Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

So, I noticed something about the Democratic Socialists of America flag.
500px-Democratic_Socialists_of_America_Logo_%28official%29.svg.png


It's ripping off the INGSOC flag from 1984
220px-Ingsoc_logo_from_1984.svg.png

(We should look into the DSA by the way, the seem like they could be a cow mine)
 
So, I noticed something about the Democratic Socialists of America flag.
500px-Democratic_Socialists_of_America_Logo_%28official%29.svg.png


It's ripping off the INGSOC flag from 1984
220px-Ingsoc_logo_from_1984.svg.png

(We should look into the DSA by the way, the seem like they could be a cow mine)

It's more likely the opposite. The rose and shaking hands thing existed before DSA, I'm pretty sure, and the 1984 movie actually did come out in 1984, I believe.
 
It's like being the little guy who hangs around with the bully to join in on the bullying.
It's like the little guy who is friends with you, but then the bully comes over to start picking on and mocking you both, and the little guy immediately joins in with the bully's digs and insults in the hope of appeasing the bully to spare himself.
 
It's like a mean girls club crossed with a caste system. The higher you are on the progressive stack, the meaner, more entitled and ungreatful you can be to the lower ones. It doesn't matter how nice the lower are, the mean girls will turn against them even if they haven't really done anything wrong.
They would shit their pants and go on a rant about all the awful shit white people have done if you said this.

They don't see people as individuals. They see them as groups. Anything the group does or did is the fault and responsibility of the entire group. The sins of POCs are shrugged off as the symptoms of oppression, colonialism, capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy, and whatever other string of crap they can make up. Certain groups are inherently oppressed. Certain groups are inherently oppressors. And the oppressed are justified completely in violent actions against their oppressors.

It's really scary that a bunch of people think this way.
 
They would shit their pants and go on a rant about all the awful shit white people have done if you said this.

They don't see people as individuals. They see them as groups. Anything the group does or did is the fault and responsibility of the entire group. The sins of POCs are shrugged off as the symptoms of oppression, colonialism, capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy, and whatever other string of crap they can make up. Certain groups are inherently oppressed. Certain groups are inherently oppressors. And the oppressed are justified completely in violent actions against their oppressors.

It's really scary that a bunch of people think this way.
I also meant POCs who happen to rank lower. Even light-skinned Hispanics have been targeted at time lately. And east Asians as well.
 
I also meant POCs who happen to rank lower. Even light-skinned Hispanics have been targeted at time lately. And east Asians as well.
You are thinking about this like a rational "white" person. To understand them you need to think exclusively in the binary. Black and white. There is no grey or similar-but different here. No nuance. No context. It either is one or the other. Oppressed or oppressor.

This is where we get the Schrodinger's Asian stuff. Are we discussing the Unequal Treaties? They are POC. Are we talking about the atrocities conducted in the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere? That's whitey.

Just hop about from race being about ethnicity and heritage to being about systems and governance. Then back again. Facts are subjective. Rules are oppressive. Systems that prize "logic" and "reason" are supremacist. So attribute virtue to POC and negative things to white man/people/systems/supremacy as you wish.

Convenient, no?
 
Back