Swedish Liberals Fight to Legalize Incest and Necrophilia

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
I'm honestly more concerned about the incest problem of the two things to be pissy about.
Legalizing incest would probably hit rural areas the hardest. I don't think everyone would be running out to be banging their mom the moment it's legal. What would happen though is that rednecks out in the sticks would be having a lot more cousin marriages. The quality of their genetics would drop like a rock.

Think Pakistan.

This is one of those things where big city hipsters think "lol, love is love, if it's not hurting anyone, what's the big deal?" And most of the time, I'm totally on board with that.

But this kinda thing has far reaching consequences over time. Incest doesn't give you retard babies immediately. (That's why I hate the incest exception to abortion laws.) Incest is a problem because, over generations, shitty genes get concentrated in a narrow bloodline.
 
Disease is a dumb argument against necrophilia. It's not illegal to fuck a christmas ham.

Regarding consent and ownership of the corpse, that's a well trod area of law. We've been dealing with it for as long as people have been dying.

Like, right now, you can have someone cremated and you can usually do whatever the fuck you want with the ashes at that point. Keep them in an urn, scatter them, snort them, ingest them; do whatever you want, the sky's the limit. And then there's all sorts of stuff like plastination and embalming (why do we embalm bodies we're just going to bury?) and whatever soviet magic they used to preserve Lenin's corpse for display.

Really the "eww it's gross" argument is all that's left. And I genuinely don't care about that anymore.

I really can't find the effort to care about some weirdo selling the rights for someone to fuck his cold butt after he dies.

Heh, also, this reminds me that, up until recently, it used to be legal in my neck of the woods to bury dead bodies without notifying anyone of the death.
Doesn't appear to be any laws prohibiting it in MD, so have at it!
Screenshot_2017-07-19-20-53-22.png
 
Think Pakistan.
The muzzies have fucked up gene pools because they practice arranged marriage on top of incest. Since the point of marriage in their culture is preserverving wealth (i. e. goats) even when people don't marry first or second cousins they have relatively recent common ancestors as all families from the same social standing are hopelessly tangled.
 
At the rate that Sweden is becoming Swedistan, the only way to fix their society is to send in the Chechens to uncuck the place in the same way they cured their region of homosexuality; as an extra bonus, Chechens are Muslims and we all know that the world doesn't give a fuck about kebab on kebab genocide.
 
The muzzies have fucked up gene pools because they practice arranged marriage on top of incest. Since the point of marriage in their culture is preserverving wealth (i. e. goats) even when people don't marry first or second cousins they have relatively recent common ancestors as all families from the same social standing are hopelessly tangled.
Just because you and your sister fell in love by accident doesn't make it right buddy, stop trying to rationalise it.
 
Disease is a dumb argument against necrophilia. It's not illegal to fuck a christmas ham.

Really the "eww it's gross" argument is all that's left. And I genuinely don't care about that anymore.
Not really. If you have sex with a corpse and catch something, what will happen to your living partner if you pass it on? That's like having aids because you humped everything and giving it to other people. I don't think having intercourse with food is the same thing. Having relations with a sandwich sounds safer. You'll probably have a lesser chance of catching maggots.

Plz don't fuck the Christmas ham.
 
The muzzies have fucked up gene pools because they practice arranged marriage on top of incest. Since the point of marriage in their culture is preserverving wealth (i. e. goats) even when people don't marry first or second cousins they have relatively recent common ancestors as all families from the same social standing are hopelessly tangled.

They should just skip the middleman and just rape the goats without all the other bullshit.

The thing with the dead is that it's all about symbolism. One way to potentially destroy a society is to fuck with their most revered segment, which is their dead or their children. It creates a horrible slippery slope.

People who develop a fetish for the dead, and it is more likely if there's no deterrent effect of having a law against it, are much more likely to seek to acquire corpses (or create them) than people who don't, who are just plain not ever going to do that.

It's a slippery slope.

Also, the behavior prohibited (fucking corpses) is of such negative social value that allowing it can't possibly be justified considering the cons. If it leads even to one person getting killed who otherwise wouldn't have been, it's wrong to legalize it.
 
@Marvin, while it's not ILLEGAL to have sex with a Christmas ham, it's still a violation of common sense, ruins a perfectly good ham, and it's not the kind of deviancy a civil society should encourage, regardless of your moral beliefs. Besides, all societies with a hint of common sense regarding hygiene want to discourage such practices to limit the spread of disease and uncleanliness that leads to disease, and defiling a dead animal, cooked or not, is a practice that flies in the face of this common sense guideline.

As for necrophilia and the disease argument being dumb, wrong. Let's assume the corpse is properly preserved and miraculously, you don't get disease from it. That said, your sexual fluids and other body matter just contaminated the corpse, which, assuming it wasn't diseased yet, well, by having sex with it, you just introduced culture to the petri dish that will lead to that circumstance. Alternatively, you try to clean up the corpse after you are done, which still introduces moisture and other fluids to the corpse that can cause its decay and lead to the same outcome.

Basically, fucking the dead is going to spread disease in some manner and no society with a hint of common sense should encourage such practices regardless of your moral and societal stance on necrophilia.

As for incest, again, the genetics going down the toilet after awhile argument is a hard one for anyone sane to counter, and if it doesn't happen immediately, it will happen after a couple of generations with absolute certainty, so it's a bad idea to encourage by deliberate consent, regardless of any other moral argument you might want to bring to the table.
 
Christ, people, it's simpler than that. There are laws against these things because people who do them are invariably disgusting, and doing them repeatedly renders someone untouchably gross. Wanting to sleep with the dead or your siblings or whatever means you aren't properly able to form meaningful relationships with people with whom you have a roughly equal power relationship. This holds true for bestiality, too.

The reason societies make this illegal is to make sure antisocial behavior, like imprinting sexual/romantic ideation on those incapable of consent, or those who you can manipulate with existing familial relationships, is explicitly disavowed. Sure, you won't catch everyone who does it, but a civilized society should take a clear stance toward pro-social behavior, like learning to interact with humans who are alive and non-related to you.
 
yeah being able to dig up a random corpse and suck it off wouldn't have any socially deleterious effects whatsoever. human decency? who needs it, as long as we have our cummies. let's just fuck anything living or dead, like a pack of wild animals.


i know we're supposed to be mad about the muzzies taking over sweden but that society is such a degenerate cesspool you've gotta wonder if the swedes haven't earned it. it'll trigger some of you :neckbeard: types but the wages of sin have been death for those pozzed nords.
 
Last edited:
If it's any consolation it was proposed by a youth party (and the youth parties usually consist of, simply put, retarded teenagers who merely want to fight for a cause no matter what it is) and was shut down by the actual political party they belong to (who rightfully said 'dude what the fuck') - it's even so vapid one of the political parties think it's false-flagging

tl;dr read the article, it isn't the swedish apocalypse - it's just a select group of idiots being idiots
 
Last edited:
If it's any consolation it was proposed by a youth party (and the youth parties usually consist of, simply put, exceptional teenagers who merely want to fight for a cause no matter what it is) and was shut down by the actual political party they belong to (who rightfully said 'dude what the fuck') - it's even so vapid one of the political parties think it's false-flagging

tl;dr read the article, it isn't the swedish apocalypse - it's just a select group of idiots being idiots

Imagine being such a fucking idiot that your party thinks your idea is a false-flag move. You are so retarded, the more comforting thought is that your enemies are the ones trying this.

I've had moments where my buddies think I'm acting weird, but never anything where they think I've been replaced by an evil twin or something.
 
Imagine being such a fucking idiot that your party thinks your idea is a false-flag move. You are so exceptional, the more comforting thought is that your enemies are the ones trying this.

I've had moments where my buddies think I'm acting weird, but never anything where they think I've been replaced by an evil twin or something.

Most people don't want to associate with people who openly support legalizing incest and necrophilia and so it's easier to just disown them rather than having to admit that any part of your political spectrum supports playing hide the sausage with corpses
 
Back