Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

The guy who can't afford a filling really thought he was going to get that coffee shop! He had it "under contract"! :story:
Russell thinks that because he showed interest in the property and had discussions with the seller, that it was automatically "under contract". It's very similar to this very lawsuit where he thinks that merely discussing a $200,000 payout amounts to an agreement.

He's done this before, several times. Off the top of my head he claimed he had an "unrecorded right" to the Green Lantern Brothel property in Ely, NV simply because he expressed an interest in purchasing it to the owner.

His lack of understanding of how contracts and agreements work is truly astonishing. It the elementary school playground mentality of "It's MINE because I saw it FIRST!!!"
 
He doesn't really grasp how this shit works. Why would they settle with a motion to dismiss coming nearly immediately? The outcome of the motion to dismiss basically determines the likely value of the case. He's already wasted enough of their time and money with his slurping and drooling that they have no real reason not to have the hearing.
What really jumps at me is that he is asking for the court to gauge "whether resolution is possible" between Russ and Viatron. But Russ has the number and email of Viatron's lawyers on record. He can just ask them himself if they would entertain settlement questions.
 
What really jumps at me is that he is asking for the court to gauge "whether resolution is possible" between Russ and Viatron. But Russ has the number and email of Viatron's lawyers on record. He can just ask them himself if they would entertain settlement questions.
But if he emails them, they can email harass him back with slanderous accusations of blackmail. Why would he facilitate more harassment by talking to opposing lawyer?

It's just really weird that every lawyer opposing Russ in a lolsuit is a cruel, evil, lying, non-neutral villain who accuses him of all kinds of malfeasance. What a bizarre coincidence.
 
On mobile so can't screencap but he might be lying about getting NEETbux: The motion claims he was found ineligible due to a "technical eligibility requirement" but the attachment only says he is eligible due to being terminated without sufficient evidence of misconduct.
 
On mobile so can't screencap but he might be lying about getting NEETbux: The motion claims he was found ineligible due to a "technical eligibility requirement" but the attachment only says he is eligible due to being terminated without sufficient evidence of misconduct.
How long was he working at ViaTRON? The rules vary by state but typically one has to work a minimum number of hours to qualify for unemployment. It's possible he hadn't worked enough to qualify, even if he was terminated without cause.
 

I find it hard to believe that even Rusty thinks this ploy will succeed. I think this represents nothing but abject desperation by rat face because he has found himself backed into a corner with literally nowhere to go.
 
His lack of understanding of how contracts and agreements work is truly astonishing. It the elementary school playground mentality of "It's MINE because I saw it FIRST!!!"
He's just pioneering new avenues of adverse possession law. Whether it's tranny room rental conversion, employment severance, eminent domain brothel acquisition, internet web sites, music competitions, or even famous lady parts - Russ is at the forefront of this exciting new field of law. The Brigham Young of Nevada.
 
From around December, 2024 to October 1st, 2025-ish (Russ complaints that the specific day changes between 1st and 6th, but I don't think that matters)
In Nevada, one must have been employed for the first four of the last five calendar quarters prior to filing the claim so unless he had another W-2 job prior to working for ViaTRON he would be ineligible for UI benefits because he hadn't worked enough.
 
It's just really weird that every lawyer opposing Russ in a lolsuit is a cruel, evil, lying, non-neutral villain who accuses him of all kinds of malfeasance. What a bizarre coincidence.
He's so retarded he literally believes that a lawyer, on the other side, being paid by the other side, is supposed to be "neutral." The complete retardation of being unable to understand the American adversarial system is flabbergasting. This is one of the few things even the rawest paralegal should be able to understand.
 
I find it hard to believe that even Rusty thinks this ploy will succeed. I think this represents nothing but abject desperation by rat face because he has found himself backed into a corner with literally nowhere to go.

Shit-Lips has pulled many, many, many stupid-ass stunts that anyone with an IQ above your average Learing Center Somali can tell you doesn't have a snowball's chance in the deepest, hottest pit in Hell of working out in his favor. He's got a terminal case of "Main Character Syndrome", along with low intelligence, clinical narcissism, bloated ego, and an unhealthy dash of Dunning-Kruger, so he believes every fucktarded plan he comes up with is a foolproof, sure thing. And this is all on top of the fact that he has never, ever, even once succeeded in any of his bumblefuck schemes. I mean, if he had been successful once and just keeps on going because he's convinced that he will inevitably succeed again, I could maybe understand. But he has a losing streak longer than my...well, let's just say he has a pathetically long losing streak. The guy can't take a hint or read the room at all, and he has completely destroyed his life and his reputation because of it (among other things).
 
Not ol' shit tooth Shitlips trying to squeeze a settlement out of the niggas he's suing... :lossmanjack:

>Make spurious complaint
>Get offer of $20K and a return to work date
>Instead ask for severance and $200K
>Employer says fuck off
>Bitch and moan that your counteroffer to your former employer doesn't invalidate the original offer
>Begin process of being formally evicted
>Sue former employer for an amount you said was insufficient
>Ask the Judge if they can convince the company you tried to extort to just maybe settle for giving you some money on the eve of your eviction because life has become quite difficult
>This is all happening against a backdrop of suing a Government official for not letting you unilaterally erect whorehouses in his back yard and suing a website for laughing at you
>???
>Plights
 
Shit-Lips has pulled many, many, many stupid-ass stunts that anyone with an IQ above your average Learing Center Somali can tell you doesn't have a snowball's chance in the deepest, hottest pit in Hell of working out in his favor. He's got a terminal case of "Main Character Syndrome", along with low intelligence, clinical narcissism, bloated ego, and an unhealthy dash of Dunning-Kruger, so he believes every fucktarded plan he comes up with is a foolproof, sure thing. And this is all on top of the fact that he has never, ever, even once succeeded in any of his bumblefuck schemes. I mean, if he had been successful once and just keeps on going because he's convinced that he will inevitably succeed again, I could maybe understand. But he has a losing streak longer than my...well, let's just say he has a pathetically long losing streak. The guy can't take a hint or read the room at all, and he has completely destroyed his life and his reputation because of it (among other things).
I mean at least the Learing Center Somalis were successful in getting government bucks, Russ fucks up a free $20,000 and continued employment.

IMG_1604.jpeg
 
In Nevada, one must have been employed for the first four of the last five calendar quarters prior to filing the claim so unless he had another W-2 job prior to working for ViaTRON he would be ineligible for UI benefits because he hadn't worked enough.

It may also just be wages were too low to qualify.

A quick search of NV UI benefits says:

You must have worked in Nevada during the past 12 months and have earned at least $400 in at least two quarters of the base period. The base period is the first four of the five completed calendar quarters immediately preceding your initial claim for benefits.

If he filed in December (2025Q4), then 5 completed quarters runs 2024Q3-2025Q3. Assume he was unemployed before starting ViaTRON in Dec 2024. That means he had no income in 2024Q3, and with only a month working in 2024Q4, he likely didn't meet the $400 minimum. To qualify for UI, he had to hit the $400 quarterly minimum twice during 2025Q1-3, which runs January-September 2025.

However, per his main complaint, he had "an approved accommodation for a flexible schedule while attending university". It's unclear whether this just means he works a full shift at odd hours ("new management has repeatedly questioned why I am present during certain hours"), or a reduced number of hours overall. He did allege that "Aaron had threatened me with demotion in August to 'accommodate' my schedule" and whines about co-workers who had Fridays off. That suggests it wasn't a full time schedule, or it was so few hours that multiple managers commented on it.

So it's possible that, for two separate quarters, Greer slacked off enough, or his managers cut his hours enough, that he didn't meet the $400 threshold. After his Styrofoam fort got dismantled, he probably came in even less. He certainly took off enough time to drive to Winnemucca for meetings, plus his school work, plus his walks in the desert, plus pilgrimages to shuttered brothel sites.

Also, he specifically complains about "technical eligibility requirement requiring sufficient weekly earnings, which Plaintiff did not meet". I can't get search engines, AI, or the NV sites themselves to give me any useful info about weekly earnings. But if there is some such calculation, I could easily see Russ missing it if he was taking multiples days a week off, like his co-workers.

Can't prove it with the info in the lawsuit just yet. And as always, it's possible that lying Greer is a liar who lies, and the "technical" problem is he messed something up himself.
 
Last edited:
Why? Here's why:
2026-03-26-000425.png
Russell. They offered you $20,000. You then tried to extort them for $200,000. How do I know this? Because YOU made it a matter of public record. Thank you.

And this is all on top of the fact that he has never, ever, even once succeeded in any of his bumblefuck schemes.
We don't actually know this. I can imagine maybe a small business or amateur landlord being sent one of of his screeds and giving him $500 to fuck off or agreeing not to pursue debts if he just goes away. He's milked his disability to the max and is quite happy to threaten and blackmail* as he sees fit. Your average Joe knows nothing about civil law but does understand disability discrimination is bad for business.

*In writing, obviously. He's a complete coward in person.
 
Back
Top Bottom