- Joined
- May 4, 2020
The funniest outcome would be if the Committee voted against the settlement. Could still happen. Get Pat high on hope and then - BAM!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is he enjoying prison ?Hey faggot you do know the person responsible was arrested and snitched on his friends and is currently in prison for it, right?
You gaf nigga, you brought it upWho gaf nigga
? Doubtful. He got a disgustingly short sentence and they put him in a low security federal camp close to his house so he got a much better deal than he deserved. But he's a weirdo and a snitch so he will have a bad time of it anywhere he ends upIs he enjoying prison ?
Sounds like hopium tbh. Is there any instance you remember when a city council declined such recommendation based on anything other than the most blatant and egregious acts of corruption/retardation?Next vote seems to be on the 26th, so I'd wager that's when they'll vote on the settlement
It depends how they characterized it in the settlement. If his lawyer is competent, they'd characterize it as compensatory, since compensation for a loss isn't taxable.Realistically, after he pays his lawyers and his Mil, and the taxes-- it is taxable, no?--He won't have much left.
if there are an odd number of pepperoni and grounding machines bought then expect for a crime drop in Milwaukee
I wonder how much will be expended on greasy burgers, bad beer and equally bad boasts that he won the case. I doubt the City would care enough about it. They would've had to reinforce floors and other surfaces to cope with big boy too. A few bucks for blubber boy is likely far cheaper.
It is not yet dismissed, correct, but approval by the judge on these matters is usually a mere technicallity.Am I correct in understanding that this is not fully dismissed from court yet, just a request saying "they city is going to settke, but hasn't fully settled yet"? Is there still a chance that the porcine Prince can oink his way into them taking it back?
In a way, I got my wish...but at what cost?I've been thinking about Tomlinson v. Milwaukee and I think I want Pat to win. I weighed the pros and cons of a Pat win and a Pat loss and while a Pat loss would be extremely funny, it would only be short term. In fact, if he loses it might buck break him even more and make him less entertaining in the long run. However, if he wins, he not only gets presumably 6-7 figures to spend on dumb shit he will surely brag about on Twitter, which provides amusement in of itself (and all that money will be gone within a year or two), but it will give his ego such a boost that we may get a return to the fiery Pat of years gone by. Also, he might feel so emboldened by the victory he attempts another lolsuit, maybe he'll sue Dan or Leslie, which would land him a humiliating defeat to cope about for years to come.
Ultimately, I want whatever is funniest and provides me the most entertainment to happen and I think if you look at it long term, Pat winning will provide more entertainment. It may sting in the moment to hear that Pat won, but I'm confident it would be the best outcome for Patposters capable of thinking ahead.
He would surely be celebrating and gloating if he won any sizable payout. I doubt he'll even come out of this ahead financially, unless the city is also being forced to pay his legal fees. I know jack shit about legal proceedings though, so don't listen to my dumbass speculation.Pat seems really aggravated, you think he’d take a victory lap.
Yeah, I was going to ask.If it is 150.000 for all settlements the city will do this year then he couldn't have received much honestly. Maybe 10k or 20k at most