- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
Not to mention it was the early 1900's, and calling themselves good friends or just simply living together is not really the same freedom lesbians have today in the USA. There were still laws, still major hangups -I really doubt that rich closeted lesbian would have risked being with the poor butch lesbian back, unhappy marriage to a man or not. Like, it was a totally different era with different societal expectations that shaped people, and being with a poor dude was way different then being with a poor woman, especially one so obviously lesbian. That would have gotten Rose lobotomized or something.
One of the biggest pet peeves I have about that site is how they'll take a historical story and make it gay but ignore how society was with gay people in the past when it'd be obviously inaccurate. It wouldn't end happily, most likely. The sad story would be that hypothetically the young woman would stay in a loveless marriage. It doesn't work.