Orbiter DarkSydePhil A-Logs General - Infighting and Cringe Galore (Sons of Kojima, et al)

Will suprczy actually file a lolsuit against Philip Paul Burnell?

  • Yes

    Votes: 34 18.2%
  • No

    Votes: 164 87.7%

  • Total voters
    187
OK as you wish. They got taken down, on the count of many reports, I wasn't the only one. and that they had people in our chat constantly shilling the podcast. It was not a fraudulent report.
It got taken down and it was a good reason for it.
The reason so many people flagged it was that they where using stuff phil had just streamed. They can not do that.

And the SoK addressed all of this with you. They were using a YouTube video. They can do that. Fair use. And from what I recall, you were the only one who reported them. The only reason for the report was because you didn't like them, and because of your preconceived notions about who they are and what they do. You admitted you had no proof they did anything which is why Twitch restored their channel. They told you they were going to send what you said to Twitch, and I guess they did.

Abusing a report system to get someone taken down because they were using someone's content under fair use is just silly and bad form old chap.
 
Last edited:
If it wasn't fraudulent then why was the channel restored?
Have you heard about getting a warning before?

And the SoK addressed all of this with you. They were using a YouTube video. They can do that. Fair use. And from what I recall, you were the only one who reported them. The only reason for the reports were because you didn't like them, and because of your preconceived notions. You admitted you had no proof they did anything which is why Twitch restored their channel. They told you they were going to send what you said to Twitch, and I guess they did.

Abusing a report system to get someone taken down because they were using someone's content under fair use is just silly and bad form old chap.

Shut the fuck up and sit down. It's was just streamed on twitch, and when it is defamation it's no longer "Fair use" Because of the nature of who the SOK is.
 
Shut the fuck up and sit down. It's was just streamed on twitch, and when it is defamation it's no longer "Fair use" Because of the nature of who the SOK is.
Wow, no need for that language.
steamsalty
Threadban when? Oh, and your claim of people advertising their podcast in Phil's stream has absolutely no bearing on anything and is not a valid reason to report them. The SoK is not responsible for what their fans do. If their fans go and advertise, you can't blame and report the SoK without evidence that they told their fans to do that. And you had no evidence of such.

The "nature of the SoK" also has no bearing on anything. You keep pulling that excuse out of your ass, yet it still means absolutely nothing. No offence BSV, as I really don't know you aside from your appearance on the SoK podcast, and from this exchange, but you are quite a delusional individual.

Edit: Oh and it's not defamation either. It's valid criticism. People are allowed to criticize. It's called free speech buddy. Just because you (in your delusional Candyland mind) think it's defamation, doesn't make it so.
 
Last edited:
Wow, no need for that language.
steamsalty
Threadban when? Oh, and your claim of people advertising their podcast in Phil's stream has absolutely no bearing on anything and is not a valid reason to report them. The SoK is not responsible for what their fans do. If their fans go and advertise, you can't blame and report the SoK without evidence that they told their fans to do that. And you had no evidence of such.

The "nature of the SoK" also has no bearing on anything. You keep pulling that excuse out of your ass, yet it still means absolutely nothing. No offence BSV, as I really don't know you aside from your appearance on the SoK podcast, and from this exchange, but you are quite a delusional individual.

Oh stop it you dumb fuck. I am just saying when fans of the SOK come in to phils stream and sell the stream, people will know. And they would probably go ahead and report the SOK.
Because they see phils face on their stream which they just saw streamed a few hours earlier.

And yes "the nature of the sok" matters. Because they are always inherently negative to phil. They cannot just use his stream unedited while they talk shit about him. That is not fair use!
Why do you make yourselves dumb assholes just because you don't like phil?
You would rather masturbate to king of pol, and the SOK. And you think that is ok. this just floors me completely
 
Oh stop it you dumb fuck.
Real nice. I've been nothing but professional and you've resorted to childish insults.
I am just saying when fans of the SOK come in to phils stream and sell the stream, people will know. And they would probably go ahead and report the SOK.
You admitted to reporting them. You. Not people.
Because they see phils face on their stream which they just saw streamed a few hours earlier.
So what? It was from a YouTube video, they weren't screen-capturing and live-restreaming Phil's stream. Fair use. Welcome to the world of copyright law.
And yes "the nature of the sok" matters.
No it doesn't. You're delusional.
Because they are always inherently negative to phil.
Valid criticism. How often is Phil negative to people BSV? How often does he shit-talk YouTube's programmers or YouTube itself? Or Pewdiepie? All the fucking time. He shit talks his opponents in online fighting games all the while spewing out excuses about why he lost. He calls other YouTubers clowns for how they conduct themselves on stream, then turns around and acts like a clown on his own stream because he's gotta make that Twitch fuck-money. Phil is 10x as negative as the SoK, and 98% of the things he says are inherently false/incorrect/stupid.
They cannot just use his stream unedited while they talk shit about him. That is not fair use!
That is exactly fair use you dolt. It's valid constructive criticism. They used a YouTube video someone had uploaded, which is 100% fair use. What aren't you getting about this?
Why do you make yourselves dumb assholes just because you don't like phil?
I'm sorry, how are we being dumb assholes? I'd like to think we're the voice of reason in all this, and you sir are being the quote "dumb asshole".
You would rather masturbate to king of pol, and the SOK. And you think that is ok. this just floors me completely
Who the hell is the king of pol? I know of the SoK though, as I enjoy long-format videos on YouTube. I especially enjoy relaxing outside on my patio after work, bong in hand, watching a good 1 to 2 hour long YouTube video.
 
Last edited:
That is exactly fair use you dolt. It's valid constructive criticism. They used a YouTube video someone had uploaded, which is 100% fair use. What aren't you getting about this?
No it isn't that is defamation. Read about it, if it is fair use goes out the window. You are a dumb fuck. And I am out of there. I can't have a discussion with people, that don't know shit about what they are talking about.
 
No it isn't that is defamation. Read about it, if it is fair use goes out the window.
It's not defamation, it's valid criticism.
You are a dumb fuck.
Real nice. Again, I've tried to be extremely professional with you and this is what I get in response. Delusion and profanity.
And I am out of there.
I think you meant "I am out of here." Either way;
I can't have a discussion with people, that don't know shit about what they are talking about.
I guess you must have tried talking to yourself and given up then.
 
No it isn't that is defamation. Read about it, if it is fair use goes out the window. You are a dumb fuck. And I am out of there. I can't have a discussion with people, that don't know shit about what they are talking about.
They use the same logic Phil does when he claims his LPs are fair use. Either both of them are wrong or both of them are right. And the fact that Phil's work doubles as porn for you does not affect fair use laws.
 
Just a thought. We saw Fred sperg out at Burn over Ardnas. Fred cried and claimed he had blackmail. Former SoK members flat out critcize the group openly and nothing happens. Moonman @motivatedmalc ,Che and Renegade have crticized them not to mention Che and moonman spoke their minds about Doper without any backlash publicly.

Do they have something on the SoK or Fred ?. SoK don't handle criticism well and certain people can criticize them without any response. Same thing happened with the monetize "issue". TXT got called out but they are scared to say anything about Tevin. I'm starting to think the SoK has tons of internet skeletons in the closet that can come out at anytime
 
Last edited:
Just a thought. We saw Fred sperg out at Burn over Ardnas. Fred cried and claimed he had blackmail. Former SoK members flat out critcize the group openly and nothing happens. Moonman @motivatedmalc ,Che and Renegade have crticized them. Che and moonman spoke their minds about Doper without any backlash publicly.

Do they have something on the SoK or Fred ?. SoK don't handle criticism well and certain people can criticise them without any response. Same thing happened with the monetize "issue". TXT got called out but they are scared to say anything about Tevin. I'm starting to think the SoK has tons of internet skeletons in the closet that can come out at anytime
That's a strong possibility but I think it's also likely that the SoK is just too scared to go after anyone with a big following. It's easy forget but they got a lot of backlash over the Ardnas stuff and at least Fred was salty as fuck over it.
 
That is most likely true . They do take themselves way too seriously. I think they would get tons of backlash if they called out Tevin. People like him! I think its a bit of both. I watch tihydp videos. Lets endures and Tevins long videos are awful.

That's a strong possibility but I think it's also likely that the SoK is just too scared to go after anyone with a comparable or bigger following. It's easy forget but they got a lot of backlash over the Ardnas stuff and at least Fred was salty as fuck over it.
 
How did the verified on BSV's account happen? Did someone ring his phone only for it to be answered by a scared crying minor?
 
Do they have something on the SoK or Fred ?. SoK don't handle criticism well and certain people can criticize them without any response. Same thing happened with the monetize "issue". TXT got called out but they are scared to say anything about Tevin. I'm starting to think the SoK has tons of internet skeletons in the closet that can come out at anytime

I remember once Burn told me that Fred said the mission of the SoK is to take down DSP, at any cost. Which it honestly does feel like. It's not just a group of people ridiculing a man it's a group of obsessive stalkers that screencap and talk about everything DSP does (while acting just like him also) for hours on end. Tragic, honestly.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FunnY
How can this city feel safe when the ones wearing the capes don't even know the law of the land? What kind of maniac claims something is illegal or against the rules and doesn't even know what the laws or the rules are?

Making fun of people and calling them bad names is perfectly fine on Twitch, as well as youtube. If it wasn't, 99% of the videos and streams would be cut off in an instant. The main thing that isn't allowed on Twitch is for one Twitch streamer to stream the Twitch stream of another Twitch streamer. It sounds complicated and confusing, and that must be exactly why it's not allowed.

The perpetrators of streaming another person's Twitch stream happen to be: The SoK and The Almighty Tevin. Egad, what evil has befouled this already toxic community, like a big stinky Mexican diaper of hypocrisy thrown into the trash bin of moral high ground.

If the two groups stick to the shadows of the Hitbox sewer, then they are free to do as they may with their robbed content of DSP streams. But the second they move the manhole and try to return to the scene of the crime, there's going to be the ban Mjölnir waiting for them, and rightfully so.

This just goes to show, crime doesn't pay unless you disguise it as a water charity, and evil never wins, unless you move the goal post and define winning as continuing to make content about DSP and have it as your highlight. Because at the end of the day, all Phil has to do is buy a game and play it to make his living, while everyone against him scurry around like oil-coated rats on a burning sinking ship.

The SoK would gladly move on to another target, but they've been on easy mode for nearly 3 years and still haven't been able to get past the first level. Every time they pull a bamboozle on DSP during his streams, it only brings DSP more cash and makes them look like high schools who have dropped out of high school. Perhaps, if the SoK remove their pedestal from below their feet, they can move on to more important and interesting targets to hate upon, but until then, they are stuck on easy mode like DSP when he was playing the cliffs of madness level in God of War. Imagine that segment, but expanded into 3 years and have it be a team effort.

If there is a word that means more than madness, this is a perfect time to use it. But instead I can only express the insanity that is the SoK's purpose as "maddy mad madness to the mad power times mad with madness on top".

As for Tevin, he should do what any non-black man would be happy to do, and get a job. A job he can be proud of! A job he can show to his beautiful neighbors and say "Hey, you naysayers, I have money, so stop clutching your purse when I walk by at night!"

I doubt he can say that now, no matter his support on Twitch or Hitbox. At this rate, those fans will waft away like a fart made of stolen content in front of the fan of Twitch Terms of Service. It's only in due time. Will Tevin change his evil ways, or will he just dye his hair a more flamboyant color for views that won't matter in the end?

To be continued...
 
As for Tevin, he should do what any non-black man would be happy to do, and get a job. A job he can be proud of! A job he can show to his beautiful neighbors and say "Hey, you naysayers, I have money, so stop clutching your purse when I walk by at night!"
If he walks by at night do they even see him?
 
Back