Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

I thought he was scared of corresponding with Hardin (I believe he has declared such previously in Greee Vs. Kiwifarms, a website).
I think the point is that he'll email Miss Padua asking for a hot date and get a response that all future hot dates are with Hardin, and then he'll explode (he won't, he doesn't read his email unless he wants to).
 
There's no way the guy who filed Greer v Hardin would let attorney substitution go un-sperged at, either here or on GvM. Unless Hardin himself emailed to announce, I don't think Russ knows.

I really, REALLY hope the first time Russ finds out is live during the settlement hearing on May 7th.
 
There's no way the guy who filed Greer v Hardin would let attorney substitution go un-sperged at, either here or on GvM. Unless Hardin himself emailed to announce, I don't think Russ knows.

I really, REALLY hope the first time Russ finds out is live during the settlement hearing on May 7th.
How did the judge put it? "Ignore your emails at your own risk"?
 
Don't you think he would have/did?
I'm 50/50 on this. I think Hardin, as a professional attorney, would immediately email his opponent to do introductions and ask for a small delay to get up to speed.

However I also think Hardin, world's foremost specialist in lolcow law, relentless Greer antagonist, subject of multiple motions to disqualify, briefly a defendant in Greer v Hardin, and recent recipient of a rejected motion on the grounds of "judges believe Greer knows to check his email"... may very well have held off in this one case, to make a point about email checking. I honestly think it's a coin flip.
 
I'm 50/50 on this. I think Hardin, as a professional attorney, would immediately email his opponent to do introductions and ask for a small delay to get up to speed.

However I also think Hardin, world's foremost specialist in lolcow law, relentless Greer antagonist, subject of multiple motions to disqualify, briefly a defendant in Greer v Hardin, and recent recipient of a rejected motion on the grounds of "judges believe Greer knows to check his email"... may very well have held off in this one case, to make a point about email checking. I honestly think it's a coin flip.
Or better yet, he did send an email, but the subject line was deliberately worded in a way that made Greer immediately dismiss it.
 
"Good News Mr. Greer"
“US Customs has held your shipment”
“My husband has died and left all of his millions to you”
“I have all of your personal photos and unless you send me eleven billion bitcoin I’ll publish them”

Oh, who am I kidding. Russ would absolutely fall for any of these scams. (Not to mention Hardin would never because ethics)
 
Could it be a conflict of interest that if Hardin loses the ViaTRON case and Russ gets his $220,000, he would then actually have money to collect for Null's counterclaim and legal fees?
I believe both parties are aware they're unlikely to get paid in full and have come to an agreement. It only becomes a full blown conflict of interest if both parties win and then want to fight over it.
It worked for Afroman. The judge in that case could barely conceal his seething when the jury came back in Afroman's favor. And that was a bunch of white folk in a podunk county somewhere in Buttfuck Ohio.
It helped that Afroman was both right and sympathetic to the point even a pretty obviously biased judge couldn't rig it against him.
 
Last edited:
I believe both parties are aware they're unlikely to get paid in full and have come to an agreement. It only becomes a full blown conflict of interest if both parties win and then want to fight over it.

It helped that Afroman was both right and sympathetic to the point even a pretty obviously biased judge couldn't rig it against him.
But that's not a conflict or issue regarding Hardin. Hardin's job is to win the judgements for his clients. Collecting it is their problem.
 
23 pages
Screenshot 2026-04-21 004004.png
Screenshot 2026-04-21 004259.png
 

Attachments

And then she ruins it again after actually making a little bit of an argument that a judge might actually consider and again asks the judge to consider arguments and their factual basis.
That's why the judge suggest a motion for summary judgment was more appropriate. Generally any reference outside the "four corners of the complaint," such as citations to fact or including exhibits (other than a very specific kinds), converts a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. There's an exception for contracts that are the subject of the complaint, but this case also has a defamation claim and an IIED claim.
 
Last edited:
HOW can Hardin be in good standing with the State Bar when Russell has threatened multiple times that he might possibly potentially file bar complaints against him?
 
Who knows whether Greer's colleagues loathed him and laughed at his facial deformities or whether he was just imagining it?

(Those hot office wammen won't suck me my penis. It's because they think I'm the elephant man. They're laughing at me. I want a screen!")
Remember he routinely lies and exaggerates, like describing saying no to him as "screaming" at him.
 
You're not wrong about that, but it hasn't stopped Hardin from corresponding with him, nor should it.

Hardin can email Greer all he wants, but he can't make Greer read those emails. Even if Russ does decide to open one, there's a good chance that he confuses it as being related to Greer v. Moon and still fails to realize what's happened. Hardin has shown a few email exhibits in Greer v. Moon where he's been trying to contact Russ for several weeks or months regarding some matter without any response. That doesn't prove that Greer wasn't reading those emails, but Greer himself has submitted exhibits showing unread email (which could be easily fabricated) so until something hits the docket there's no real way to know.

If Greer is aware of it, he still might not say anything about it until it's too late for him to do anything about it other than submit a motion to undo the thing that has already happened.
 
Yes, and Geoff even said they contacted Aaron to try and confirm this little story and Aaron claims it's bullshit.
View attachment 8874112
Of course it's my opinion that Viatron is just as likely to be lying about shit as Greer so who the hell knows, but Greer is the one making the claim so it's on him to prove it. If he had any emails from Aaron approving the barrier, he would've included them. I hope we eventually see Viatron submitting emails from their side of things, showing whatever warnings and disciplinary contacts they had with our boy.
I have no difficulty beleving that Ratface would turn a shared office space into a filthy rat's nest.
 
Back
Top Bottom