Professor WGA and Friends Guide to Science - How to counter the TransEthics, TransLifeLife and hack writers in the Rat King

The latest blog post on this page is fascinating; the account of a mother whose daughter is a bit of a "seeker", who seems to mindmeld with whatever diagnosis she's currently after. Friend had an eating disorder? She developed bulimia. Still felt out of place? BPD diagnosis. She didn't like the BPD diagnosis, so convinced herself she had gender dysphoria and was "non-binary". Still didn't like the bpd diagnosis, she was autistic, complete with new stimming behaviors at 16. Godbear bless the autist doctors, who were the only professionals in this whole story that said "yeah, you're not autistic, you're just kind of needy."

Then she finally got her act together around age 18, enrolled in University, is a weird and bookish but otherwise normal young woman. This is what happens to the majority of youths seeking help, if the medical teams don't let them drive. And she was given almost every diagnosis she craved, except for autism. When that was withheld, and she got into a structured college prep course, she got better.

Here's an article intended to be a resource after the closure of the CAMH Gender Identity Clinic. Its a collection of the child gender study results by Dr. James Cantor. The studies took place between 1972 and 2013, and the results are telling: the vast majority of the children are either regular gay males or lesbian females, or straight and confirmed in their birth gender. This has been proven over 3 decades of research; the thing that changed by 2008 was that trans activists were narcissistically injured by these results and demanded they be scrapped for a system more pleasing to their anxiety.
Screen Shot 2017-07-09 at 12.27.03 PM.png
Screen Shot 2017-07-09 at 12.27.14 PM.png


The Wallien, M. S. C., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2008) study and the Steensma, T. D., McGuire, J. K., Kreukels, B. P. C., Beekman, A. J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2013) study are quite different from all previous results; can anyone pull them so we can check them out?

Lastly, something Dr. Zucker did at CAMH was to encourage the parents not to push their own agendas and assumptions on to their child. When a child says "I hate my penis", you have to ask them questions about what it is they hate about penises and their penis, not immediately assume they're trans and need treatment for that. Does their penis hurt? Are their clothes too tight? Has someone touched their penis? Do they feel sexual urges and they don't like it? Do they associate penises with some kind of male action that upsets them (anger, poor emotional behavior, etc)?

Can we grab this article? "Ethical Concerns About Emerging Treatment Paradigms for Gender Dysphoria."

Another doctor whose work may be worth looking into: Dr. Eric Vilain (that last name is gonna trigger the troons like whoa). He's the guy who actually checks down to the genetic level and has seen there are not 57 genders.
Screen Shot 2017-07-09 at 12.47.24 PM.png


Quote from Dr. Vilain:
Screen Shot 2017-07-09 at 12.44.10 PM.png
 
Here's a study within the article, on transgender being innately biological verses a psychological condition.
View attachment 245257

This is one of the weird things about academic studies - 70% or more of the subjects demonstrate that transgenderism is social and not biological? Better conclude the opposite, because at most 30% of subjects did indicate a biological root.
View attachment 245258

This is one of the reports that @Jaimas was talking about where the results may be skewed to a social bent. YMMV on these. But it's good to have it to look at and dissect with honesty.
 

The doctor's original article should be linked too.

Gender Dysphoria in Children and Suppression of Debate

Gender dysphoria (GD) of childhood describes a psychological condition in which a child experiences marked incongruence between his experienced gender and the gender associated with his biological sex. When this occurs in the prepubertal child, GD resolves in the vast majority of patients by late adolescence. Currently there is a vigorous albeit suppressed debate among physicians, therapists, and academics regarding what is fast becoming the new treatment standard for GD in children. Modeled after a paradigm developed in the Netherlands, it involves pubertal suppression with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists followed by the use of cross-sex hormones—a combination that will result in the sterility of minors. A review of the current literature suggests that this protocol is rooted in an unscientific gender ideology, lacks an evidence base, and violates the long- standing ethical principle of “First do no harm.”
 
This is one of the reports that @Jaimas was talking about where the results may be skewed to a social bent. YMMV on these. But it's good to have it to look at and dissect with honesty.

A good example of this in action was really, really apparent during GG's heyday. It's kind of long, but for the purposes of discussing how these studies get misused by ideologues, it might be a good thing to check out:

During GG, every one of the "Gamers are Dead" articles linked to a Tumblr article by one Dan Golding, basically using it as the central citation in their "Gamers are Over" horse-shit. Dan Golding, it turns out, works for a think-tank known as DIGRA, which originally started as a group that studied video games and electronic trends from a clinical perspective and was actually quite well-renown, before it was captured by third-wave feminist ideologues around 2008.

One of the studies used by DIGRA to push the need for representation in video games was one that wound up proving, ironically, the exact opposite. In this particular case, the study flat-out disproved the need for gender representation in video gaming. This wasn't the answer that they wanted, so the creator of the study wound up basically doing it again, citing the previous study despite the fact that it flat-out disproved their original talking points and claiming it did anyway. This was done to begin a push towards forcing Game Devs to get on board the diversity bandwagon.

In this example, we can see a pretty cut-and-dry case of a group with an ideological agenda deciding, apropos of nothing, that facts do not apply. By basically altering the wording, they essentially used data that openly disproved their talking point to state that their point was proven. You can see this shit all the fucking time in Social Justice-based studies, alongside citations that have absolutely nothing to do with what they're claiming they do.

Take this behavior to its logical extreme, and you get shit like the infamous UN CVAWG Report.
 
Anecdotal, but still:

fs3kiujyzn8z.png


On leaving the trans cult

The fact that some “trans women” are violent, misogynist men who make no attempt to try to blend in with other women really destroys the “brain sex” theory and the “born in the wrong body” theory. These men are clearly not women. It doesn’t make any sense that such men try to convince everyone that they’re women. The only explanation possible for violent, misogynist men claiming to be women is so they can get into women’s spaces to prey on us and so they can get cookies and attention. It’s obvious their real goal is to infiltrate when you look at their activism. They make no attempt to create spaces for trans women or to advocate for shelters, employment and housing for trans women. All they do is try to get into women-only spaces. And they are indeed getting lots of attention from the media, the medical profession, and from gender activists.

Transgender Reality

In these groups, teenagers who feel uncomfortable with their bodies and adults with depression and anxiety are coached–yes, coached–into thinking the source of their discomfort is a lifelong dysphoria that can only be corrected via sterilizing cross-sex hormones and, often, disfiguring surgeries.

You may not believe that this coaching or recruitment happens, or maybe you’ve already had experience with it. Either way, this blog aims to show evidence that transgender groups online are actively recruiting children, pressuring children and young adults to make irreversible bodily changes as young as possible, and turning them away from any family members or friends who do not support every aspect of transgender ideology.

While many transgender people in the offline world just want to live their lives quietly and free from interference, transgender ideology online is rapidly showing indications of becoming a cult, complete with suicides for the cause and self-mutilation and castration. If you are a parent of a newly gender questioning or transgender teenager, you need to be aware of what these online transgender groups are telling your child:

  • That their current discomfort with their growing, changing body means they will never be happy without hormones and possibly surgeries
  • That their natural puberty is poisoning their body and will prevent them from ever becoming the person they want to be
  • That normal childhood transgressions of gender norms (a boy playing with dolls, for instance) indicates a lifelong desire to be the opposite sex
  • That suicide can be preferable to starting hormones after puberty
  • That suicide can be a valid political act, or a good way to show parents and others that the transgender movement or your pronoun choice is serious
  • That being aroused by wearing women’s clothing means you are transgender and require a lifetime of hormone therapy and possible surgeries
  • That parents who “misgender” their child or call them by a name or pronoun other than their chosen one are being abusive and/or forcing their child to kill him or herself
  • That teens and young adults should stop listening to anyone in their life who expresses concern over their transition or believes they may be fixating on gender transition for the wrong reasons

This blog will show evidence for this and so much more that you won’t believe until you see it. This is the real face of transgender activism online. This is what your child got sucked into. We’ll talk about deprogramming tips, later, too, but for now, this is our advice:

If your child thinks he or she is transgender, get them away from the internet and back into reality. Whether your child decides to go through with transition or not, the ideology of transgender activism online is toxic and leads to depression, self-harm, and suicide.
 
Here's a study within the article, on transgender being innately biological verses a psychological condition.
View attachment 245257

This is one of the weird things about academic studies - 70% or more of the subjects demonstrate that transgenderism is social and not biological? Better conclude the opposite, because at most 30% of subjects did indicate a biological root.

Its even worse than that.

Assuming this wasn't a separated twins study, it shows that 70%+ showed no biological influence, while 30% could just have easily been social, as correlation is not causation.

The twins who were both trans were brought up by the same family I presume?

I checked the link and as they were self selecting and knew they were "trans twins" its pretty obvious they were raised in the same environment.

So this study shows that in 30% of families you can influence all your children into becoming trans, while in 70% of families your only batting a 1 in 2 average.
 
A conversation where an actual scientist debunks troon pseudo-biology, their "but intersex people!1!" and troons have opposite sex brains argument:

https://trannosphere.tumblr.com/post/162694774586/debunking-trans-ideological-pseudo-biology-links
Large pictures and lots of science :
troon ally spews troon pseudo science:
2zKwKyf.jpg


The intersex argument and using animals (!) to explain that human biology:
fr9rb9m.jpg


Shitlord Scientist explains how the real world works:
clDpA68.jpg

dH5RGTG.jpg

Dicks dicks dicks
BhkL8jc.jpg


More troon "arguments" and Scientist is having none of it:
ZY9nO6r.jpg

igGxOOB.jpg

TF4FeX2.jpg

Qrv2TLt.jpg
 
Last edited:
Also for every troon who claims an inverted penis is the same as an actual vagina:
https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2180-9-102
microflora of the penile skin-lined neovagina in male-to-female transsexuals

They found lots of poop bacteria, mold (!) and other stuff actual women get infections from.

Also THIS: Although this was not a study criterion and therefore not scored, a foul smell of the vagina was observed in most patients.
Dickholes smell gross. No wonder if you look at the bacteria they found:

Quotes:


Based on Gram stain the majority of smears revealed a mixed microflora that had some similarity with bacterial vaginosis (BV) microflora and that contained various amounts of cocci, polymorphous Gram-negative and Gram-positive rods, often with fusiform and comma-shaped rods, and sometimes even with spirochetes.

On average 8.6 species were cultured per woman. The species most often found were: Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus anginosus group spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Corynebacterium sp., Mobiluncus curtisii and Bacteroides ureolyticus. Lactobacilli were found in only one of 30 women.

There was however a highly significant correlation between the presence of E. faecalis on the one hand and sexual orientation and coitus on the other (p = 0.003 and p = 0.027 respectively).
(that means gay troons had more poop inside their dickholes)

There was however a highly significant correlation between the presence of E. faecalis and sexual orientation: in heterosexual transsexual women (having a male partner) E. faecalis was present in 78.6% while it was only present in 14.2% of homosexual transsexual women and in 12.5% of bisexual transsexual women (p = 0.003). Equally there was a significant correlation between E. faecalis and the occurrence of regular coitus with a male partner: in those having regular coitus E. faecalis was present in 75% while in only 25% of those not having coitus (p = 0.027).

Conclusion:
Our study is the first to describe the microflora of the penile skin-lined neovagina of transsexual women. It reveals a mixed microflora of aerobe and anaerobe species usually found either on the skin, in the intestinal microflora or in a BV microflora

the environment of this penile skin-lined neovagina, does not support the growth of lactobacilli
(stuff actual vaginas have). This might be due to the absence of glycogen rich epithelial cells and to the absence of lactobacillus epithelial binding sites that are upregulated by oestrogen in the normal vaginal mucosa.

No proper advice can be given at present with regard to optimal vaginal hygiene in transsexual women.

So these guys are stuck with stinky inverted dicks.

Also here a dickhole picture:
neovag12.gif
 
There was however a highly significant correlation between the presence of E. faecalis and sexual orientation: in heterosexual transsexual women (having a male partner) E. faecalis was present in 78.6% while it was only present in 14.2% of homosexual transsexual women and in 12.5% of bisexual transsexual women (p = 0.003). Equally there was a significant correlation between E. faecalis and the occurrence of regular coitus with a male partner: in those having regular coitus E. faecalis was present in 75% while in only 25% of those not having coitus (p = 0.027).

Hypothesis: MTF troons are 5.5 times more likely to take it up the butt, thus spreading E. faecalis from the rectum to the neovagina.

#analrips indeed
 
Assuming this wasn't a separated twins study, it shows that 70%+ showed no biological influence, while 30% could just have easily been social, as correlation is not causation.
Yeah, I'd really like to get into the data; it's obvious that the conclusion doesn't match the data due to bias and forcing the data to match the hypothesis (and doing a laughably terrible job since even laypeople without data access can see the issues with the conclusion.)

Do these troon apologists have to hand in the data set along with the paper? If so we might be able to take a closer look.

edit:
troon ally spews troon pseudo science:

Tatiana needs to get in this thread immediately.
 
Last edited:
A paper produced in the 1980s in Denmark. The writer is Thorkin Søensen.

This covers narcissism in the transvestite and transsexual mindsets.

The importance of a careful phenomenologic elucidation of the condition is emphasized as a necessary precondition of the diagnostic demarcation, of creating the necessary contact with the transsexual, and necessary as a starting point for a therapeutic effort. The phenomenologic difference between the two transsexual sexes is emphasized by comparison with two narcissistic character types, both described by Wilhelm Reich– the passive feminine character and the phallic narcissistic character. Both the transsexual male and female are characterized by an insecure gender identity. The transsexual male reacts to this insecurity and anxiety by withdrawing to conceptions of living in a submissive over-aesthetical femininity. Aggressive and libidinal powers are pushed away from the consciousness, resulting in the often observed pseudo-femininity in transsexual males. The transsexual female, on the other hand, seeks to subdue a similar insecure gender identity by obtaining ego-satisfaction in adoption of strong outer attitudes and actions. She takes on a caricatured masculine attitude. It is shown how these phenomena are reflected in the sexual area. The transsexual man does not find the sexual genital satisfaction important, while the transsexual woman, on the contrary, is genitally fixated and preoccupied with sexual display.

Wew lads and laddies. Read that whole spoiler. It seems Søensen predicted modern day issues.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb00573.x/full
 
Hi, first time here,

Unless you have ethical issue using it, sci-hub will get through almost any paywall to access peer reviewed research papers. You have access to much more content than researchgate.

After reading the thread, I cant remember seeing any papers by Paul McHugh. He is one of the most renown psychiatrist of the 20th century. He is probably the most important expert in the field. The Tranz tried to marginalize his message but so far they were not able to shut him up. He worked at the John Hopkins sex reassignment surgery for years. From one of his opinion piece: ``At Johns Hopkins, after pioneering sex-change surgery, we demonstrated that the practice brought no important benefits. As a result, we stopped offering that form of treatment in the 1970s. Our efforts, though, had little influence on the emergence of this new idea about sex, or upon the expansion of the number of “transgendered” among young and old. `` from http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/06/15145/ .

Him and Lawrence Mayer (Mayer is a very accomplished biostatisticien) published together a literature review on the subjet. There is an executive summary that is quite handy is one does not want to go through the whole article. One thing that I find very sad and actually dont remember seeing in any scientific publication prior is this :

``In the course of writing this report, I consulted a number of individuals who asked that I not thank them by name. Some feared an angry response from the more militant elements of the LGBT community; others feared an angry response from the more strident elements of religiously conservative communities. Most bothersome, however, is that some feared reprisals from their own universities for engaging such controversial topics, regardless of the report’s content — a sad statement about academic freedom.``http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/executive-summary-sexuality-and-gender

Another few people who really were pummeled by the trans are Micheal Bailey who wrote the Man who would be Queen. He is a journalist that made more available the research of Ray Blanchard on autogynophilia (fetichist men turn on by wearing women clothes). The scholar Alice Dreger who wrote a defense of Bailey got also caught in the rampage. She resigned her position after being censored. You can find her story here: http://alicedreger.com/in_fear .

I am sorry I did not have the time to read all the material posted and analyse it in details but I thought you might find these few additions useful.
 
To pursue on the idea of narcissic rage brought before by another poster, I think the paper by Anne Lawrence is pretty juicy.
Lawrence, Anne A. "Gender assignment dysphoria in the DSM-5." Archives of sexual behavior 43.7 (2014): 1263-1266.
``Here is what I hypothesize: Some persons with GD— especially a vocal group of late-transitioning MtF transsexual activists—do not like being reminded that they have chosen to live in a gender role that is inconsistent with their biologic sex. They appear to experience such reminders as inflicting narcissistic injury (Kohut, 1972; see also Lawrence, 2008). They seemingly would prefer to believe that their biologic sex is indeterminate, arbitrary, or unimportant, that they suffer from some subtle, undiagnosed neurologic intersex condition, or both. These activists would predictably applaud the implication—inherent in the wording of the new diagnostic criteria for GD—that by undergoing sex reassignment, they have merely cast off their original inappropriately assigned gender and taken on a new appropriately assigned gender that is congruent with their gender identity. This gender-focused reframing of their condition facilitates their denial of the unpleasant reality of their biologic sex.``

Also from am earlier paper by Anne Lawrence
Lawrence, Anne A. "Shame and narcissistic rage in autogynephilic transsexualism." Archives of Sexual Behavior 37.3 (2008): 457-461.

``In this essay, I argue that much of the MtF transsexual campaign against Bailey can be understood as a manifestation of narcissistic rage. It is no coincidence, I believe, that most of Bailey’s principal opponents fit the demographic pattern associated with nonhomosexual MtF transsexualism (see Lawrence, 2007). I propose that nonhomosexual (i.e., presumably autogynephilic) MtF transsexuals are probably at increased risk for the development of narcissistic disorders—significant disorders in the sense of self—as a consequence of the inevitable difficulties they face in having their cross-gender feelings and identities affirmed by others, both before and after gender transition. As a result, many autogynephilic transsexuals are likely to be particularly vulnerable to feelings of shame and may be predisposed to exhibit narcissistic rage in response to perceived insult or injury. ``

Now Anne Lawrence is a psychologist, sexologist and anesthesiologist who is also a transsexual. She wrote extensively on the subjet.
 
Back