- Joined
- Nov 10, 2014
What the fuck, everyone?
That dragon guy sure cherry picked the arguments, but his video specifically starts by saying Zaush "has mainly been accused of being a pedophile, and holding and sharing child pornography". That's what he's talking about, and those specific accusations can be said to be unfounded, even if several other accusations are in fact true.
There was no child porn in the screenshots, that's a verifiable fact.
Also, what he did doesn't prove he's a pedophile. To the contrary, the chat logs contain evidence AGAINST that specific claim, since Zaush explicitly said he's uncomfortable about drawing pre-teens and he tried to discourage the customer from buying porn of a 10 year old character, suggesting a 12 year old instead. There's no evidence he actually PREFERS 12 year olds either, it's just that he prefers drawing them over 10 year olds. That's a huge fucking difference.
Yeah, he draws cub porn. Yeah, it seems he would've drawn cub porn comic of a 10yo getting fucked in various positions if the customer had insisted he really wanted that. Yeah, he shared photos of real children to gauge the customer's porn preferences. He also admitted he's drawn pre-teen cub porn before. These are all things he did do, and I'm not going to defend any of that.
However, he's being accused of things he didn't do, and false accusations about child porn is super fucking uncool, no matter who's being accused of it.
What's so repulsive about fact checking and correcting falsehoods, or what did I do wrong now? Seriously guys, please fucking elaborate instead of being like that.
The more I read this shit, the more I honestly think this is just a shill for Wan, or even more pathetic, Wan himself with a sockpuppet.
What about that poor woman Adam raped? Was she just being a drama queen?