Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Boombers would never admit it, but I'm sure one of the main reasons why they're often NIMBYs is that allowing construction in their neighbourhoods would increase real estate supply and drive down property value including theirs.
 
Last edited:
The reasoning is that anyone can post in uspg2. It's not technically exclusively pro trump. Only reason a majority of posters here don't post in there is that it's just a waste of time. You're arguing with retards who refuse to look at any perspectives but their own. That's the main reason I don't bother with it, no discussion to be had. I've had better arguments with users in this thread where I've learned shit and had to change previously held positions. But I can still post in uspg2 if I wanted to.
Yeah but if you post anything other than saying that Donald Trump is a fit, hip, healthy, sexy, strong young alpha male, you'll come back in an hour to 30 replies saying how wrong you are and that you're a libtard for not wanting to get down on our knees and serve Donald Trump as your king
 
That's why boomers are the most delusional, despicable and ignorant class of people. Not all of them are and I would wager most aren't, but a sizable portion of them are fuckwits.
The younger generation have been paying insurmountable taxes which feeds into a security net to keep these fat fucks alive and breathing. They're a net negative on our healthcare system and on the real estate market because most of them are retarded nimby types. All the shitty zoning laws and rotting infrastructure is in part due to their pitiful existence.
I think we just need to have an honest both-sides conversation about how entitlements and generally von-bismarck-ian policies of welfare-state systems (or quasi-welfare-state systems) are no longer viable and need to be either sunsetted or reimagined from the ground up. My ideological differences with entitlement programs aside, they made much more sense when there were 5-10 workers per retiree and/or welfare recipient. When an average family just popped out more children. This is no longer the case, and the system needs to be re-thought ground up, because immigration and immigrant labor can't really hold it together forever. I doubt that happens though.

Just in general, I feel that we are going to be entering an era of generational warfare very very soon, especially as congress is set to become much younger soon-ish (here's some data from Nate Silver's thing. I don't agree with most of his takes but data is data)

boomers.png
 
It's even more idiotic because, as someone who lives in one of those said buttfuck hicksville, THERE'S NO GODDAMNED OPPURTUNITIES HERE!
This is the only sticking point for a lot of people. You can really only take advantage of these cheap properties if your income isn't location dependent. I think a lot of Boomer advice maybe makes more sense when applied to Gen X and they get things mixed up in their mind. I went on a self-help kick some years ago and many of these books that were written in the early 2000s were targeting Gen X as their demographic, and the impression I get is that they were overworked professionals who had plenty of disposable income but no free time.
Boombers would never admit it, but I'm sure one of the main reasons why they're often NIMBYs is that allowing construction in their neighbourhoods would increase real estate supply and drive down property value including their ofc.
I don't know if I buy this. In my experience after seeing many rural areas become more suburbanized, property values tends to dramatically increase. Ironically, the areas start to feel crowded and become a shittier place to live.
 
Last edited:
This is the only sticking point for a lot of people. You can really only take advantage of these cheap properties if your income isn't location dependent. I think a lot of Boomer advice maybe makes more sense when applied to Gen X and they get things mixed up in their mind. I went on a self-help kick some years ago and many of these books that were written in the early 2000s were targeting Gen X as their demographic, and the impression I get is that they were overworked professionals who had plenty of disposable income but no free time.
It really doesn't apply to gen x either as many of those rural communities where getting ass raped by boomers in the late 80s and the 90s. Just when they were entering the job market. Those early 2000s books where written for bored boomers who had no idea how to entertain themselves or do anything on their own when they were entering their 40s and 50s. Meanwhile the oldest Gen X in the early 2000s where in their 30s. While Gen X can be annoying with their i didn't wear a helmet and drank from a hose shit, they were the first victims of boomer greed and arrogance. Many of them haven't even reached upper management as boomers refuse to retire or die. We can even see this in our government where the majority of politicians are in their 70s and 80s. Generation basically forgotten and lost by their own parents and peers.
 
Yeah but if you post anything other than saying that Donald Trump is a fit, hip, healthy, sexy, strong young alpha male, you'll come back in an hour to 30 replies saying how wrong you are and that you're a libtard for not wanting to get down on our knees and serve Donald Trump as your king
I fail to see how this post is power levelling. It's baffling.
Can someone explain?
 
I fail to see how this post is power levelling. It's baffling.
Can someone explain?
@Dagoth AMOGUS is seething mad because I pointed out his exact behavior. He's got such low levels of testosterone that he wants to be subservient to an obese, elderly, pants-shitting, mush-brained 79 year old man and serve him as his king. He thinks that Donald Trump is the epitome of perfection and to suggest he ever could or would make a mistake is blasphemy and you should be burned at the stake for it. He'd do more about it but given that he lives on welfare his options are pretty limited. Even more limited since Trump is cutting his welfare, but he likes that because it means that billionaires will get to keep more of their money
 
@Dagoth AMOGUS is seething mad because I pointed out his exact behavior. He's got such low levels of testosterone that he wants to be subservient to an obese, elderly, pants-shitting, mush-brained 79 year old man and serve him as his king. He thinks that Donald Trump is the epitome of perfection and to suggest he ever could or would make a mistake is blasphemy and you should be burned at the stake for it. He'd do more about it but given that he lives on welfare his options are pretty limited. Even more limited since Trump is cutting his welfare, but he likes that because it means that billionaires will get to keep more of their money
Sometimes we can get quite MATI and say dumb shit but PL is a very specific thing that's rarely used by anyone. I would say it's one of the least used paid (green) stickers. Forum specific ones don't count.
It's happened more than just a few times. So weird.
 
Sometimes we can get quite MATI and say dumb shit but PL is a very specific thing that's rarely used by anyone. I would say it's one of the least used paid (green) stickers. Forum specific ones don't count.
It's happened more than just a few times. So weird.
He's a newfag rapefugee who only signed up because someone told him that his fellow low test beta cucks who worship Donald Trump are here, so he has no idea the meaning behind power level
 
There are a lot of dumbasses that assume the only costs that matter are housing so yeah, just move an hour away to pay less on a house is leaving out a bunch of other factors. Imagine you are in year 10 having to make your two hour round trip drive yet again, more if it’s bad enough rush hour traffic. And it’s not like you will just only go to your gooncave; the weekends are full of running errands, which are more long drives. About 10-15% of your life will be on the road. Assuming you get eight hours of sleep and work only eight hours at your job, having only a couple hours of free time per day sounds hellish, especially if you have a family.

Plus thanks to Trump’s losing Iran War, the cost of gas is higher than ever. If you’re a migger thinking moving far away is baste, then you’re the type of migger to get the biggest trugg you can get. So yeah, factor in a couple tanks of gas refills too. You ain’t no bitch ass pussy driving an electric car. You need to roll coal to own da libs so assume over $100 in gas per week.

The true cost of living in a rural area is higher than people claim. The true cost are the opportunity costs of a big chunk of uncompensated windshield time, cost of fuel, cost of missing out on your kid’s sports games because you’re stuck in rush hour traffic, etc.

WFH was a good way to mitigate all that but our Benevolent Billionaire Buddies don’t like that so the one way to make life more affordable was cut short.
But Sargon of Akkad said that living in cities where you can walk to your services is exactly like 1984 n shit!

(Not sarcasm, by the way. He did say that.)
 
He's a newfag rapefugee who only signed up because someone told him that his fellow low test beta cucks who worship Donald Trump are here, so he has no idea the meaning behind power level
I mean, if he thinks it's dumb or seethingly mad, just rate it dumb or mati.
I dunno, it shouldn't take that long to understand basic silly stickers.

But Sargon of Akkad said that living in cities where you can walk to your services is exactly like 1984 n shit!

(Not sarcasm, by the way. He did say that.)
The fuel and cost of living crisis had little to no impact on me. I live in a city where everything is a short walk away, and a short bike trip brings me to one of two farmers markets where I can buy fresh produce directly from farmers, which adheres to stringent Eurofag standards. If I'm really feeling like a tightarse, I can catch one of the free buses operated by the farm.
Food is more expensive for sure but without the requirement of a car to get to critical places, none of this shit is affecting me that much. I'm sure at some point I'll get shocked at the price of silly (San Mazano) tomato cans from Italy I love or smug overpriced British artisan crisps (for libtards drinking lattes) being a few dollars more expensive but it's nothing compared to petrol.
My parents who live in Sydney aren't doing that well. They bought into this car-centric life and constantly tried to convince me it's the way to go. I'm not that petty so I didn't gloat about it, but even they said I was right about petroleum reliance. The few choke points exist in highly unstable regions. Just then, I needed fresh pasta and forgot to buy it earlier. It took me 10 minutes on foot to obtain. For my parents, that would have been half an hour's drive since the nearest Italian deli is a few suburbs away, the round trip would have been an hour. They'd end up boiling ramen noodles, lol.
There's clearly disadvantages to city living but I think it's all immediately outweighed by convenience. The extra I pay in rent is nothing compared to petrol cost and vehicle maintenance. If I were to live in a rural place, I would raise a few chooks and maintain a vegetable garden. Chickens are gross creatures but they're adorable.
 
Last edited:
the shitbox they paid $15,000, now worth $2,500,000

My childhood home has quadrupled in value in the years since I moved out. I don't want to PL so let's just say that I will never be able to own a house in my hometown and that there are some aspects of the housing market in the whole region that are genuinely dystopian and there is no resolution to any of other than Total Boomer Death.

Let's be honest, kuck would have completely defended it, and would have likely called people anti american for being against it.

All that chatter about Kirk potentially turning against Trump the way Tucker or Joe Rogan has is preposterous. Kirk was a partisan who was running a partisan organization, all it would have taken is one phone call to put an end to his mild pushback.
 
I didn't see it mentioned yet, and I'm late with it, but Trump had a 1.5-hour call with President Putin on 29 April.

ISW 29 April report / Archive
This is what I find most interesting, though (my emphasis):
The Kremlin also reportedly used the Trump-Putin call to scold Trump for US-Israeli operations against Iran. Ushakov claimed that Putin expressed support for the ceasefire extension in the Middle East but that Putin also warned Trump of “inevitable, extremely dire consequences” for Iran, the Middle East, and world if the US and Israel “resort to force again.”
Putin also reportedly told Trump that a ground operation in Iran is “completely unacceptable and dangerous.”
Trump has always sucked up to Putin and trusted him, so I'm curious how Trump took being told not to invade Iran. Trump is already known for firing and replacing people who disagree with him, or refuse to do stupid shit he wants, and I'm certain he's already been warned by multiple generals/admirals not to conduct ground operations, so being told "no" by someone he can't get rid of is interesting.

Ironically, a ground invasion might be the only way to stop Iran in the near future. Unless maintaining the blockade, stopping their oil exports (which may lead to oil production halting), destroying Iran's civilian infrastructure, obliterating its military, and wrecking the Iranian economy leads to a surrender or capitulation within the next few months, a ground force might be required for a Trump "victory."

The purpose of war is to achieve strategic goals that diplomacy cannot achieve. If Iran doesn't unconditionally surrender, as Trump demanded at the start of his war, then Trump failed to achieve his original goal. Diplomacy failed, and war failed.

If Iran surrenders but doesn't relinquish control of the Strait and doesn't halt its uranium enrichment, then Trump failed to achieve his current goals. Diplomacy and war failed.

Trump's current strategy of blockading Iran, halting oil exports (which may lead to production halts), and threatening to destroy Iran's civilian infrastructure and military hasn't led to a surrender. Iran is still negotiating, not giving in. Trump's goals are currently not met.

If round 2 of US air superiority doesn't meet any of the above, then all goals have failed; the war was truly pointless. Only if Iran surrenders or gives in to Trump's demands did the war possibly achieve what diplomacy could not. But if Iran doesn't surrender and the war continues, then what other options are there now?

A ground invasion; a continuation of war to achieve what diplomacy has not. Otherwise, Trump would have to admit defeat in the war he started.

It's quite possible this all ends in a favorable "victory," with Iran halting uranium enrichment and not retaining control of the Strait. That's possible. That would be preferable to a continuation of war.

And for any MIGA who wants to shift blame away from Trump, who is the one person with the power to stop American military operations? Who is the one person with the power to withdraw all forces he ordered to war? Did the SECDEF start this war? The SECNAV? The Joint Chiefs? The Vice President? Laura Loomer? It's Trump's war, regardless of the outcome, and a "victory" wouldn't make him a great person. He's still a rapist.
 
My childhood home has quadrupled in value in the years since I moved out. I don't want to PL so let's just say that I will never be able to own a house in my hometown and that there are some aspects of the housing market in the whole region that are genuinely dystopian and there is no resolution to any of other than Total Boomer Death.



All that chatter about Kirk potentially turning against Trump the way Tucker or Joe Rogan has is preposterous. Kirk was a partisan who was running a partisan organization, all it would have taken is one phone call to put an end to his mild pushback.
Its funny when you mention Joe Rogan when Joe is still riding Trump's dick and texts him regularly, hell he even went to the white house very recently.
 
Back
Top Bottom