- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
What differentiates you from an anarcho-syndicalist?
Dramacow Dustin Cavanaugh / Xsquader - Public nuisance, GameFAQs sperg, convicted felon
- Thread starter Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
What differentiates you from an anarcho-syndicalist?
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
You do realize that apartment complexes can set whatever rules they like as long as they don't violate the Constitution? There's no right to smoke pot in the Constitution.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
Just wait till the asscrack of dawn and good ol Dustin will have a wall of text ready to 'refute' this and probably call you retarded when he's finished.
Hasn't even been a week that he's been sperging out here and this guy's already become predictable.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
You mean "causation". Furthermore, your response is baseless conjecture you pulled out of your ass, as you are making a false equivalence that junkies must be stupid inherently, and on top of that, I simply gave some information. If these idiots (if that includes you so be it) here do not understand it then that is not my problem. I simply provide the information, I cannot force the proper interpretation. Understand, my opinion of this community is that it is filled with a bunch of illiterate hypocrites. So far my hypothesis has been repeatedly supported. Funny enough, y'all make these threads to troll others and at the end of the day, most of these people "trolling" are bigger autistic twits than the people they talk shit about. It is ironic as hell.
I ignored Cato a while back for making stupid statements that have been refuted already. This one was refuted as an argument within the first couple of pages. I suggest either A. reading, or B. not making retarded ass statements. Number one, they did not find weed, they found cannabis paraphernalia which is lawful in my State and as a result federally exempted as "drug paraphernalia" per title 21 of the US Code. Secondly, I have a medical cannabis recommendation which was provided to me while I was a tenant. This type of housing is mandated to form a written policy for tenants who received certifications while as tenants and are directed to deny those that already have a certification.
Generally speaking, instead of being a jackass making assumptions, you should ask questions to verify your ignorant claims to begin with.
For others who wish to be granted the amazing opportunity of talking to me, if you ask dumb questions and troll like this, I won't answer you and I will be like "Who the fuck is this retarded ass coward" before moving along. I don't think highly of wasting my time on those afraid to utilize their actual identities to begin with. Act like a clown and then you will get none of my time unless you pay the appropriate fee for it. Try again or you can expect to not be responded to unless you provide 20 dollars for 10 minutes.
Last edited:
A
AJ 447
Guest
kiwifarms.net
lmao you act awfully high and mighty for a pedo
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
If ad nauseam repetition of the same tired and unfounded insults are where we are now then I believe that does little more than substantiate my claims of ignorance and possibly illiteracy.
A
AJ 447
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
A
AJ 447
Guest
kiwifarms.net
lol what's wrong @Xsquader aren't you getting enough money with your 
https://my.mixtape.moe/yaeinu.mp3
https://my.mixtape.moe/yaeinu.mp3
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
I wasn't joking dude, I'm genuinely curious, because Anarcho-socialists are a rare breed.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
I don't want to replace capitalism. I just want people to have choices. Anarcho-Syndicalists want Syndicalism to replace Capitalism if I am not mistaken. I don't want to replace capitalism entirely, I just hate it. I want people to be able to live in like-minded societies without government interference unless they are harming someone the government represents and then I feel that the capitalists and socialists can co-exist by simply considering these like-minded socialistic communities as single corporations for the sake of the capitalists and our interactions. This is all strictly hypothetical obviously. I want people to be able to live and not have to worry or suffer and be able to be themselves as long as they do not harm others. We cannot do that with the systems we currently have in place. They need to be reformed. I don't want capitalism to disappear in its entirety. I feel the issues with capitalism can be solved through extreme transparency within large corporations.
For all of this to really make sense I would have to write a short book about it. It is a very complex set of understandings and viewpoints.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
So your ideal would be co-existing systems dependent upon those areas' collective decision?
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
Why are you so pedantic, Dustin?
It doesn't come off as "intelligent" or "enlightened", it just makes your posts a chore to read and your unchecked ego all the more obvious.
It doesn't come off as "intelligent" or "enlightened", it just makes your posts a chore to read and your unchecked ego all the more obvious.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
Libertarianism is about freedom first and foremost. Some people like cutthroat capitalism. Some people just want to live in the forest, smoke weed, and make fires, while playing the guitar. Both of these groups of people should be able to do these things without the government telling them they can't. I'd be a hypocrite to tell a group of like-minded individuals that my group of like-minded individuals wants their freedom but said other group that was not of our mindset cannot have theirs.
You just suck at reading so you find it cognitively draining. Also, your own ego is causing you to project and go on and on about my "ego". Whether I have a large ego or not, why does that bother you so? What does it matter to you?
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
Okay, just intrigued by your political philosophy. You're an odd duck politically.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
Losing focus on a long winded post that amounts to little more than "hurr durr, I em aulwayz rite, see!" does not equal a lack of reading skill. It means you have failed to send out your message in a consise way.
Your ego annoys me because you don't deserve to have one thats so hyperinflated. You smashed your head on a dash board to get out of a ticket, or whatever stupid fucking "injustice" you thought you were being dealt. Thats something a mentally unstable execptional does.
You may be well spoken in text, but that does not automatically equate intellect.
You are a narcisist who gets "enlightened" by fumigating your lungs with your own fecal excretions.
"Projection, projection, projection".
Not every criticism of you is projection, brainlet. Some honest introspection can really do you some good.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
"Losing focus on a long winded post that amounts to little more than "hurr durr, I em aulwayz rite, see!" does not equal a lack of reading skill. It means you have failed to send out your message in a consise way." - That is your prerogative but that doesn't indicate that such a claim is inherently factual.
"Your ego annoys me because you don't deserve to have one thats so hyperinflated. You smashed your head on a dash board to get out of a ticket, or whatever stupid fucking "injustice" you thought you were being dealt. Thats something a mentally unstable execptional does." - I was on medication at that time. Wellbutrin. I often do not respond well to medication. I have not been on medication since then pretty much. Outside of the medical cannabis I have a certification for from a doctor in good standing and who is registered with the pertinent state agencies.
"You may be well spoken in text, but that does not automatically equate intellect." - I didn't say it did. That is also not that attribute that I base my understanding of my own cognitive abilities upon.
"You are a narcisist who gets "enlightened" by fumigating your lungs with your own fecal excretions." - *Narcissist. Two S's after the first "I". Honestly, I prefer when I am proven wrong and run across someone with some sense. Sadly, this is a very rare occurrence.
"
"Projection, projection, projection".
Not every criticism of you is projection, brainlet. Some honest introspection can really do you some good." - But the ones I said were projection were. I didn't say that to everyone now did I? Sometimes people say more than they realize solely in their varying word usage patterns. I spend much more of my day introspecting than most, don't worry. Why do you think I have such a thorough, yet complex, political philosophy?
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2014
What would be proper interpretation of you posting link without context then? What was that you meant by it? Are you alluding that everyone who stays up late, is messy and swears must be more intelligent than your average joe? And on the nature of farms, I think it should be noted that we're really more "point and laugh", than actively trolling people. I mean, we have pretty strict "don't pozload my negholep" -rule, that is enforced(unless the person of interest chooses to come to us). Right on the money that our userbase are autistic twits, though.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
The proper interpretation is not to add extra variables like whether someone is a junky or not. You know damn well they didn't use junkies in their study and weren't talking about them. Also, junkies can be very intelligent, just the same as they were what they were before they were junkies. This doesn't mean they can't fry their brain and become not so though. I just hate to assume all junkies are ignorant because I have seen junkies that seem like they have so much potential out and about.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
He's not even that, though. His legal analysis and political theory are both asinine.
If the standard of his objection to being charged with causing a disturbance was applied and his actions were indeed considered protected, the whole law pertaining to causing a disturbance would have to be considered unconstitutional (this is not even getting in to specifics; if you watch the full video and compare it to his account, it's clear he's living on another planet).
Where his politics are concerned, he rants about "libertarian" this and "anarcho" that, but he is not only in favour of conscription, but further thinks it should be contigent on whether one pays off the state, in effect. That couldn't be less libertarian. He's only "libertarian" insofar as he enjoys autistically screeching at cops and whining about other people having more power and authority than him.
The fact that he thinks that what he writes is intelligent just makes it even dumber.