Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
Well, ackchyually, let's let these teenagers tell us why we're wrong:
20171214_161033.png

20171214_161052.png

20171214_161115.png


Do we have a gloating children thread for this? We probably should.
 
I have specifics, but I've been down this road and it doesn't matter. You'll just say, "I don't care about that at all" or "nuh uh, they won't do that sort of thing because that's not what I imagine an ISP doing!" So just mark my post as "dumb," feel better about yourself for a split second and going back to rabble rousing about how the internet was on the cusp of $500/month tiered packages because reddit's administrators told you so. Also, part of the problem is defining NN anyway, bandwidth, latency, blocking website, throttling, etc.
Really? I'm skeptical.

As I understand it, if Netflix shows up and drops a deal on Comcast's lap for them to prioritize their traffic an extra 10%, the only thing keeping Comcast from taking that deal is their status as a common carrier. By all rights, Comcast should take that deal. Hell, they might even have a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders to take it. (I mean, probably not, but I wouldn't rule it out...)

Is there something I'm missing here?
It is fun watching the impotent nerd rage though.
I don't think the nerd rage here is all that impotent. There's some heavy hitters on the pro-NN side. I'm not optimistic about the anti-NN side's chances.
Either way, I fully expect Trump to be just as affected as everyone else.
As controversial as he is, I could see him changing his tune on NN once he realizes that it only benefits MSM
I don't know about that. I think the right people have already whispered "profit and competition" in Trump's ear and he's sold on NN being a bad thing.
 
I'm now hearing people have doxxed Ajit Pai and his family. Their emails and private numbers are now out in public.

Oh boy.
He really should have seen this coming when the "your father killed democracy" signs started coming that the internet never forgets or forgives.

I don't know about that. I think the right people have already whispered "profit and competition" in Trump's ear and he's sold on NN being a bad thing.
It's possible they only mentioned the words they wanted him to hear and deliberately forgot to tell him the part that "you'll be giving us your money too, sorry 'bout that".
 
It's possible they only mentioned the words they wanted him to hear and deliberately forgot to tell him the part that "you'll be giving us your money too, sorry 'bout that".
The end user won't really be paying for the loss of net neutrality. It's going to be more private companies paying ISPs to prioritize their traffic.

Big companies can handle that just fine. But small sites like KF will fall by the wayside. Trump won't be paying anything.
 
Not as long as CNN and the other news sites keep posting news about every little thing he does.

Though if someone were to tell him that he can't shitpost on twitter without paying out his ass to ISPs. He'd probably listen.

But as Null said, that's only if it's a bill, which it isn't. Either way, I fully expect Trump to be just as affected as everyone else.

They post news about every little thing he does because he's the president of the United States. CNN is biased, obviously, but Trump expecting not to be scrutinized when he holds one of the most important political positions on the planet is ridiculous.

I don't think he would care about the repeal of net neutrality even if he fully understood the consequences. Pai is a guy he appointed and who he thinks actually knows enough about communications to have authority on it. I'm thinking he's going to side with Pai either way.

It would be kind of an ironic turn, given that the political polarization as a result of social media is basically why he got elected.
 
They post news about every little thing he does because he's the president of the United States. CNN is biased, obviously, but Trump expecting not to be scrutinized when he holds one of the most important political positions on the planet is ridiculous.

I don't think he would care about the repeal of net neutrality even if he fully understood the consequences. Pai is a guy he appointed and who he thinks actually knows enough about communications to have authority on it. I'm thinking he's going to side with Pai either way.

It would be kind of an ironic turn, given that the political polarization as a result of social media is basically why he got elected.
Two things:
1. Did CNN really need to make an article about how Trump drinks water? What's next, them making an article about how he pisses? You have to admit that there are limits to what should and shouldn't be reported regarding the presidency.
2. Obama put Pai in the FCC, Trump merely promoted him. If anything both sides have something to answer for when it comes to Pajit's stupidity.
 
Back