Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

Jerry is comparing modern politics to Star Wars because of course he would.

Will be posting archives and links later.

Screenshot_20170830-153819.png
Screenshot_20170830-153842.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingJ
I think by having a "nuanced" conflict, he means that every battle against Ryder has to play like the most complicated match of the hardest strategy RPG you've ever played. And if you do one thing that is covered in Ryder's list of resistances, it's an automatic loss for you, since Ryder is Jerry's precious self-insert some kind of god, I think. And this is assuming that we don't use a character who can bypass Ryder's "immunity", like Dr. Fate, Doctor Strange, Samurai Jack, Magik, et al.

Hmm. Reminds me of his interactions with other people online. They could be getting along nicely, and then BOOM, they say that the wage gap isn't based on sexism, and suddenly they're a Nazi misogynist.

Now that would be interesting, a fight more about strategy then anything else and a battle of minds. However the problem with this is that it's used on a character that can literally do anything. These strategy fights works when the characters are basically equals or when a weaker character outsmarts an infinitely stronger one. Now these would technically fit for Jerry character, if it wasn't for a fact that Ryder is literally perfect in everything. His power allow him to literally do anything, he's the most strategic out of everyone, and know all the weaknesses. By definition he isn't supposes to lose and anything that can beat him is just the plot demanding it. It's basically like putting a human against God himself, you can't win no matter what. That's why when writers make a strong character, there's usually an imperfection. Like a strong and calculating villain, but with an arrogance that makes him blind to something he would have notice normally. Jerry character is void of any of that. And Ryder literally died by just being overflowed with some type of magic, which shouldn't even be a problem since he could killed his opponent with one attack and the opponent in question wasn't smarter or even stronger then him. I laugh every time that he thinks he wrote something good at all with a character that literally win everything, but the plot demanding he lose is what makes lose is somehow "nuanced".
 
It's been demonstrated numerous times that lolcows completely lack self-awareness.
But it takes a truly special cow to truly score negative points in self-awareness.

That's our Lily!

Talking about self-awareness level in the negative

http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/164850280815/i-saw-someone-in-the-dream-daddy-tag-say-that
(archive gives me this log-in page instead of the actual page)
upload_2017-9-1_14-18-33.png

upload_2017-9-1_14-18-57.png

So basically
If you think you’re a scary person for triggering an unconscious reflex then you are the very definition of pathetic.

Thanks for describing yourself ^^
 
Anthony just released a new HNTB with Brittany's "interview" taking up the last 20 or so minutes. If anyone wants to archive that part that'd be lovely.

I was gonna write that I suspect he won't say anything because she mentions Tara and stockholm and the WoW incident, but that video was uploaded well over 9 hours ago. He did say something. And like I fucking expected it to be its outright denial.
upload_2017-9-1_13-25-45.png

upload_2017-9-1_13-26-17.png

http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/164856276235/are-there-any-lessons-to-be-gained-from-the-kp/embed
https://archive.is/pO8fv

When Blake said Britt was going onto FNGRs cast I knew this shit was going to happen because Anthony basically set her up to fail- It's interesting that Anthony now takes interest in the /cow/ threads once bug spray came out but not enough to do his homework- Throughout the interview his response is along the lines of "yeah I heard about that but I never looked into it (laugh)". The interview is a black screen, no screencaps or links are ever shown.

Wanna know the real kicker? If he had looked into this shit when he was first made aware of it two years ago instead of making a video whining about /cow/ "harrassing lily peet", he probably wouldn't be the subject of 5 lolcow threads with leaks of his group collapsing and constant discussion about getting cucked at bronycon by a plushie rapist.

Anyone who saw what happened with the stolen art saga should've seen this coming a mile away.
 
Anthony just released a new HNTB with Brittany's "interview" taking up the last 20 or so minutes. If anyone wants to archive that part that'd be lovely.

I was gonna write that I suspect he won't say anything because she mentions Tara and stockholm and the WoW incident, but that video was uploaded well over 9 hours ago. He did say something. And like I fucking expected it to be its outright denial.
View attachment 272332
View attachment 272333
http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/164856276235/are-there-any-lessons-to-be-gained-from-the-kp/embed
https://archive.is/pO8fv

When Blake said Britt was going onto FNGRs cast I knew this shit was going to happen because Anthony basically set her up to fail- It's interesting that Anthony now takes interest in the /cow/ threads once bug spray came out but not enough to do his homework- Throughout the interview his response is along the lines of "yeah I heard about that but I never looked into it (laugh)". The interview is a black screen, no screencaps or links are ever shown.

Wanna know the real kicker? If he had looked into this shit when he was first made aware of it two years ago instead of making a video whining about /cow/ "harrassing lily peet", he probably wouldn't be the subject of 5 lolcow threads with leaks of his group collapsing and constant discussion about getting cucked at bronycon by a plushie rapist.

Anyone who saw what happened with the stolen art saga should've seen this coming a mile away.

Everything about Jerry's post just screams "guilty party" at me. All of his logic is overly-specific garbage that shows people are clearly getting to him. But instead of analyzing any of it, I just want to point this out right here because it's honestly kind of a fucked up thing to say, no matter who you are.

"And even if you do have proof, that proof has to be RELEVANT. “This person abused me seven years ago” is not relevant. These kind of stories have a shelf life and seven years is a long time for things to change."

You're not allowed to confess that someone has abused you unless you do it right away, psychological scars and fear of consequences be damned.

Well fuck me, that got dark real quick.
 
Jerry Peet said:
Grudge-nursing rumor mongers don’t care because they live in an echo chamber where every shred of information is just more of a reason to scream about people.

Something something mirror, something something glass houses. Can't Jerry say anything that also doesn't apply to him, too?
 
Yeah his justification for this information not being worth anyone's time is really suspect. "Oh it happened two years ago so this information is moot" is BS especially considering what happened in those two years.

There's a difference between having a small and dumb slapfight and making up 15 minutes later and being a hebephile who made up a fake human being and fleshed her out enough so that you could toy with your friends emotions and act out on depraved sexual desires only then to have a small and dumb slapfight that causes you to burn bridges over World of Warcraft. Guess which of those wounds is capable of being healed of by time?

If what Jerry was saying was actually true, this thread wouldn't be the forth most viewed thread in animal control and the 20th most viewed lolcow thread on the farms. Same thing goes for his accusations of defamation and slander- as Null put it,
"Part of what makes us so popular, and what makes people with threads so angry, is that the overwhelming majority of the site's content is factually accurate. If the site were just complete nonsense, no one would be as bothered by having their name on it. It is that the content and claims made on the site are usually very well documented which drives people mad."
 
"And even if you do have proof, that proof has to be RELEVANT. “This person abused me seven years ago” is not relevant. These kind of stories have a shelf life and seven years is a long time for things to change."

You're not allowed to confess that someone has abused you unless you do it right away, psychological scars and fear of consequences be damned.
Yeah his justification for this information not being worth anyone's time is really suspect. "Oh it happened two years ago so this information is moot" is BS especially considering what happened in those two years.
It's this point right here that really gets me, and really shows his guilt.

He can go on and on about rape victims and how false accusations never happen and how "not guilty" doesn't equal "didn't rape", but just now he's denying someone's personal testimony because it's towards him? Because they (probably haphazardly) went on the first medium they could find that happened to be that of a lunatic like Aguilar?

It really looks like he's going against his own inherent radfem principles just to dodge "rumors" and berate Anthony. All he's doing is making people afraid to come forward if they had, as you said, pent-up psychological scars and a fear of consequences for reporting someone who abused them years ago, because "that proof has to be RELEVANT." Never mind if it's absolutely true (which, evidence shows that all the "rumors" about Jerry are), your story has no credibility on the very basis that it happened a long time ago.

Something to consider: What if one of his fans came out and asked him what they should do about their ex-boyfriend that raped them, but got away with it? Would he tell them "it happened too long ago, get over it", or "Report him. The accusation alone will be enough to ruin his life"? He's really in a no-win situation in this case because if he chooses the former, he'll get shit on by his fans... probably. If he chooses the latter, it shows that he's purposefully being inconsistent with his principle in an effort to discredit firsthand testimony (with screenshots we have no reason to believe are doctored) from someone who's actually been in a relationship with him. Unfortunately his fans are too stupid to think for themselves, and won't pick that up.

...Of course, that's pretty inconsistent with the beliefs of a typical feminist (and I don't mean that in a derogatory way). Imagine if it came out that some random celebrity raped someone in high school. Do you think Jerry would wanna give him the same "30 years is a long time for things to change!", or would he just screech "He has to be prosecuted!"? In fact, what were his thoughts about the whole Bill Cosby rape scandal?

TL;DR Jerry's denial shows his guilt.
inb4 "it doesn't matter what I do, the rumor-mongers will always find a way to hate me!"
 
Last edited:

It's really too bad that Youtube doesn't allow those kinds of screenshots into a video but Brittany did want to give proof of them.

Inb4 "The farms are just pathetic attention whores who fabricate evidence" (Yeah, Jerry, that's why we have THREE kinds of proof: a link to your Tumblr, an archived link and a screenshot)
 
Inb4 "The farms are just pathetic attention whores who fabricate evidence"
He's already said that. Multiple times.

I think he just doesn't want people coming here to learn anything negative about him, so he'll outright lie and say the nastiest shit about us in order to discredit us. He hasn't ever directly addressed our points because he knows we're right with most everything we say.
 
Also, I just noticed:
And even if you do have proof, that proof has to be RELEVANT. "This person abused me seven years ago" is not relevant. These kinds of stories have a shelf life and seven years is a long time for things to change.

Unless I've somehow went into hibernation for a very long time... 2015 wasn't 7 years ago. The events with Britt in particular only just turned 2 about a week ago.

He just fabricated an entire narrative before our very eyes.
 
Even considering the fact Britney's testimony was ruined by going to Aguilar, Jerry has STILL entered damage control mode, to the point where he's flagrantly going against his own morals and is fabricating stories just to dodge these accusations.
 
At this point, I'm fairly certain that we can declare Jerry as being insane enough to have "Sagas" written about him a la our Lord and Savior Chris-Chan (Praise be to Sonichu). He gets hung up about things so often and for such an unnecessary amount of time that I feel it's somewhat warranted.


This thing lasts any longer, we got ourselves a "Brittany" Saga, what a fucking loon.
 
http://lily-peet.tumblr.com/post/164865099210/authoritarian-now-thats-just-ridiculous-the/embed
http://archive.is/1o5pf
upload_2017-9-1_19-13-45.png

I think this anon is new to Jerry's Tumblr and/or has never paid attention.

To say from the top of my head: he had a video literally saying "Your opinion is wrong and that's okay" where he said that your opinion doesn't matter because everyone is retarded except Jerry.
And Bug Spray and Artist Meltdown Saga were both call-out videos where his herd of cockroaches went to hunt down both FNGR and AnimeChristy respectively.
 
So I just got done watching the HNTB episodewith Brittany in it, and it seems like FNGR is on some new medication that's lowered his autism and cuckoldery levels. Either that, or he's trying to rip off Mister Metokur's mannerisms. Either way, since this has sent Jerry into Damage Control mode, I'm considering keeping him there by going on FNGR myself and repeating the stories I told It Came from the Internet. Does anyone have a problem with that?
 
So I just got done watching the HNTB episodewith Brittany in it, and it seems like FNGR is on some new medication that's lowered his autism and cuckoldery levels. Either that, or he's trying to rip off Mister Metokur's mannerisms. Either way, since this has sent Jerry into Damage Control mode, I'm considering keeping him there by going on FNGR myself and repeating the stories I told It Came from the Internet. Does anyone have a problem with that?
Judging by his response to Brittany just now, I doubt it would be wise if you want to turn people against Jerry, since if he got one thing right, it's that FNGR and his fanbase don't come off as the smartest people on the block, and I don't think Jerry would trust your words any more than someone who posts on /cow/'s, much less Brittany's, and thus the same "don't trust the words of people who hate me!" raging would go off.

You can do you, but I personally wouldn't recommend it. Maybe find another similar medium?
 
Back