Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then you need to read the twitter history more. This is someone that has repeatedly and consistently flown around the place and mentioned the plans for a baby well in advance.

I get the concept of a happily married escort with a child is very alien to a lot of people, but she seems happy enough and her life story (besides DSP) doesn't have to make anyone else happy.
No that is not it!
I have experience with small babies and mothers. When the baby is very little you can't travel very far for extended periods of time. The first year you can't just be away for extended periods of time. That is what I am trying to say.
That is regardless of whatever occupation you have. A baby needs it's mother when it is an infant.
That is why most mothers are unable to work as normal.
I belive escorts can have a perfectly normal life. And why the story doesn't make sense.
 
No that is not it!
I have experience with small babies and mothers. When the baby is very little you can't travel very far for extended periods of time. The first year you can't just be away for extended periods of time. That is what I am trying to say.
That is regardless of whatever occupation you have. A baby needs it's mother when it is an infant.
That is why most mothers are unable to work as normal.
I belive escorts can have a perfectly normal life. And why the story doesn't make sense.
psst there is a husband, that can take care of the infant, that can use formula.
You clearly then have not enough experience, considering that there are gay male couples that have a woman using a carrying womb and that the child grows up completely fine without mommy being there.

Edit: Also I would be happy for my partner to take care of our baby, if I was making more money than him.
 
Now you missing the bigger picture - she's not threatening to reveal compromising information because she wants money from him. She's is threatening to reveal compromising information because he needs to pay what he fucking owes. What recourse does an escort have when her John doesn't pay up for her services? She's gonna destroy him (by either calling in someone to physically intimidate) or destroy his reputation as both are persuasive.

That's the thing. They are the same. They both involve paying someone off to avoid some form of personal damage. If Kim is short $3,000 she is fine. If Phil doesn't pay her, he isn't. See how tipped the scale is here?

She can just as easily eat the loss, never see him again, and warn the other girls not to do business with him. But she isn't doing that. She is publicly being vindictive about this.

Her fucking for money is a point I keep brining up for all fronts isn't because of personal views I may or may not have about it. It is because this is a profession she chose that has risks as well as a moral stigma from many other people. I can be fine with it and even partake where my neighbor might want her locked up.

The broader picture that I am looking at here is that she is greedy and scummy as well. It doesn't matter if she is as bad as Phil or not. I personally don't think that she is. But this kind of behavior shouldn't be praised.
 
No that is not it!
I have experience with small babies and mothers. When the baby is very little you can't travel very far for extended periods of time. The first year you can't just be away for extended periods of time. That is what I am trying to say.
That is regardless of whatever occupation you have. A baby needs it's mother when it is an infant.
That is why most mothers are unable to work as normal.
I belive escorts can have a perfectly normal life. And why the story doesn't make sense.

What about infants whose mothers die during labor?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_who_died_in_childbirth

Anyway, what you're talking about has no real answer, and if someone went against what you say is "sensible" advice about how they should live it wouldn't matter, because they can do it anyway.
 
No that is not it!
I have experience with small babies and mothers. When the baby is very little you can't travel very far for extended periods of time. The first year you can't just be away for extended periods of time. That is what I am trying to say.
That is regardless of whatever occupation you have. A baby needs it's mother when it is an infant.
That is why most mothers are unable to work as normal.
I belive escorts can have a perfectly normal life. And why the story doesn't make sense.
Not to dogpile on you, but I started back to work (part-time) when my baby was 2 weeks old, and still breastfed, and his father was a stay at home dad from when he was 3 months to just over a year. Choosing different life paths isn't as uncommon as you think.
Edit: Also I would be happy for my partner to take care of our baby, if I was making more money than him.
For this exact reason, in fact!
 
She can just as easily eat the loss, never see him again, and warn the other girls not to do business with him. But she isn't doing that. She is publicly being vindictive about this.

Her fucking for money is a point I keep brining up for all fronts isn't because of personal views I may or may not have about it. It is because this is a profession she chose that has risks as well as a moral stigma from many other people. I can be fine with it and even partake where my neighbor might want her locked up.

The broader picture that I am looking at here is that she is greedy and scummy as well. It doesn't matter if she is as bad as Phil or not. I personally don't think that she is. But this kind of behavior shouldn't be praised.

Dude, stop getting angry. Would you do a freelance job and just "eat the loss" if you could do something about it? I wouldn't eat a loss of a couple grand for any job. How is it greedy to demand the money you are owed for a service?

It's when you say stuff like that that really makes me think you are pulling in some issues you have about prostitution or women or something. Go get some air. Go take a walk.
 
That's the thing. They are the same. They both involve paying someone off to avoid some form of personal damage. If Kim is short $3,000 she is fine. If Phil doesn't pay her, he isn't. See how tipped the scale is here?

She can just as easily eat the loss, never see him again, and warn the other girls not to do business with him. But she isn't doing that. She is publicly being vindictive about this.

Her fucking for money is a point I keep brining up for all fronts isn't because of personal views I may or may not have about it. It is because this is a profession she chose that has risks as well as a moral stigma from many other people. I can be fine with it and even partake where my neighbor might want her locked up.

The broader picture that I am looking at here is that she is greedy and scummy as well. It doesn't matter if she is as bad as Phil or not. I personally don't think that she is. But this kind of behavior shouldn't be praised.

AFAIK the contract probably states that the NDA element is null and void in the case of non-payment. Meaning the escort's recourse is to warn other people about a client who doesn't pay. The client is the person who counter signs this contract, thereby agreeing to this term (whether its legally binding or not doesn't really matter unless someone wants to take it to court, I'm assuming this was the equivalent of a "handshake deal" but in writing)

If he didn't want those terms, he shouldn't have signed the contract. Even so, that doesn't really make it legally binding, but it doesn't really matter, you should go and read the Oxford Handbook for Economics of Prostitution:
upload_2017-12-22_14-41-38-png.340001


Due to the illegal nature of escorting these contracts are fairly hard to enforce as has been discussed multiple times, that doesn't mean they don't exist or that people don't sign them.
 
No that is not it!
I have experience with small babies and mothers. When the baby is very little you can't travel very far for extended periods of time. The first year you can't just be away for extended periods of time. That is what I am trying to say.
That is regardless of whatever occupation you have. A baby needs it's mother when it is an infant.
That is why most mothers are unable to work as normal.
I belive escorts can have a perfectly normal life. And why the story doesn't make sense.
Breast m.ilk can be pumped and stored in the freezer and it's good for a year..women who work dont feed from the tit because they cannot, they pump.
 
psst there is a husband, that can take care of the infant, that can use formula.
You clearly then have not enough experience, considering that there are gay male couples that have a woman using a carrying womb and that the child grows up completely fine without mommy being there.

Edit: Also I would be happy for my partner to take care of our baby, if I was making more money than him.
When you adopt a baby you are really irresponsible if you do that before one year of age.
It's probably not unheard of doing that using supplements for the child. But that is really unhealthy for the child.
And this is not a case of adoption.
If you say a escort works as normal flying around the world and just ignores her infant child. Well then she is a no good whore. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
 
When you adopt a baby you are really irresponsible if you do that before one year of age.
It's probably not unheard of doing that using supplements for the child. But that is really unhealthy for the child.
And this is not a case of adoption.
If you say a escort works as normal flying around the world and just ignores her infant child. Well then she is a no good whore. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
You really live up to your avatar I have to say because youre having one right now.
 
It's probably not unheard of doing that using supplements for the child. But that is really unhealthy for the child.
lol ok

you do know that some woman don't produce enough breast m.ilk sometimes, or may have other complications that don't allow them to breastfeed their child.

i promise a child will not grow up a raging autist if they are fed formula. formula companies work pretty hard to get baby formula as close as possible to breast m.ilk.
 
Im just waiting for a picture or something concrete. All these tweets and blog post seems like she's going the extra mile to try and verify her claims without concrete proof. The 5 escorts sounds kind of fucking crazy. Remember Phil didn't even want to pay his own best friends who helped him make money, now he's flying all these women to his house while not being able to trophy them around like he did Leanna on the internet?

My theory is she might of got some incriminating DMs from DSP on a late gin filled night and she is just trying to either blackmail or troll him. And the fact that @neger psykolog is starting to be suspicious himself when he has seen more info than us makes me question things too.

But whatever, I'm enjoying this all for what it's worth.
 
That's the thing. They are the same. They both involve paying someone off to avoid some form of personal damage. If Kim is short $3,000 she is fine. If Phil doesn't pay her, he isn't. See how tipped the scale is here?

She can just as easily eat the loss, never see him again, and warn the other girls not to do business with him. But she isn't doing that. She is publicly being vindictive about this.
There's a difference here, one is agreeing a price for a service, then neglecting to pay it once said service is rendered, the other is someone threatening harm over a payment that wasn't agreed.

Keep in mind that not even Phil is claiming to be blackmailed, so why should we?

Her fucking for money is a point I keep brining up for all fronts isn't because of personal views I may or may not have about it. It is because this is a profession she chose that has risks as well as a moral stigma from many other people. I can be fine with it and even partake where my neighbor might want her locked up.
Personally, I am against prostitution, but that doesn't color my judgement because I don't let it. You seem to be doing this.

Though I acknowledge your earlier point about confirmation bias, I am actively fighting my own, but Phil really isn't giving us anything to defend his side aside from empty accusations of lying and blaming it on detractors.

The broader picture that I am looking at here is that she is greedy and scummy as well. It doesn't matter if she is as bad as Phil or not. I personally don't think that she is. But this kind of behavior shouldn't be praised.
It is only praised as far as people LMAOing about the possible implications of it being true, and at Phil producing quality milk as a result.

Hell, even if it isn't true, it's also Phil's fault for lying so many damn times that people are willing to take an escort's word against his lol. It's the boy who cried wolf in a way.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: neger psykolog
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back