- Joined
- Sep 13, 2018
It's because they are redditors and don't like the religion stuff in DS9.They seem far more enthused about Voyager than they did DS9, but I guess that's pretty common?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's because they are redditors and don't like the religion stuff in DS9.They seem far more enthused about Voyager than they did DS9, but I guess that's pretty common?
Mike would love Voyager because he has the taste of a tacky gay man.This is almost enough to make me try Voyager again. I don't think I've watch it all the way through since it originally aired on TV.
They seem far more enthused about Voyager than they did DS9, but I guess that's pretty common? People seem to either love DS9 and like the rest, or love the rest and like DS9.

I don't think that's it. I've spoken to other Trek fans in-person and, independently of each other, they always say "it didn't feel like Star Trek." The problem was that it's not set on a space ship and there's little to no exploration, which is a core theme of TOS, TNG, VOY, and ENT. You also need to watch DS9 and invest more time because there's more continuity - not that the other series lacked continuity, but you could not sit down and watch a single episode of DS9 the same way you could the other series.It's because they are redditors and don't like the religion stuff in DS9.
That's the feeling I've always got, both inside the show's universe and out of it. DS9 has its own vision of the Star Trek world ( for instance, until season 5, starship crews wore the TNG uniforms and the color-on-shoulders uniform was only for space station staff. This was ignored by the people making Generations and Voyager). And the production of DS9 seems to have taken place in a mostly drama-free bubble, unlike the other shows.DS9 was very different from Trek shows before and after it, making it a little controversial. It doesn't help that the cast and crew of other Trek series shit on DS9. Shatner is a legendary asshole, Stewart was openly hostile on set for the first season, Jeri Ryan slept with Brannon Braga to get her role, and so on. That gets swept under the rug, but DS9 and Brooks is the outlier that... produced seven seasons without any weird controversies, except for Terry Farrell getting fired because she wouldn't sleep with Rick Berman? People make shit up about Avery Brooks to this day.
Brooks keeping everything professional and serious may get mocked by other Trek cast, but it kept the show from going off the rails.That's the feeling I've always got, both inside the show's universe and out of it. DS9 has its own vision of the Star Trek world ( for instance, until season 5, starship crews wore the TNG uniforms and the color-on-shoulders uniform was only for space station staff. This was ignored by the people making Generations and Voyager). And the production of DS9 seems to have taken place in a mostly drama-free bubble, unlike the other shows.
I like DS9 but usually skip most of the first season. I recall at least these three major points RLM had about Voyager from the video: 1. S1 Voyager was stronger than S1 DS9, Voyager, 2. Voyager S1 was basically TNG episodes, and they would have had a fair hearing if they were TNG, 3. Voyager is most like Trek, a continuation of TOS - TNG - VOY. DS9 is the dissimilar one, not worse, but intentionally dissimilar.I don't think that's it. I've spoken to other Trek fans in-person and, independently of each other, they always say "it didn't feel like Star Trek." The problem was that it's not set on a space ship and there's little to no exploration, which is a core theme of TOS, TNG, VOY, and ENT. You also need to watch DS9 and invest more time because there's more continuity - not that the other series lacked continuity, but you could not sit down and watch a single episode of DS9 the same way you could the other series.
Another criticism of DS9 is that it explores the limits of the Federation. There is more political intrigue. Rather than a single rogue officer storyline (Maxwell in TNG), you had full-on conspiracies in DS9 (Leyton et al). The Federation hides its failures (e.g. the genetically enhanced rejects being institutionalized against their will). You even have Starfleet itself agreeing to manufacturing evidence to trick another power into supporting a war. Section 31 also rubbed a lot of people the wrong way.
DS9 was very different from Trek shows before and after it, making it a little controversial. It doesn't help that the cast and crew of other Trek series shit on DS9. Shatner is a legendary asshole, Stewart was openly hostile on set for the first season, Jeri Ryan slept with Brannon Braga to get her role, and so on. That gets swept under the rug, but DS9 and Brooks is the outlier that... produced seven seasons without any weird controversies, except for Terry Farrell getting fired because she wouldn't sleep with Rick Berman? People make shit up about Avery Brooks to this day.
I didn't think I was tacky.Mike would love Voyager because he has the taste of a tacky gay man.
I thought it was a nice pastiche of Americana.By season two you realize the show is kabuki theater. The cold open starts and Neelix walks in smiling like a pedophile teacher, today it's a daycare episode. We’re learning about sharing feelings! Every shuttlecraft Tuvok enters explodes. Tom shows up every week like, “guys I made a 1950s drive-in theater on the holodeck,” like he thinks Elvis is underground music.
That's all Trek though.After a while your brain just goes numb because you can predict the entire episode from the teaser.
Kek, my sides.Noncelix
TNG had the seeds for those plot lines: the blue gills, the kids on Darwin Station, the various admirals that went rogue (by usually not doing anything wrong), the multiple times some random admiral comes aboard to pick apart the ship and crew, the times Starfleet wanted to recruit members of the senior staff for more nefarious purposes and so and so on.Another criticism of DS9 is that it explores the limits of the Federation. There is more political intrigue. Rather than a single rogue officer storyline (Maxwell in TNG), you had full-on conspiracies in DS9 (Leyton et al). The Federation hides its failures (e.g. the genetically enhanced rejects being institutionalized against their will). You even have Starfleet itself agreeing to manufacturing evidence to trick another power into supporting a war. Section 31 also rubbed a lot of people the wrong way.
The only good part of VOY S1 was James Sloyan
Shame he was paired up with Noncelix in most of his episode.


That's why Quark was so good. He is what he is and there's no tryhard bullshit.Why can’t he just be a hustler in space? That’s funnier and more believable.
It tickles me that the people who want the Federation to be real the hardest are the same ones who refuse to understand what needs to be done for something like the Federation to exist.Section 31 also rubbed a lot of people the wrong way.
Youre right, they need to balance it out with past ships that turn up in single episodes. Wheres the crew of Enterprise suddenly appearing in a beat up Ford pickupView attachment 8800720
Star Trek keeps teasing all these future Enterprises that show up for one episode. Quit blue balling me with timeships.
A few years ago I saw Sharon Lawrence in a tiny two-act play, and I had to fight the urge to start shouting "WAIT THERE'S A NAME TAG HERE: A. EARHART!"Youre right, they need to balance it out with past ships that turn up in single episodes. Wheres the crew of Enterprise suddenly appearing in a beat up Ford pickup
That was a really fun episode, the few sprinklings we got of past people seeing the future, trying to comprehend it were gemsA few years ago I saw Sharon Lawrence in a tiny two-act play, and I had to fight the urge to start shouting "WAIT THERE'S A NAME TAG HERE: A. EARHART!"
Remember that bastard that stole a time machine and tried to bullshit his way around Enterprise as a future historian

Frewer really brought in a lot of good sleezy energy to the character. His whole masquerade felt to paper thin.Turns out he’s just some grifter from New Jersey, which is great. His master plan would’ve crashed and burned even if Picard hadn’t outsmarted him, how the hell do you explain building a shuttlecraft, phasers and a fully functional life-size positronic android in your garage?
View attachment 8800858
Robin Williams passed on the role, but Matt Frewer is such a good understudy, he reminds you of Jim Carrey but without the baggage.
Braxton running his mouth at Janeway is pretty rich. Considering his dumb ass bailed out of his timeship. Then some desert-dwelling Bill Gates found it while high on peyote.Frewer really brought in a lot of good sleezy energy to the character. His whole masquerade felt to paper thin.
What is with time travelers losing their ships to people in the past?

Didnt he flip out because of himself in the end, setting up a loop of his own stupidity and losing his own job?Braxton running his mouth at Janeway is pretty rich. Considering his dumb ass bailed out of his timeship. Then some desert-dwelling Bill Gates found it while high on peyote.
View attachment 8800979