- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
That doesn't stop those articles from being considered at the same level of reliability as some 30 year veteran economist, as far as Wikipedia's editor standards go.
interesting articles and shit
- Thread starter neger psykolog
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
CIA Nigger
Not a fed, just a random object on the street.
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
NVIDIA Bracing for a Cryptocurrency Demand Drop
Link: https://www.techpowerup.com/242320/nvidia-bracing-for-a-cryptocurrency-demand-drop
In what could bring cheers to PC gamers, and tears to miners, NVIDIA is reportedly wary of a possible drop in cryptocurrencies through 2018. This directly affects the company, since GPUs are used in mining various cryptocurrencies, which triggered inflation in prices of graphics cards from Q2-2017 to Q1-2018. Over the past couple of weeks, prices of popular high-end GPUs such as the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti have cooled, although not back to their original levels. NVIDIA's manufacturing division, which sub-contracts silicon fabrication to TSMC, is calculating the impact a cryptocurrency slump could have on its supply-chain, and are being conservative with their orders to the foundry. A drop in demand could leave the company with vast amounts of unsold inventories based on an old-generation architecture (Pascal, in the wake of Volta/Ampere), which could result in multi-billion-dollar inventory write-offs. According to a Digitimes report, NVIDIA has placed restrictions on its add-in card (AIC) partners on marketing cryptocurrency mining abilities of their graphics cards, and selling directly to large miners.
In addition to a slump in demand for cryptocurrencies, 2018 could see introduction of purpose-built crypto-mining ASICs that are tailored for popular cryptocurrencies. Purpose-built ASICs tend to be extremely economical for medium-thru-large scale miners, in comparison to GPUs. The third horseman is policy. While several governments around the world have developed an appreciation for blockchain technology for its resilience to tampering, fraud, and data-theft (which could be implemented in government records, bank records); governments are, understandably, anti-cryptocurrency, as it undermines sovereign legal tender issued by central banks. Several governments through 2017-18 have announced measures to crack down on cryptocurrency mining and use as tender. This has led to a further drop in public interest in cryptocurrencies, as large ICO investors are weary of losing money in a highly volatile market. Close to half the ICOs have failed.
Original Source: https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20180313PD204.html
Link: https://www.techpowerup.com/242320/nvidia-bracing-for-a-cryptocurrency-demand-drop
In what could bring cheers to PC gamers, and tears to miners, NVIDIA is reportedly wary of a possible drop in cryptocurrencies through 2018. This directly affects the company, since GPUs are used in mining various cryptocurrencies, which triggered inflation in prices of graphics cards from Q2-2017 to Q1-2018. Over the past couple of weeks, prices of popular high-end GPUs such as the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti have cooled, although not back to their original levels. NVIDIA's manufacturing division, which sub-contracts silicon fabrication to TSMC, is calculating the impact a cryptocurrency slump could have on its supply-chain, and are being conservative with their orders to the foundry. A drop in demand could leave the company with vast amounts of unsold inventories based on an old-generation architecture (Pascal, in the wake of Volta/Ampere), which could result in multi-billion-dollar inventory write-offs. According to a Digitimes report, NVIDIA has placed restrictions on its add-in card (AIC) partners on marketing cryptocurrency mining abilities of their graphics cards, and selling directly to large miners.
In addition to a slump in demand for cryptocurrencies, 2018 could see introduction of purpose-built crypto-mining ASICs that are tailored for popular cryptocurrencies. Purpose-built ASICs tend to be extremely economical for medium-thru-large scale miners, in comparison to GPUs. The third horseman is policy. While several governments around the world have developed an appreciation for blockchain technology for its resilience to tampering, fraud, and data-theft (which could be implemented in government records, bank records); governments are, understandably, anti-cryptocurrency, as it undermines sovereign legal tender issued by central banks. Several governments through 2017-18 have announced measures to crack down on cryptocurrency mining and use as tender. This has led to a further drop in public interest in cryptocurrencies, as large ICO investors are weary of losing money in a highly volatile market. Close to half the ICOs have failed.
Original Source: https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20180313PD204.html
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
Florida Man uses government credit card to buy GPUs.
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/News/2018/March/Department-of-Citrus-manager-arrested-on-grand-the
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/News/2018/March/Department-of-Citrus-manager-arrested-on-grand-the
blah
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2017
Dammit, I was just posting that. Here's a link to the original report at least: https://fc18.ifca.ai/preproceedings/6.pdf
Section 3.2 is a fun read (describes the kinds of malicious shit that could be hidden in the blockchain), and section 4.3 describes what they actually found when they looked.
Section 3.2 is a fun read (describes the kinds of malicious shit that could be hidden in the blockchain), and section 4.3 describes what they actually found when they looked.
The Demon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2017
https://news.bitcoin.com/no-isnt-child-porn-bitcoin-blockchain/
edit:
No, There Isn’t Child Porn on the Bitcoin Blockchain
Anyone swiping through the tech news on their tablet this week may have been startled by an unsavory story. Child pornography (CP) is permanently encoded in the bitcoin blockchain accoriding to mainstream media reports, making anyone who downloads the blockchain guilty of accessing CP. Not only is this old news, but it’s fake news. Understanding why calls for taking a quick dip into bitcoin’s code.
Also read: Bitcoin Cash Ecosystem Sees a Tidal Wave of Merchant Acceptance
Bitcoin’s Boogeyman Returns
No one can really recall what bitcoin was branded as first: a tool of terrorists, drug dealers, or child pornographers. All that can be said for certain is all three canards have been trotted out regularly over the years. Only last week in the U.S. Senate, Representative Brad Sherman expressed hope that a cryptocurrency panel would reconvene immediately after there had been a terrorist attack funded by crypto. But that was last week; this week it’s all about pornography of the worst kind. CP is the topic du jour thanks to a new research paper. Its abstract explains:
Blockchains…irrevocably record arbitrary data, ranging from short messages to pictures. This does not come without risk for users as each participant has to locally replicate the complete blockchain, particularly including potentially harmful content…Our analysis shows that certain content, e.g., illegal pornography, can render the mere possession of a blockchain illegal…our analysis reveals more than 1600 files on the blockchain, over 99% of which are texts or images. Among these files there is clearly objectionable content such as links to child pornography, which is distributed to all Bitcoin participants.
This all sounds pretty damning, and given some of the alarmist headlines the paper has generated, you would have thought the FBI van was speeding its way to every address known to operate a full bitcoin node. But that’s not quite how the real story goes.
The Daily Dot cranks up the FUD.
Old News Is Old
The CP on the blockchain story isn’t news and it isn’t new either. In fact, it was first dragged up in 2013, and has been revived, six years on, purely because a new paper has given the claims an air of legitimacy. News outlets were quick to jump on the story again, which was then widely shared by attention trolls such as Brianna Wu. The false hypothesis comes from the fact that it’s possible to encode information in the blockchain. That was how Satoshi famously hid his message in the genesis block: “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”. Anyone inspecting the blockchain won’t find those words however. Instead they’ll find the following hash: 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26. That is the block’s coinbase parameter (nothing to do with Coinbase the company), written in hex.
Media publications have had a field day with the CP non-story.
A research paper published in July 2017 titled Data Insertion in Bitcoin’s Blockchain explores this topic in more detail and explains how the coinbase data “is arbitrary and can be up to 100 bytes in size”. Only miners have the ability to insert data in this manner, and it’s typically used to signal mining support for proposed protocol changes. There are five other ways in which data can be encoded on the bitcoin blockchain, and it is the OP_RETURN option that is at the center of the child pornography story. The 2017 research paper explains that “this method is appropriate for inserting small amounts of data (or transaction metadata), but it is not suitable for large quantities of data.”
The Guardian gets in on the act
80 bytes is all that OP_RETURN can store, and what’s more that information is subject to deletion. That’s because bitcoin nodes are capable of pruning “provably unspendable” UTXOs for efficiency, which include OP_RETURN data. Anyone wishing to use the bitcoin blockchain to seek out child pornography would need to perform the following convoluted process:
Don’t Believe the Headlines
Asserting that there is child pornography on the blockchain would be like strolling through the U.S. Capitol Building, dropping a scrap of paper containing a deep web address, and then claiming that the American government is storing obscene content. As respected bitcoin commenter Nic Carter wrote: “Any journalist writing about arbitrary content injection into the Bitcoin blockchain should be extremely careful to detail to what extent that content exists, is extractable, viewable, etc. A text string which is a URL link to a [website displaying a thing] is not [the thing itself]. That is an extremely bad interpretation. Do not conflate the two. If you are willing to claim that “the blockchain contains X” you should be able to prove that you can extract X.”
Steganography and blockchain data insertion are fascinating topics that deserve scrutiny and further study. But to assert that the blockchain contains child pornography is misleading to the point of falsehood. It’s possible to encode a hidden link inside any database, including Facebook, Twitter, and Wikipedia. The act of doing so proves nothing other than the fascination some people have for concealing messages in messages – and that’s been happening since 1499.
Anyone swiping through the tech news on their tablet this week may have been startled by an unsavory story. Child pornography (CP) is permanently encoded in the bitcoin blockchain accoriding to mainstream media reports, making anyone who downloads the blockchain guilty of accessing CP. Not only is this old news, but it’s fake news. Understanding why calls for taking a quick dip into bitcoin’s code.
Also read: Bitcoin Cash Ecosystem Sees a Tidal Wave of Merchant Acceptance
Bitcoin’s Boogeyman Returns
No one can really recall what bitcoin was branded as first: a tool of terrorists, drug dealers, or child pornographers. All that can be said for certain is all three canards have been trotted out regularly over the years. Only last week in the U.S. Senate, Representative Brad Sherman expressed hope that a cryptocurrency panel would reconvene immediately after there had been a terrorist attack funded by crypto. But that was last week; this week it’s all about pornography of the worst kind. CP is the topic du jour thanks to a new research paper. Its abstract explains:
Blockchains…irrevocably record arbitrary data, ranging from short messages to pictures. This does not come without risk for users as each participant has to locally replicate the complete blockchain, particularly including potentially harmful content…Our analysis shows that certain content, e.g., illegal pornography, can render the mere possession of a blockchain illegal…our analysis reveals more than 1600 files on the blockchain, over 99% of which are texts or images. Among these files there is clearly objectionable content such as links to child pornography, which is distributed to all Bitcoin participants.
This all sounds pretty damning, and given some of the alarmist headlines the paper has generated, you would have thought the FBI van was speeding its way to every address known to operate a full bitcoin node. But that’s not quite how the real story goes.
The Daily Dot cranks up the FUD.
Old News Is Old
The CP on the blockchain story isn’t news and it isn’t new either. In fact, it was first dragged up in 2013, and has been revived, six years on, purely because a new paper has given the claims an air of legitimacy. News outlets were quick to jump on the story again, which was then widely shared by attention trolls such as Brianna Wu. The false hypothesis comes from the fact that it’s possible to encode information in the blockchain. That was how Satoshi famously hid his message in the genesis block: “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”. Anyone inspecting the blockchain won’t find those words however. Instead they’ll find the following hash: 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26. That is the block’s coinbase parameter (nothing to do with Coinbase the company), written in hex.
Media publications have had a field day with the CP non-story.
A research paper published in July 2017 titled Data Insertion in Bitcoin’s Blockchain explores this topic in more detail and explains how the coinbase data “is arbitrary and can be up to 100 bytes in size”. Only miners have the ability to insert data in this manner, and it’s typically used to signal mining support for proposed protocol changes. There are five other ways in which data can be encoded on the bitcoin blockchain, and it is the OP_RETURN option that is at the center of the child pornography story. The 2017 research paper explains that “this method is appropriate for inserting small amounts of data (or transaction metadata), but it is not suitable for large quantities of data.”
The Guardian gets in on the act
80 bytes is all that OP_RETURN can store, and what’s more that information is subject to deletion. That’s because bitcoin nodes are capable of pruning “provably unspendable” UTXOs for efficiency, which include OP_RETURN data. Anyone wishing to use the bitcoin blockchain to seek out child pornography would need to perform the following convoluted process:
- Download the entire bitcoin blockchain and sift through 251 million transactions to find the 1.4% that contain some kind of arbitrary data encoded in them.
- Ensure that the version of the blockchain you were using had been subject to no pruning that might have removed OP_RETURN data.
- Extract any web links that might be concealed in the data using some sort of steganography.
- Type the links into your browser until you eventually found a website that was still accessible.
Don’t Believe the Headlines
Steganography and blockchain data insertion are fascinating topics that deserve scrutiny and further study. But to assert that the blockchain contains child pornography is misleading to the point of falsehood. It’s possible to encode a hidden link inside any database, including Facebook, Twitter, and Wikipedia. The act of doing so proves nothing other than the fascination some people have for concealing messages in messages – and that’s been happening since 1499.
blah
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
TL;DR: Yes, there is child porn but the author does not approve of the definition just because it is not hosted directly on the chain.
Remind me to upload an actual picture in chunks though, so that articles like this lolmonster does not get written and that the smug cat pictures can be used for something more suitable.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
crypto news headlines all become a mindless blur
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
https://hashnode.com/post/how-to-bu...-in-next-20-minutes-cjbcpwzec01c93awtbij90uzn
@14⚡⚡ weev ⚡⚡88 @neger psykolog @CrunkLord420
Ok children, weev wants me to launch a kf eth token using part of my fabulous company as stake. It seems trivial.
What do you think?
@14⚡⚡ weev ⚡⚡88 @neger psykolog @CrunkLord420
Ok children, weev wants me to launch a kf eth token using part of my fabulous company as stake. It seems trivial.
What do you think?
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
No. 100% no.
If you're going to do it, I'd figure out a way to attach posting, traffic or hosting onto another cryptocurrency and hype that up if it ever happens. It isn't viable right now, but it will be soon.
Problems with tokens:
- You're never going to get listed anywhere without paying.
- You're never going to get listed anywhere worth getting listed on.
- You're never going to be able to stand out from all the other tokens.
- Something like po.et might be better use for the site. Its a token/project surrounding digital licensing of writing. Already has quite a few integrations: https://www.po.et/integrations
- Alternatively, you could look at something like cryptokitties and tying that as an in-site currency
- Also something to do with video sharing/file sharing as a currency
Not sure exactly "how" you'd integrate any of these as there are almost no websites that have actually integrated their own currencies. but creating your own token isn't what I'd suggest. A definite no, unless you're doing it sarcastically. I'd consider any 'value' you have in getting people interesting in something and that by launching an ERC20 token you'd be wasting that value. You can't regain any value you have once you already have a token.
I think an idea that I'd have for integrating currencies would be this:
- Pick something that is trivial to earn small amounts on (like JoyStream or some other file sharing crypto)
- Allow people to deposit amounts on their Kiwifarms wallet
- Allow people to tip/send money to each other and add a small fee (1-5%) for each send/receive/deposit/withdrawal
- That way you allow people to use someone else's value and you gain a small percentage for transactions. If the crypto you base on it goes to shit, you have no real attachment to it and you can just move to a different project/alternative.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
Don't get sent to prison.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-131
https://www.yahoo.com/news/warning-celebrity-cryptocurrency-endorsers-may-143025940.html
https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-sec-official-confirms-dozens-of-cryptocurrency-probes
Also I was recently involved with a listing of a PoW (monero-clone) coin, including operating a pool. The people who paid to get the coin listed basically got dumped on hard (by me and other miners). So the whole process of getting listed is itself a financial gamble.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-131
https://www.yahoo.com/news/warning-celebrity-cryptocurrency-endorsers-may-143025940.html
https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-sec-official-confirms-dozens-of-cryptocurrency-probes
Also I was recently involved with a listing of a PoW (monero-clone) coin, including operating a pool. The people who paid to get the coin listed basically got dumped on hard (by me and other miners). So the whole process of getting listed is itself a financial gamble.
Last edited:
de_DEVIL_tails
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2018
Can your country really lay charges on activity deemed illegal retroactivly? Seems like something unconstitutional for a developed country to do
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
It's a matter of legal interpretation that has yet to be fully determined. The overall feeling is that it's a cat and mouse game with banks and government. When the SEC says something like this people take note because it means if start self-regulation doesn't happen they're going to come in and fuck everyone's shit up. The People's Bank of China has a different MO where they will just come in and fuck everyone's shit up first, and then get the changes they want.
American citizens live under a bizarre type of financial imperialism that few other countries require. They have to pay federal taxes until they actually renounce their citizenship regardless of where they live and for how long. Former "havens" like the Swiss banks are turning away US nationals because they can't actually protect them from the long arm of the IRS. Plenty of exchanges ban US nationals, and definitely do not allow them to margin trade.
It's pretty funny to see the USA listed as a banned country along with Syria, North Korea and Iran when registering to a crypto service. I've known people who've had their exchange account locked down because they accidentally connected from a US IP address when using their VPN. Or vice-versa where US nationals forget to use their VPN.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
Crypto Visa card company Monaco just spent millions to buy Crypto.com
Jon Russell@jonrussell / 10 hours ago
Highly-prized domain name Crypto.com has been sold!
Registered in 1993 by Matt Blaze, a professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania who sits on the board of directors of the Tor Project, the domain has attracted a vast amount of interest as you’d expect given the explosion of crypto in recent years. However, Blaze has turned down all offers.
In January, Blaze repeated that the domain was “not for sale” and that people shouldn’t both to contact him — as The Verge noted — however fast forward to July and he has parted with it after Monaco, a crypto project best-known for developing a crypto debit card, bought the domain in an undisclosed deal.
Experts told The Verge that Crypto.com could have attracted as much as $10 million, however Monaco CEO Kris Marszalek declined to go into the specifics.
“If it was only about money he’d have sold it a long time ago,” he told TechCrunch in an interview.
Hong Kong-based Monaco’s ICO finished in June 2017 with the company raising what was then worth $25 million in crypto. Fast forward today and Marszalek said the firm has close to $200 million on its balance sheet thanks to a surge in the valuation of cryptocurrencies like Ether, but he suggested that, more than money, the sale was about finding the right home for the domain.
“This is a very powerful identity that we are taking on. It’s representative of the entire category so it comes with a huge responsibility on us to carry the torch. We don’t take it lightly and this is one of the things that I think we conveyed successfully, that, as a company, we do have a higher purpose,” he said.
“Fundamentally, blockchain and crypto will enable [the next generation] to control their money, to control their data and to control their identity, these are the three fundamental things that weave the fabric of society. For us this is the purpose, we want to acceleration the world’s adoption of cryptocurrency,” he added.
The splashy purchase of the domain is part of a rebrand for Monaco that will see the parent company become Crypto.com and its Monaco services — which the upcoming Visa card, peer-to-peer transfer and a wallet app — become MCO, the same name as the company’s cryptocurrency.
The Monaco card itself just entered testing for a small group of users, primarily the MCO team, and Marszalek said it will be available for all customers in Singapore and Europe this summer, with a rollout for those in the U.S. likely in Q4. That’s covering a backlog of over 70,000 waiting users, but the company has sweetened the appeal of a card for new people by adding a number of perks, most notably cashback on transactions and a concierge, which vary based on the level.
At around $7 per MCO token, the commitment for a card isn’t cheap. The top of the range ‘Obsidian Black,’ which has the highest rate of cashback and perks, requires a customer to hold around $350,000 in MCO tokens. However, there’s a selection to cater to different budgets.
MCO is well-known for its card project, which has been two years in the making and it captured the attention of early crypto enthusiasts, but Marszalek said the company is cooking up other services in a bid to offer a more rounded product line. (That also explains the rebrand.) Among things to expect, he said MCO is opening to introduce lending that uses crypto as collateral, a low-rate credit service, and a robo trading investment feature.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/05/crypto-com-mco/?utm_source=tctwreshare&sr_share=twitter
Note: The author owns a small amount of cryptocurrency. Enough to gain an understanding, not enough to change a life.
Jon Russell@jonrussell / 10 hours ago
Highly-prized domain name Crypto.com has been sold!
Registered in 1993 by Matt Blaze, a professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania who sits on the board of directors of the Tor Project, the domain has attracted a vast amount of interest as you’d expect given the explosion of crypto in recent years. However, Blaze has turned down all offers.
In January, Blaze repeated that the domain was “not for sale” and that people shouldn’t both to contact him — as The Verge noted — however fast forward to July and he has parted with it after Monaco, a crypto project best-known for developing a crypto debit card, bought the domain in an undisclosed deal.
Experts told The Verge that Crypto.com could have attracted as much as $10 million, however Monaco CEO Kris Marszalek declined to go into the specifics.
“If it was only about money he’d have sold it a long time ago,” he told TechCrunch in an interview.
Hong Kong-based Monaco’s ICO finished in June 2017 with the company raising what was then worth $25 million in crypto. Fast forward today and Marszalek said the firm has close to $200 million on its balance sheet thanks to a surge in the valuation of cryptocurrencies like Ether, but he suggested that, more than money, the sale was about finding the right home for the domain.
“This is a very powerful identity that we are taking on. It’s representative of the entire category so it comes with a huge responsibility on us to carry the torch. We don’t take it lightly and this is one of the things that I think we conveyed successfully, that, as a company, we do have a higher purpose,” he said.
“Fundamentally, blockchain and crypto will enable [the next generation] to control their money, to control their data and to control their identity, these are the three fundamental things that weave the fabric of society. For us this is the purpose, we want to acceleration the world’s adoption of cryptocurrency,” he added.
The splashy purchase of the domain is part of a rebrand for Monaco that will see the parent company become Crypto.com and its Monaco services — which the upcoming Visa card, peer-to-peer transfer and a wallet app — become MCO, the same name as the company’s cryptocurrency.
The Monaco card itself just entered testing for a small group of users, primarily the MCO team, and Marszalek said it will be available for all customers in Singapore and Europe this summer, with a rollout for those in the U.S. likely in Q4. That’s covering a backlog of over 70,000 waiting users, but the company has sweetened the appeal of a card for new people by adding a number of perks, most notably cashback on transactions and a concierge, which vary based on the level.
At around $7 per MCO token, the commitment for a card isn’t cheap. The top of the range ‘Obsidian Black,’ which has the highest rate of cashback and perks, requires a customer to hold around $350,000 in MCO tokens. However, there’s a selection to cater to different budgets.
MCO is well-known for its card project, which has been two years in the making and it captured the attention of early crypto enthusiasts, but Marszalek said the company is cooking up other services in a bid to offer a more rounded product line. (That also explains the rebrand.) Among things to expect, he said MCO is opening to introduce lending that uses crypto as collateral, a low-rate credit service, and a robo trading investment feature.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/05/crypto-com-mco/?utm_source=tctwreshare&sr_share=twitter
Note: The author owns a small amount of cryptocurrency. Enough to gain an understanding, not enough to change a life.
ColtWalker1847
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2017
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
Bitcoin Predicted To Be The Nail In The Coffin Of Climate Change
Bitcoin alone could push global temperatures over the 2ºC catastrophic threshold by 2034 if the cryptocurrency gets adopted at the same pace as other broadly used technologies, says a new report in the journal Nature Climate Change.You’re forgiven if you aren’t familiar with a digital currency that could single-handedly devastate the planet.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrea...in-the-coffin-of-climate-change/#3a33ae4f745e
Bitcoin alone could push global temperatures over the 2ºC catastrophic threshold by 2034 if the cryptocurrency gets adopted at the same pace as other broadly used technologies, says a new report in the journal Nature Climate Change.You’re forgiven if you aren’t familiar with a digital currency that could single-handedly devastate the planet.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrea...in-the-coffin-of-climate-change/#3a33ae4f745e
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
Brianna Wu predicted this