- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
He's like Dobson that way. I can think of no worse insult.
Bryan Dunn / King of /pol/ (KoP) / The Armed Toast / The Exceptional Detective / BoomerPhil - Severely paranoid thin-skinned attention whore with hate/real boner for Ralph, Null, Jim, BSV, etc. "Right kind of gay" and "verified female". Legally banned from KF, 14 socks and counting, LOST A FIGHT TO THE GUNT OF ALL PEOPLE
- Thread starter Juan But Not Forgotten
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
Except Bryan is a nega-Dobson. Insted of "respekting the womyns" he screeches about justice on the internet that's non-substainable and Trump. OOF.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2018
Does he still live in the Tampa area? I'm in Florida and can check out any
When sucking dick on camera, your face won't be obscured by your hair.
Think of the advantages of such a haircut.Ahh yes, the men's undercut. Beloved darling of shitheads everywhere.
It was both the official haircut of the Hitler Youth:
And Macklemore:
Your personal tastes may determine which of the two you find more damning.
When sucking dick on camera, your face won't be obscured by your hair.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
lol so he's taking the ian approach to staying relevant since he's legally barred from harvesting from his usual source of content. please do it. i wonder if he'll use a mask and a voice changer for these videos too. 
EDIT:
so bry is gonna go after @Null it seems, who i'm sure is shaking in his boots
EDIT:
so bry is gonna go after @Null it seems, who i'm sure is shaking in his boots
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2017
Ah yes, Shmorky. Well over a year after he stopped being relevant to anyone.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2018
He's just doing filler so he can put together his Magnum opus: the history of Chris Chandler part 1475.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2017
Maybe if we hold our breath he'll do a Final Fantasy 7 House video.
Cocktimus prime
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2017
He can't honestly think this is a good idea. Why would you set yourself up for failure like this?lol so he's taking the ian approach to staying relevant since he's legally barred from harvesting from his usual source of content. please do it. i wonder if he'll use a mask and a voice changer for these videos too.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
Does he even have a fanbase large enough for this to be viable? Ian can pull it off because he's, in my opinion at least, entertaining, bothers to edit his shit, and has a following. Bryan on the other hand is the personification of the feeling you get when you add milk to your coffee only to see that the milk has expired.lol so he's taking the ian approach to staying relevant since he's legally barred from harvesting from his usual source of content. please do it. i wonder if he'll use a mask and a voice changer for these videos too.
View attachment 427245
EDIT:
so bry is gonna go after @Null it seems, who i'm sure is shaking in his boots
View attachment 427251
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
You don't need an audience to whine impotently into a microphone. Vordrak does it and the only audience he has is lolcows who hate the forum. Bryan and Vordy would probably hit it off great. Vordy needs another stooge to do illegal stuff for him, and Bryan is dumb enough to do it.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
I'd pee in her butt.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
A Null video? I have to say, Bryan Dunn is actually doing something that I'll go out of my way to see for myself.lol so he's taking the ian approach to staying relevant since he's legally barred from harvesting from his usual source of content. please do it. i wonder if he'll use a mask and a voice changer for these videos too.
View attachment 427245
EDIT:
so bry is gonna go after @Null it seems, who i'm sure is shaking in his boots
View attachment 427251
Even if it's only because it'll be a terrible video with nothing but salt and misinformation.
Waveysauce
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2017
he probably thinks he has fans because every time he makes a new twitter he ends up with a few hundred followers pretty quickly. least he said something of that nature. odd thing is a good chunk of them look like bots tho
he will for sure make about 2k sock accounts when he is getting ready to upload his next videos tho. for views and up votes
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
Given he seems to love plagiarism and mimickry, I'm assuming it's going to mostly be comprised of Vordrak's slop, /cow/ fragments, and the ED article, likely in that melange of Jim and Fred he's got going but with no level of skill or passion.
I've said more than once that Bryan is mechanically unable to stop slurping up cow manure right from the source, despite how tearfully he makes his pledge to 'get better' after the crowd laughs at him. Him doing this is only proving me right, in that the moment he thinks no one is looking or that doesn't fucking work, he clasps his fucking lips right up to that sphincter and sobs in relief.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
From the very few interactions I've had with him, I'd agree. The issue I have with him is that he won't admit that he won't change. Like if you're gonna just sit in one spot, at least be honest. Don't promise you'll move and then scoot over two inches max before scooting right back. But it's never enough to make me angry. It's just funny to watch.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2017
So @Null inquiring minds want to know: are you a pedophile supporter? Before you answer, please keep in mind that I spent 10 minutes reading your ED article, and I'm extremely susceptible to vague suggestions.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
Yeah, that's what I'm expecting.
Obviously! Where else did his 30,000 dollars go?
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
I support a nigger's right to eat lead
People who take this position about me usually bring up that I do not support the criminalization of any drawn pornography, and I've previously said that people who know they're pedophiles should seek therapy.
I'll just lay this out because I don't think I've ever summed up my thoughts in one place.
"le pedophile defender"
(1) Our federal laws on drawn pornography are perfect as they are. There is no reason to ban drawings. Fictional characters can never be an injured party.
(2) I do not believe sex toys should be banned. Bryan's entire obsession with Vidar stems from him saying that silicon sex toys molded to look underage should not be banned. I agree with Vidar for two reasons. There's no reason to ban it besides it being gross, and I'd much rather pedophiles jerk off to lolicon and fuck plastic than fuck kids.
(3) I've advocated in the past for pedophiles receiving therapy. I still believe that if you think you are attracted to prepubescents you should go to therapy and be able to safely confide in your therapist this attraction. I have no idea what the possibility of working out that problem is, even if you really want to, but there's not really a better alternative. Thought crime should not exist, and we can't arrest or kill people for feelings without grossly overextending the power of the government. There needs to be something we can do to stop child molestation, and most people should be aware by now that molesters are often molested themselves. There's a grace period between traumatic event and crime. Do something about it.
"le pedophile a-log"
(1) There is an exception to the drawing rule, which I also agree with. Characters drawn in the likeness of real children is considered child pornography even if the source material is not. This is what Shadman did and this is why I am notably an a-log of Shadman to the point where I think he should be in fucking prison. You cannot draw porn of people's children sucking dick and keep your life or freedom.
(2) Child molesters convicted with DNA or video footage should be executed by firing squad within months of conviction. You cannot fix them. I specify DNA/video because you don't want to quickly execute people who may be innocent (i.e. faulty witness testimony).
(3) People who say they are pedophiles need to be dealt with by law because no one ever lies about that shit (Nick Bate).
If I had a button on my desk that just said "kill all the pedophiles" and it had 100% accuracy and just fixed the issue by killing everyone attracted to prepubescents, I would press it. But that button doesn't exist. It will never exist. So, we have to make due with what we have, which a court system that has to balance personal freedom with resolving a problem as expediently as possible.
There you go. Tons of people disagree with me, but I have reasons to believe what I do, and they all stem from personal freedom and a reduction of government control over our thoughts and lives. I feel I have a perfectly reasoned view on this topic but for people who hate me will take whatever and pretend I just wholesale advocate letting kids get fucked, which is clearly not what I believe.
My logic is undeniable.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
For what it's worth and my whole staple with personal standing in this issue as it's happened directly to my family as well (which I'll go into some light detail about.) I do find your views to be yeah; It's a general consensus of how a lot of the general population views this issue. However, people are so adamantly blinded by virtue signalling and wanting to be the hero that it kind of blurs the line between of, "How much does this person really believe in?" And the same could be said about any political view or religious view, etc etc.
Now my issue standing goes as far as, even with hard undeniable proof (such as having photographic evidence on years worth of computers.) Why the government does so little to help those (well, less help... More lock away.) Those who are no longer having a thought crime. More those who are obvious on intent and those who, later said they did act... But unfortunately the family wishes to act holier than thou. (Even with my intervention.)
It's a sad state these days when certain vocal minorities do get blasted out because you have the majority like Bryan or otherwise clapping in the back and drowning out the voice of real issues that had happened.