Disaster Mass shooting at florida high school - Beware the autism

http://www.wesh.com/article/multiple-injuries-reported-in-shooting-at-florida-high-school/17887738

Multiple people have been injured in an active shooter situation at a high school in south Florida, police confirmed.

The Broward Sheriff's Office is responding to the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.

Advertisement
The Coral Springs Police Department is asking students and teachers to remain barricaded inside until police reach you.

According to WSVN, at least three people were seen surrounded by first responders and one person was seen being wheeled into an ambulance. There are reports of up to 20 injuries.
 
Bring back the breaking wheel. I think it's a fitting execution method for this incel.

CalasChapbook.jpg
this might be better, subject him to a painful surgery without anesthesia that leaves him imprisoned in his own brain. Death is too lenient for heinous cases like this IMO. I cannot fathom someone doing this kind of vile act and I am glad they caught the fucker before he killed himself.
 
This is the cause of every mass shooting in the country.

It's not the dems, not the reps, not the blues, not the reds, it's the fact that this country, by design, is a target-rich environment, which lends itself to high body counts when someone decides to go on a rampage, and there is no way to reliably or effectively change this situation without destroying a lot of personal freedoms.

I
You know maybe if America had better (and free) mental healthcare so maybe counselors and psychologists could pick up on who may be a threat but then again that isn't really going to stop the people who just blow a fuse one day and start blowing people away.
 
This is the cause of every mass shooting in the country.

It's not the dems, not the reps, not the blues, not the reds, it's the fact that this country, by design, is a target-rich environment, which lends itself to high body counts when someone decides to go on a rampage, and there is no way to reliably or effectively change this situation without destroying a lot of personal freedoms.

I

How's that different from any other Western country? They're all full of target-rich environments and those soft targets often have far less security than in the US.

You know maybe if America had better (and free) mental healthcare so maybe counselors and psychologists could pick up on who may be a threat but then again that isn't really going to stop the people who just blow a fuse one day and start blowing people away.

Post-Columbine schools and parents were absolutely paranoid about possible indications that their children might flip out and go on a rampage. Because it was initially thought that Columbine happened in response to bullying, there was a lot of scrutiny of kids who were social misfits - but there's not much evidence it prevented any shooting sprees.
 
This just touches on the whole "WHY DIDN'T SOMEONE DO SOMETHING??" problem that comes from living in a (mostly) free nation.

I'm sure the staff at this school all KNEW this kid was a nutcase, but because of the the way preventative measures against this bump up against the rights of people in this country, there was absolutely nothing anyone could do about it.

Hence the motivation for all the "TAKE AWAY THE GUNS FROM EVERYONE" Reeeeee 'ing that happens.


I think its because no matter what, people just dont want to give out those information. Why? For various reasons. Maybe they did give it out, but if its not important to you then you're not going to care nor remember it.

What were the chances that this kid would do something like this. And if so, when? He decided to do it on a day that is dedicated to love just so he could profit off the maximum amount of damage he could do.

He doesnt care. He knows hes going to rot in jail. What matters are the kids, teachers, parents who have to live with this for the rest of their lives. To have news reporters restlessly hound them for info, for "truth seekers" annoucing that the whole shooting was fake, for wanting the law to change but it wont till the next shooting happens.

In the end, what can be done? Kids just have to grow in a world where even the safest place you can be is a target.
 
If the guns shown on his insta are what he used in the shooting, the choice of a slug-firing shotgun is an odd one. Why not just use a rifle?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SwanDive
How's that different from any other Western country? They're all full of target-rich environments and those soft targets often have far less security than in the US.

Because one of those "fundamental freedoms" is personal firearm ownership, which means people who blow fuses have easy access to them. Which is why, as of late, trucks of peace seem to be their mass casualty event.

I'm not going to deny it, but I'm also not going to say taking that right from millions of people who've never abused it is going to be a fair trade.
 
It's not the dems, not the reps, not the blues, not the reds, it's the fact that this country, by design, is a target-rich environment, which lends itself to high body counts when someone decides to go on a rampage, and there is no way to reliably or effectively change this situation without destroying a lot of personal freedoms.
Exactly. People who are hell bent on killing as many people as possible don't need a gun. It's just an avenue for them to carry out their plan. The absence of which will cause them to find another equally effective method.(Driving a truck of peace into a crowd comes to mind)

The "REEEE-tards" who cry for taking away everyone's guns can't see beyond the virtue signal of "how many more kids need to die"

A similar parallel happened with child molesters in the 90's. "How many more kids have to get victimized before we do something" was behind the creation of the registry. And the registry hasn't done shit to reduce the number of kids getting diddled, while opening up the concept that it's "ok" to force citizens to participate in monitoring programs for the safety of the community.

Sure, no one gave a shit at the time 'cause who the fuck cares about some chomo's. But look what happened. Pissing in public was enough to get you put on it in the most extreme cases and all it does is cost a shit ton of money, resources and time to keep up that only really provides some laughs on the internet and a slightly more convenient way to deny someone a job or housing.
 
Exactly. People who are hell bent on killing as many people as possible don't need a gun. It's just an avenue for them to carry out their plan. The absence of which will cause them to find another equally effective method.(Driving a truck of peace into a crowd comes to mind)

The "REEEE-tards" who cry for taking away everyone's guns can't see beyond the virtue signal of "how many more kids need to die"

A similar parallel happened with child molesters in the 90's. "How many more kids have to get victimized before we do something" was behind the creation of the registry. And the registry hasn't done shit to reduce the number of kids getting diddled, while opening up the concept that it's "ok" to force citizens to participate in monitoring programs for the safety of the community.

Sure, no one gave a shit at the time 'cause who the fuck cares about some chomo's. But look what happened. Pissing in public was enough to get you put on it in the most extreme cases.

What is "equally as effective" as a gun?
 
Unpopular opinion: I think if you immediately jump on people saying "gun control now" or "gun control never" in the aftermath of a school shooting then you're pretty fucking tone deaf. While I don't agree with gun control, suggesting or pushing a method you seriously believe can prevent tragedy is a totally reasonable response. For fuck's sake, I feel like if we were in 1912 some of you guys would bitch at people for politicizing the Titanic when they demand more lifeboats on ships.
 
Back