing ideologies, they can't help but indulge themselves in one another a little bit. They would make for an extremely hate-fueled whirlwind romance. Ellen's husband wouldn't mind either.
 
Apologies for an unconventional question. I'm currently away from my PC for the weekend and I paused my work.

I've got only one question for you.

What do you have to do for it to qualify as "touching grass"?
I think in the age where the internet can literally be on your phone or on a tablet it has to mean being offline and being actively doing something, outside
Thanks for the rudeness.
The reason I asked this is that I am not sure if I can classify this as touching grass or not.
Yeah, a lot of Kemono shit leaked and I plan to make a larger post on these when I have better conditions for it.
And the activity being done should not be FOR THE INTERNET GOONERS
 
The reason I asked this is that I am not sure if I can classify this as touching grass or not.
spring.png
Yeah, a lot of Kemono shit leaked and I plan to make a larger post on these when I have better conditions for it.
that is most DEFINITELY not touching grass

As for Ellen, it is truly amazing how someone who gets paid to do art can be so fucking bad at it.

Ellen-Draws-Like-An-Autistic-Child.png
Pay attention Ellen, you stupid bitch. This is a redline from someone with more professional credentials than you: by that I mean I took an art course once or twice, whereas you clearly have no idea what a vanishing point is.

1) This is gooner bait, you stupid slut. Accentuate the sway of the figure's back, emphasize the buttox, and tuck the tummy. I realize you modeled this on yourself, but remember you're a fat whore with no ass.

2) There are all these lines all over the place on her upper back that make no sense. The scapula looks like this. Don't just draw random lines everywhere if you don't know what you're doing.

3) Lengthen the upper arm to achieve better balance. Balance is a good watchword for all figure drawing.

4) What the fuck is this hand? You're drawing random lines all over the place again, Ellen.

5) Dainty little Cinderella toes on these clodhoppers she's got. Balance and proportions, Ellen.

6) Your face sucks. You drew the eyes over-large and over-emphasized the upper lip. It's like you're aping the classic Disney style with a dash of Kim Possible without understanding the underlying principles. Put down the Milt Kahl, pick up the Andrew Loomis.

7) This is my best guess at where the crown of her head should be; any lower and her face will look even worse. But remember to leave a gap between the crown and the top of the hair, otherwise the head looks lumpy and misproportioned. You did do a construction sketch, right?

8) The line between grass and bush is too subtle. It makes the full sense of setting confusing. If the bushes are further in the background, darken them (like I did) or lighten them. If the bushes are directly behind the figure, include shadows under them to establish structure. Overall, if your foreground and your background are the same color, it's best to keep them different saturations and luminosities.

9) You got lazy with the tree branches, they look like green doillies you slapped on the canvas. Take your time and establish multiple layers of branches with varying luminosities. My examble took me less than 5 minutes.

There's so many other issues, but I'm going to stop here because I'm not getting paid for this shit. I will not be doing this again because I don't do free art mentorships.
 
As for Ellen, it is truly amazing how someone who gets paid to do art can be so fucking bad at it.
[autistic screeching]
You covered all of it really well but I also wanted to add that

1. The shadows from (off screen) tree only exist on Ellen- the tree cover isn't effecting the grass at all. This makes her look like she has vitiligo, not being shaded
2. The grass occluding her body doesn't make any sense. Sure, it's perfectly reasonable that it'd be in front of her legs and feet, but how is the grass climbing up the side of her butt and into her asscrack(????) several inches off the ground when the grass by her baby feet is clearly very short?

The line between grass and bush is too subtle. It makes the full sense of setting confusing. If the bushes are further in the background, darken them (like I did) or lighten them. If the bushes are directly behind the figure, include shadows under them to establish structure. Overall, if your foreground and your background are the same color, it's best to keep them different saturations and luminosities.
3. Agreed, extremely discombobulating background. The fact that the we (the viewer) are somehow looking parallel with the horizon line (?) of the grassy plain while being at eye level with the clouds makes this look like we're either on top of a mountain or in some hellish pizzacakecomics rendition of Skyblock
 
3. Agreed, extremely discombobulating background. The fact that the we (the viewer) are somehow looking parallel with the horizon line (?) of the grassy plain while being at eye level with the clouds makes this look like we're either on top of a mountain or in some hellish pizzacakecomics rendition of Skyblock
Thanks for the mental image.
Here's your reward.
CutPaste_2026-03-15_10-57-12-951.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom