Barring Mario, this feels like the purest distillation of Bob in one tweet.
Bob criticizing somebody else for being vapid would be funny if he didn't constantly do this. He seriously thinks he's smarter than other people for no reason other than his ego. Honestly its sad.
Boy, this sure sounds like a threat of physical violence, eh sport?
Really Bob? You're going to be an internet tough guy because you're from Boston. When your fatass can be bothered to waddle outside your own house for more than once a month, I might take your fatass more seriously, but lets be honest, you're only a threat if you fell on some small child and smothered them to death. This is how a fight with Bob would go down:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FguXuJOiEk0
But being on a successful TV show means nothing to him.
That guy actually runs a successful business and made a TV show out of it. Thats far more than you will ever do in your life.
Or you made a typo and you're trying to cover your fat ass.
OK, fuck it, lets pretend he didn't make a typo, in the early 20th century, you know, the 1900s-1910s, giant machines still needed to be run by people, there was still a necessity for Capitalism, because machines were not advanced enough to completely mechanize the labor that is even now being mechanized. Capitalism was completely viable in the 20th century (it still is now, but lets put this into perspective that even by his own retard standards, Capitalism still would be viable in the 20th century.)
So uh....can someone with a better grasp of economics explain to me how mechanization makes capitalism "obsolete" instead of being capitalism kicking into high-gear? I'd be legitimately interested if anyone can explain that. The owners of the machines are hypothetically manufacturers who aren't state owned looking for a profit and there would be trade between private entities, no?
Did you have a history class that talked about the problems mechanization had on mid to late 19th century and even early 20th century labor? The idea is that as more powerful machines and better practices became more popular, many jobs at that time died off and those workers were laid off and had to find new work. People at that time speculated on how society would change because surely these people couldn't find different jobs or be retrained, they would now have to be part of a society that moved on beyond work. This idea fell flat because people were just retrained and found new jobs that were previously unheard of because of the mechanization. Its the same thought process of people who nowadays think that its the end of Capitalism because jobs are being killed by mechanization and those people are now in need of different jobs. They think that instead of them finding new jobs the government will have to change how we as a people get paid. They don't get that with more labor other job markets will open. Its basically people who don't understand how the market evolves thinking that we have to get rid of the market altogether because they don't know where the market will head.