June 6th, 2014 14 Branchland Time Lapse

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the first I've heard of that, so I'm going to need a little confirmation, but I can totally see him doing it. If true, I'm betting he was at his most sanctimonious.
I'm pretty sure this happened. I cannot find my notes on the subject, because I've only got a shitty plain text search. God, I wish I had google-quality searches everywhere.
 
But if the guy was an active user of ED and such a /b/tard that he launched something called the "Lulz News Network" -- sorry, that taints everything, it's the original sin and there's no atonement for it. Such a person speaks with neighbors, who reveal something truly horrible and hateworthy about Chris -- an act really as bad as the worst he's done, and possibly worse than everything put together? and includes a nice detail about indecent exposure in front of a minor too? From the Original Creator of the "Lulz News Network"? It's not even weenish. It's like... neo-weenish.

Oh I wasn't trying to defend or legitimize anything the time lapse creator is doing or has done in the past. I can only speak from personal memory that I am not buying the whole "contemporary artist" schtick. Not when the guy played such a heavy roll in creating an ED article and trolling the person it was about and especially not when he formerly spearheaded a series called "Lulz News Network" that lasted for more than one episode.

My goal was to provide some perspective so that when someone asks "who in their right mind would make a time lapse of Chris' house" they'll have an answer. This is who.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWCissey and Artard
DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? ;)
DO I CARE? :P

But seriously, I often ask Marvin and Alec for extra confirmation (or go look for it myself). Not because I don't believe them, or you, but more because it's important to get all the details out and make certain we only give Chris shit for the stuff he's actually responsible for.
I'm pretty sure this happened. I cannot find my notes on the subject, because I've only got a shitty plain text search. God, I wish I had google-quality searches everywhere.
Aren't you stuck running the CWCki, or am I thinking of someone else? If so, have you considered using google's custom search engine on it? That might make things easier (or there might be some drawback to it I don't know about).
He actually tried to steal someone else's pet?
I don't think Chris planned to steal the dog. It's probably more a case that he thought finders keepers applies to pets because he's a greedy idiot.
Was this before or after he bought Snoopy and Clover? Still fucked up either way.
If only Clover and Snoopy would slip their leads and get "stolen" themselves. I feel so sorry for those dogs.
 
DO I CARE? :P

But seriously, I often ask Marvin and Alec for extra confirmation (or go look for it myself). Not because I don't believe them, or you, but more because it's important to get all the details out and make certain we only give Chris shit for the stuff he's actually responsible for.
Yeah, I know what you mean.

But yeah, LYLT's on par (or better) than Alec and myself, especially about stuff Chris does around town. She just doesn't interact with the community too often. (Until now?)

Aren't you stuck running the CWCki, or am I thinking of someone else? If so, have you considered using google's custom search engine on it? That might make things easier (or there might be some drawback to it I don't know about).
Oh, google's the only way I search the cwcki.
Every cwcki search I make said:
site:sonichu.com chris running over snake

I will consider adding a google search to the cwcki itself, for user's convenience.

My problem is is that my email records and notes and stuff are all password protected, so I can't search them via google. Maybe I might look into a tolerable open-source search function sometime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holdek
Forgive me for being a slow in the mind, but I am to understand that you are confirming that Fatty did attempt to steal someone else's dog, correct? If so is there any truth to the rumor about him killing a dog? Or him accidentally flashing a teen?

Sorry if I'm sounding Naive here, but I figured it was better to just ask point blank than to just keep skirting around the topic while making snide remarks.
 
Forgive me for being a slow in the mind, but I am to understand that you are confirming that Fatty did attempt to steal someone else's dog, correct? If so is there any truth to the rumor about him killing a dog? Or him accidentally flashing a teen?

Sorry if I'm sounding Naive here, but I figured it was better to just ask point blank than to just keep skirting around the topic while making snide remarks.
Stealing the dog happened. Him killing a dog sounds like bullshit.
 
Forgive me for being a slow in the mind, but I am to understand that you are confirming that Fatty did attempt to steal someone else's dog, correct? If so is there any truth to the rumor about him killing a dog? Or him accidentally flashing a teen?

Sorry if I'm sounding Naive here, but I figured it was better to just ask point blank than to just keep skirting around the topic while making snide remarks.

Both of those statements are attributed to the creator of the time lapse video whose credibility is questionable. He allegedly asked nearby residents of 14BC what they knew about its former occupants and "Chris killed a dog" and "Chris wore a skirt without underwear" were the only two replies. The other neighbors either failed to comment or did not know the Chandlers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holdek
But yeah, LYLT's on par (or better) than Alec and myself, especially about stuff Chris does around town.
Yeah, I've been thinking maybe "confirmation" isn't really the word for what I'm asking for. Maybe something more like the Christory version of "source citation" or something.
She just doesn't interact with the community too often.
Probably because she has more sense than the rest of us.
I will consider adding a google search to the cwcki itself, for user's convenience.
Thanks is advance, though it might come with some requirement that you allow adsense or something. I don't know if that's worth dealing with to you.
My problem is is that my email records and notes and stuff are all password protected, so I can't search them via google. Maybe I might look into a tolerable open-source search function sometime.
Ah. I was thinking this was something already on the CWCki, not your own hoarded top secret stuff.
Him killing a dog sounds like bullshit.
Did the neighbor supposedly say Chris ran over the dog, or just that he somehow was responsible for its death? Because I can easily see Chris doing something stupid like leaving out a puddle of anitfreeze or something and the neighbor never confronting him over it because what would be the point? There's also the possibility that the Branchland Court rumor mill has somehow conflated the snake slaying and the dognapping into "Chris ran over a dog once." This is one of the reasons why I tend to ask for confirmation and sources and the like; things get garbled in the retelling. Also Chris' neighbors may well not all be the most reliable of sources (to say nothing of internet "artists"). I personally believe that the closer you are to Chris, the less amusing he becomes, and someone living right next to him might well do everything in their power to avoid him and work hard to know as little about him as they possibly can. I probably would.
 
I have little reason to doubt the neighbors. Hell, some of them have probably been ween'd accidentally because of proximity. He's the local weirdo and enough people know him that stuff will circulate. I bet two of the three stories were first hand and the dog one was second hand. Like "Yeah, my kid saw this cross-dresser's skirt flip and and I heard that he also hit the guy down the street's dog." sort of thing.

Yes, but we're not doubting the neighbors. We're doubting a story ABOUT the neighbors, told from an unknown source. If Mr. Wilson from across the street came on the forum and told his story, we'd probably accept it at face value. That's not what we're seeing here. We're seeing someone who's claiming to speak for "the neighbors", when in reality it might be Ali Babullshit.
 
Yeah, I've been thinking maybe "confirmation" isn't really the word for what I'm asking for. Maybe something more like the Christory version of "source citation" or something.
For a lot of Chris sightings and IRL stories that I hear about, LYLT is usually either the source, or we might get the story straight from the horse's mouth. Once in awhile, there's a friend-of-a-friend story, which I don't share unless I'm completely convinced of it myself.

Thanks is advance, though it might come with some requirement that you allow adsense or something. I don't know if that's worth dealing with to you.
Hmm... well, the setup seems easy enough. It's not requiring a developer account or a key or anything. But, I'll look into it later.

Did the neighbor supposedly say Chris ran over the dog, or just that he somehow was responsible for its death? Because I can easily see Chris doing something stupid like leaving out a puddle of anitfreeze or something and the neighbor never confronting him over it because what would be the point? There's also the possibility that the Branchland Court rumor mill has somehow conflated the snake slaying and the dognapping into "Chris ran over a dog once." This is one of the reasons why I tend to ask for confirmation and sources and the like; things get garbled in the retelling. Also Chris' neighbors may well not all be the most reliable of sources (to say nothing of internet "artists"). I personally believe that the closer you are to Chris, the less amusing he becomes, and someone living right next to him might well do everything in their power to avoid him and work hard to know as little about him as they possibly can. I probably would.
Well, the time lapse guy said that the neighbor told him that "Chris hit and killed one of their dogs".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holdek
...The only person he ever deliberately hit was Snyder....
STAHP

Every murderer has a street of neighbors who had no idea who he was. People don't have enough sense of community to pay attention to who lives on their street....
It's actually pretty bad that half the neighbors are aware of his antics. In this day and age, people don't even know anything about their next-door-neighbors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artard and Mogambo
Well, the time lapse guy said that the neighbor told him that "Chris hit and killed one of their dogs".
Ah. Then I suspect that without trustworthy corroboration its more likely the neighbors are conflating the snake with the dognapping, and the time lapse guy is misquoting them further. Or he's just making the whole thing up.
 
Chris once swerved his car to intentionally run over a snake, reversed, ran over it again, etc. Now, it's just a wild snake, but still.

That's pretty psychotic, and I think its a good insight into Chris' twisted little mind. He doesn't lash out at other people because he's a coward and likely knows there would be consequences, but he has no qualms about torturing a defenseless animal. In fact, we've seen a little of this with his execution of the Asperchu Four in his comic fantasy world. This is more reason why people shouldn't feel all that sorry for Chris. He's an asshole.

So yeah, I could see him hitting a dog, or cat, or other pet and just driving away. It's often in the nature of people like him to take out their rage or smaller, easier targets.

Thing is though, most people don't like snakes and considering media likes to depict them as some sort of evil creature, Chris likely had no problem running over it.

Yeah. I blame Christianity for the irrational fear, even hatred of snakes. Nothing against Christians personally, but it is a ridiculous cultural bias. That probably also contributes to Chris' violence towards the snake particular. Chris proudly lauds himself as a Christian, despite taking most of his theology from freaking Family Guy...
 
Ah. Then I suspect that without trustworthy corroboration its more likely the neighbors are conflating the snake with the dognapping, and the time lapse guy is misquoting them further. Or he's just making the whole thing up.
The snake thing could've happened anywhere, but out in the sticks, where Chris lives, there's a solid chance it happened on some back road, where no one was around to see it, and even if someone saw it, I can't imagine it would've spread too far as a rumor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWCTime
The snake thing could've happened anywhere, but out in the sticks, where Chris lives, there's a solid chance it happened on some back road, where no one was around to see it, and even if someone saw it, I can't imagine it would've spread too far as a rumor.
I'm too lazy to do the homework to cite it (I think it originally came out in IRC), but I'm reasonably certain he did that right out front of his house.
 
If Chris hit the dog, there's no reason to believe he did it purposely.

No reason to believe he wouldn't do it on purpose either though. Especially after the snake incident. Animal cruelty is pretty sick, but like I said, Chris kind of has a rotten personality. We just don't see it all that much because he's also kind of a coward. But apparently he has no problem killing animals. That's a bad sign.

I'm too lazy to do the homework to cite it (I think it originally came out in IRC), but I'm reasonably certain he did that right out front of his house.

Could be. Honestly, its not in the CWCki, so I've only seen it mentioned in these forums, but snakes will live right next to people. It could have happened in his drive way, could have happened on a country road, honestly it could have happened anywhere.

Just for the record, I'm not necessarily saying that Chris definitely DID hit a dog, let alone whether it was intentional or not. I'm just saying that I could conceivably see Chris doing something like that, because underneath all his fat and atismu, Chris has revealed himself to be a deeply troubled manchild, and its not all that unusual for people like him to turn to violence. Of course, Chris is a pussy as I've said before, and is afraid of consequences, but if he thought he could get away with something... I shudder to think about what he might do. No, I'm not saying he'll be the next shooter, or a rapist, or anything, but he does have some issues that he probably should be getting help for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back