Can't fight reality, so I chose to embrace it.
So you admit that you hold no powers to change anything about this world - and furthermore that your Judgements do not carry any weight?
Took you long enough to come to terms with your own impotence, Dick Jr.
Hypothesis: Reincarnation has been scientifically proven (google: Reincarnation Theory & its 26 Principles including Theory of Luck Equation [ex. Einstein returned as Watson]).
Define the concept of something being "scientifically proven" Dick.
Cause linking to a site run by a crazy bum who's obsessed with a couple numbers and infuriated with the insignificance of his own existence aint proof, ye ken.
Data collected: At this time, c. 12:30, I had the TV on Star Trek: TNG. I practically have this 7-year series memorized, but forgot about the episode where Q portrays himself as Napoleon and wears his uniform. I turned to History Channel and Pawn Stars was on. At 1 pm, a new episode started with this guy coming into the pawn shop and saying, "I have a document signed by Napoleon". That's a BIG synchronism!
Conclusion: Napoleon was reincarnated as Mussolini who returned as Donald Trump.

"Scientifically proven" ladies and gentlemen.
I have a hard time thinking Brad would actually outright *lie* about a synch occurring... his mental condition would prevent him from being cognizant of the fact that his "signs" weren't really there-- he HAS to believe they are, to maintain his delusion.
What sounds plausible to me would be him deliberately waiting until a certain time to make a post, or queueing up a recorded show on command, or allowing for a great deal of leniency as to when he expects the syncs to occur.
... not to mention the fact that so many times, what he things is relevant to the discussion actually isn't. At all.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case. But you have to also consider how much time it takes him to answer to someone. Assuming it's a timeframe of 2 minutes, that would give any show more than enough time to hop from topic to topic. If it's commentators or ads, it's even worse.
And if there's just one thing vaguely related to whatever it is he was doing, he considers it irrefutabkle proof.
Since he defines what constitutes a synchronism
after "experiencing" it, they are essentially worthless.
He never predicts it - or rather, should I say: he never predicts it correctly. He said there would be a blizzard during Trumps inauguration, mind you.
And a lot of times, I would not be surprised if he wrote something for a forum, heard something that could be vaguely related to whatever it is he was doing and then altering his already written post to accomodate it.
After all, he is heavily fudging numbers to make them fit his 4-7 nonsense.
You never read anything on Hinduism or Buddhism I see.
Would it surprise anyone if he said he invented them?