You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
💪 Tough GuysDalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.
Why would I support a nigger or some inbred hick that have no impact on my life whatsoever? Both fucked up big time, in public, with multiple cameras around. Sorry I don't support subhumans of any color, nigger or otherwise.
Fuck all that "muh team" noise.
Don’t worry, brothers. Race war starts in two (2) more weeks. Surely then White People will wake up, suddenly agree on everything important unlike any time in history, gas the kikes, and institute total nigger death, bringing about the White utopia.
Leftoids continue basing their entire existence on fictions of their mind.
No, I'm not wrong. You faggots in this thread are conflating reality with your wants. Chud's statement was that he will lawfully defend himself against exactly what he did: assault. That's not provocation or a threat in any legal sense. Even if it were this "provocation" thing, which it isn't, you are still ignoring that it doesn't retroactively apply to incidents the current black retard wasn't a part of. Otherwise anyone who said anything "provactive" online would be legally marked as able to be hunted down in perpetuity, which it seems every anti-Chud account really wants.
You can keep plugging your ears all you want, but it's obvious what you faggots are doing. KF infested with browns/leftoids.
Makes more sense than him thinking he is going to be able to run somehow, I do wonder for what though? Is he going to be one of those card dealer guys to pay off the debt?
I'm going to reply to you politely, because while I was initially suspicious that you were arguing in bad faith like some retards in this thread, I think that you are conflating different legal concepts with each other, assigning aspects of one to another incorrectly, which is understandable given that law is fucking complicated, but let me elaborate:
No provocation is not defined by threatening immediate bodily harm. A reasonable fear of immediate bodily harm is the basis for a justified self-defense. If am minding my own business and someone comes along threatening me with harm, or assaulting me when I very clearly did not want it, then I am justified in self-defense. The key here is that it is defense; meaning I am not actively seeking conflict. If are you trying to provoke a fight, you are not on the defensive, you are an aggressor.
If a nigger attacks me for no reason, then I am justified in defending myself by any means. If I provoke a nigger into attacking me, who would nototherwise be attacking me, then I am not justified.
calling someone a nigger and asking them if they're going to chimp out doesn't meet the definition of provocation. Just reverse the races, what if a black guy called Chud a cracker and asked him if he was going to crack the whip, do you think that would meet the legal standard of provocation? Do those words meet the standard of making an imminent threat?
This is the problem. As I explained above on this post, you misunderstood the meaning of provocation. Yes, these words in most jurisdictions would meet the definition of provocation. I don't care if its Chud the Builder or Johnny Somali, a person who intentionally seeks conflict is likely going to meet the definition of provocation which in moist jurisdictions involves the forfeiture of your self-defense rights. Check out this post.
Maybe I'm imagining it but I swear a saw a clip of the end of the stream leading up to the shooting but I can't find it. Do you have indication otherwise and if so do you mind sharing?
Chud was livestreaming but only posted an 11 second audio clip of the incident itself. I would imagine that if he wasn't provoking the niggers, then releasing the audio BEFORE the incident would help his case for justified self-defense. Curious why he didn't...
If I have to choose between Chud or a PTSD nigger who threatened to kill his wife and burn his house down choosing to believe Chud is a pretty easy choice.
You DON'T have to choose. I didn't. Neither of them are my friends or family, nor would I want them to be.
Yes, PTSD nigger was unlawful in his assaulting of Chud, however, with the way self-defense laws work, Chud is almost certainly unlawful in his shooting of PTSD nigger because he is a provocateur who has even stated on social media posts his expectation and the "inevitability" of him shooting someone. That conveys clear intention to place himself in dangerous situations and clear intention to harm, which is certainly going to work against his self-defense argument.
this is sort of a moot point because we haven't learned exactly what was said but obviously going up to somebody and insulting them is going to be seen as provocation, especially if you're acting on the meta understanding of...
...if you KNOW that saying the magic nigger word is going to result in someone losing their shit and that they might actually hit you then you can't possibly hide behind "but i wasn't provoking anyone! i was exercising muh 1st amendment rights by calling him the blackest nigger i have ever laid eyes on!"
compare Chud with that one kid that stole his hat whose also livestreaming himself being an unhinged retard yelling nigger everywhere and ask yourself why that kid isn't in constant conflict? because intent matters.
no, flashing his gun would be such an example of threat of imminent violence if the warrant is anything to go by, he's no longer on the hook just for his verbiage, it's also his actions that he's on the hook for even if he does manage to beat murder charges.
He didn't sound like he was lying to me and he knows that there are sure to be cameras and eye witnesses so if he lies his story will fall apart rather quickly.
he told the police he was reaching for his mace rather than a gun even though he had no mace on him, lying? stupid? take your pick. he literally said "I DINDU NUFFIN" and now we have people taking his word for it as if guilty people don't proclaim their innocence all the time when arrested.
You giving me a bad sticker will be seen as provocation. If you do so I will be able to physically assault you, and you will have no right to defend yourself.
Let this be a warning to everyone before they give this post a bad sticker; your rights will be forfeit because of your provocation.
what if a black guy called Chud a cracker and asked him if he was going to crack the whip, do you think that would meet the legal standard of provocation?
They’re not comparable. One term has historically been used to demonize, disenfranchise, and harm Black people. I also don’t think it should be repurposed, but it’s still not comparable to other words. There’s a difference between people using edgy language on a forum for shock value and someone going out and harassing others with the intent to intimidate or harm them.
Potentially Criminal did a stream on this, I haven't finished it yet but thought I would post it here as I didn't see it posted:
(YouTube) @Potentially Criminal Do you have any insights on the process for footage being released? I'm curious to know when or if footage of these types of incidents is released to the public.
So he had a plane ticket just sitting in his car? Waiting for…… the day he actually killed somebody? I swear to god I’m not playing dumb. I just really don’t understand the plane ticket shit. I’m trying to read up on it.
That isn't how plane tickets to another country work. They are for specific dates. This ticket was for May 22nd, today (L, A). You can't buy one and "save it for a rainy day" because the price changes dramatically depending on many factors. According to this guy who seems to have some contact with Chud, he had the ticket to go to a poker tournament in Instanbul.
(X | Xcancel | Archive)
I don't like Jake Lang, he seems like a weirdo, tried to get with an underage girl (which he probably should be in jail for), and is a jew, but it is pretty funny how sensitive judges are about their courts being criticised to arrest him for saying the court is "two tiered". I've never understood why judges in particular always seem to get so easily worked up over relatively mild criticism.
The white women in this thread are arguing that Chud provoked the attack using his prior streams as evidence of probable provocation during the shooting incident.
The two most retarded ones (@WhimsicalTrolli and @Bangladeshi Kiwi Farmer) are both non-White, presumably men, which tracks with their constant talk about homosexual rape, since POCs are over 1/3 more likely to be homosexual than White people. Just standard "muh dik" talk from blacks. I don't think I've ever seen a woman talk about how much they hope a dude gets raped by a black guy in prison like these two constantly fantasize about.
The next most retarded user (@Carmen The Aids Rabbit) is a male furry who literally had cropped furry porn as an avatar in the past (and it kinda looks like he does now, but I can't really tell).
It isn't a woman thing at all.
The other posters I do find more agreeable since they're aren't coming at it from an angle of just hating on whitey as much as possible, but just they genuinely think he was wrong & started the fight.
Like I said, people hear the words "police found plane tickets" and just completely shut down their critical thinking and forget that people travel sometimes for verious reasons. It's a thing that happens.
From what he had said just before the shooting it sounded like he was very stressed so I wouldn't be surprised if he was trying to just get away from everything in a bit. Apparently was going to a specific poker tournament in Turkey. Also I think its pretty funny the police post that he had a rifle and shotgun like it is some kind of revelation and wasn't something anyone with a brain could have guessed from his personality.
An investigator testified that surveillance video from the courthouse showed Eatherly approach a man with a selfie stick before walking away. The defense said the man was then seen grabbing Eatherly and placing him in a headlock before shots were fired.
This seems incredibly good for Dalton's defense if the headlock part is true. At that point, being grappled, he would have no ability to retreat or effective methods to push the other guy away.
The two most retarded ones (@WhimsicalTrolli and @Bangladeshi Kiwi Farmer) are both non-White, presumably men, which tracks with their constant talk about homosexual rape,
This is my most closely-followed thread at the moment (there's a serious lolcow content drought), and neither of these two dark-complexioned gentleman have fantasized about Chud being raped in prison by black inmates. At all. I'm worried about ya.
/Pol/ has deeply implanted these surrealist fantasies about blacked porn in your psyche, and now you're instinctively projecting this shit onto arguments where the subject was never even once brought up. There is an ambiance of homosexual interracial porn that silently plays in your brain at all hours of the day, filling you with a dull, aching rage that doesn't even register anymore, occasionally popping into your conscious via hallucinations like this one. I think you need to see a doctor. Or maybe a predominantly black gay bar, idk.
According to an account on Twitter, one investigator testified that the surveillance footage shows Chud being put in a headlock as he was walking away. If that's true, he very well might be acquitted.
No one is going to rape Dalton. He is just going to be put into racial sensitivity training. Just so happens, the instructor is Tyrone and class is in the prison shower.
This is my most closely-followed thread at the moment (there's a serious lolcow content drought), and neither of these two dark-complexioned gentleman have fantasized about Chud being raped in prison by black inmates. At all. I'm worried about ya.
Hah! To be fair, I did make one joke about chud's imminent buck-breaking, out of probably over a dozen posts. But yeah, the "constant talk" framing is insane and he's absolutely hallucinating about gay porn.
precendents that allow people to shoot anyone that takes a swing at them would play right into the hands of black criminals and allow a whole lot more violent disorder against whites and everyone else.
You're not "setting a precedent that can be used against whites" by letting chud off, they already let blacks off for murder, that precedent is already there and used against us.
The Iryna killing, guy is getting let off for "insanity", shouted "I got dat white gurl", Gary Edwards stabbed and killed a white guy for no reason, during the killing the guy called him a nigger, after he got stabbed, Gary was let off because of that.
I'm tired of this disingenuous "what if they use it against us?"
