Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

RodgerDodger said:
I await the inevitable day that Greer sues his representation for incompetence. It might be a case he might win.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that end up in a pro se paradox?

Let's say he wins that case, then that would mean his representation is not incompetent.
But if he loses that case and his representation is not incompetent, then his representation is incompetent.
 
AnOminous said:
It actually shows how stupid Russhole is. He literally doesn't realize what he agreed to. He agreed to lose. That's how fucking dumb he is.
Click to expand...
Not just lose, but pay for it too.

As has been said with much frustration in the Greer V Moon thread, fee shifting isn't automatic in America, so even when Null finally wins he's unlikely to be awarded his costs and fees

But the ViaTRON stipulation specifically says the non-prevailing party pays the full price of mediation and reasonable attorney's fees, and Russ was willing to take that gamble because he's sure he'll win.
 
RodgerDodger said:
I await the inevitable day that Greer sues his representation for incompetence. It might be a case he might win.
Click to expand...
It will be better. Big companies love arbitration because they routinely get rid of nuisance claims like greeeeee. When Hardin ass fucks him raw without even a reach-around for his penis, Greee will file a motion to undo the thing that has already been done. Greeeee will claim that it was improper for the arbitrator not to consider Hardin's bullying in other suits and "use of the KF harassment site" b/c Gree was afraid that anything he presented to the arbitrator would make its way to the Farms. "No truly neutral arbitrator would have found against Plaintiff Greetard if he could have presented everything without fear of the big, bad Hardin sharing with his harassment friends."

And then he will motion to reconsider. Then he will appeal. The he will file a motion in Gree v moon to sanction Hardin for Nevada. And motion to reconsider.
 
AnOminous said:
He agreed to lose. That's how fucking dumb he is.
Click to expand...
And that is why he will forever remain my favorite lolcow. Sure, Bossmanjack has better meltdowns, Patrick Tomlinson makes for better memes, and other cows self-destruct more spectacularly. But no lolcow voluntarily agrees to screw themselves over quite like Russell.
 
Pee Cola said:
Have you never heard the phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"?
Click to expand...

Betonhaus said:
The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy, nothing more. Otherwise you get bullshit like gays simping for Islam.
Click to expand...
People have screwed up the quote, and by doing so have removed the meaning to take from it. It is supposed to be "The enemy of my enemy may be my ally". 'You might find someone to work with against a mutual enemy', not 'You have a guaranteed ally in your enemy's enemy'.
 
Random Troll said:
Wouldn't that end up in a pro se paradox?

Let's say he wins that case, then that would mean his representation is not incompetent.
But if he loses that case and his representation is not incompetent, then his representation is incompetent.
Click to expand...
The beauty is that Paradox would trap a Federal Judge in there with Greer for all eternity.
 
the khat quaffer said:
And if that doesn't work, he can bounce the case back to the Land Before Time and litigate from there. From then?

View attachment 8919232
Click to expand...
Spike would be a better litigator than Greee.

Honestly, I'm insulting Spike's intelligence by even making the comparison.

Kiwi Lime Pie said:
The unfortunate part is how this makes it harder for the handicapped people who are both able and willing to work - and do a good job - in some capacity if they were given the opportunity and a fair shake. All it takes is a single RG type person to ruin it for someone else.
Click to expand...
I have a few friends who are physically disabled, who nonetheless find a way to rise above those difficulties and *want* to be treated like everyone else, participate in society and do a good job at honest work. The fact that narcissistic fucks like Greee incentivize a world that is harder for people like my friends is one of many factors in my disdain for him.
 
Dong-Liquor said:
People have screwed up the quote, and by doing so have removed the meaning to take from it. It is supposed to be "The enemy of my enemy may be my ally". 'You might find someone to work with against a mutual enemy', not 'You have a guaranteed ally in your enemy's enemy'.
Click to expand...
I guess this would be a case of "blood is thicker than water", another oft-misquoted saying. Only it's drool instead of water.
 
the khat quaffer said:
I guess this would be a case of "blood is thicker than water", another oft-misquoted saying. Only it's drool instead of water.
Click to expand...
If you're referring to "the water of the womb" version, that's a back-formation that was invented in the late 1990s, with no attestation before then. "Blood is thicker than water" is a pre-christian proverb.
 
Harvey Danger said:
ViaTron correctly pointed out that Greer relying on his imagined payout doesn't count as a meeting of the minds or contract formation. He can't form and act on a contract unilaterally, which is clearly what he did. Hardin could argue that unilateral contract creation and formation is a hallmark of Greer lolsuits, going back to Swift and nearly every hooker-related one since. It's one of his most reliable traits.
Click to expand...
Russ, as typical, tries to have two things be true at once and both of them in his favor: he both asserts reliance as evidence of agreement AND tries to welch on the supposed agreement by going back for another bite at the apple.

I've had the displeasure of dealing with someone like this before. Have a dispute, half-hammer it out, they scoop the pot into their pile, claiming all you were potentially open to as "agreed" and ignoring the other parts or raising new ones, then attempt to reopen negotiations at the supposed new starting point, and lashing out when the hand goes up and says no. It's disingenuous, amoral, and immoral, and I'm glad each time he gets completely fucked by it. Someone above or in one of his other threads recently described him as having narcissistic traits and instincts but being too dumb for his cunning to work as he seems truly to believe he deserves. I think that hits the nail on the head.

Imagine the frustration of being too dumb to be successfully evil, of being so devotedly stupid you think you owned the rake when you step on it and it smacks you in the face.
 
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Russ, as typical, tries to have two things be true at once and both of them in his favor: he both asserts reliance as evidence of agreement AND tries to welch on the supposed agreement by going back for another bite at the apple.

I've had the displeasure of dealing with someone like this before. Have a dispute, half-hammer it out, they scoop the pot into their pile, claiming all you were potentially open to as "agreed" and ignoring the other parts or raising new ones, then attempt to reopen negotiations at the supposed new starting point, and lashing out when the hand goes up and says no. It's disingenuous, amoral, and immoral, and I'm glad each time he gets completely fucked by it. Someone above or in one of his other threads recently described him as having narcissistic traits and instincts but being too dumb for his cunning to work as he seems truly to believe he deserves. I think that hits the nail on the head.

Imagine the frustration of being too dumb to be successfully evil, of being so devotedly stupid you think you owned the rake when you step on it and it smacks you in the face.
Click to expand...
He's the world's most incompetent psychopath. (Looks around the cows of Kiwifarms) ok he's One of the world's most incompetent psychopaths.

The truly amazing thing is he's worse at it than Acerthorne and Yaniv.
 
DragoonSierra said:
But he did get him his penis sucked as a nuisance settlement from the Olive Garden incident.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that counts as it never went to court, not even whore's court. Hof just ordered one of his more addicted hookers to service the Brothel Prince or be cut off from her daily scag dose.

I believe it was lawsuits that @RodgerDodger is talking about.
 
The Un-Clit said:
I'm not sure that counts as it never went to court, not even whore's court. Hof just ordered one of his more addicted hookers to service the Brothel Prince or be cut off from her daily scag dose.
Click to expand...
I'm definitely calling CBS reps on Thursday. I smell a Divorce Court spinoff. Weekdays after Married with Children
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom