- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
One of the funnier things about Brad trying to act all scientific with his crackpot nonsense is when he tries to cite sources.
If he wants something to be true, he'll quote mine forever and stoop to any low imaginable to cling to his biased worldview.
He'll happily cite a blog on shitty poetry to get someone to say Trump Tower has a height of such-and-such or that some random, meaningless tidbit of information matches his numbers fetish.
It's pretty clear that he, at no point, even considers to perform source criticism. He'll cite a source and someone else might cite another but in his mind, they are absolutely equal in quality, only his is the more correct one cause it satisfies his schizoid delusions.
If he wants something to be true, he'll quote mine forever and stoop to any low imaginable to cling to his biased worldview.
He'll happily cite a blog on shitty poetry to get someone to say Trump Tower has a height of such-and-such or that some random, meaningless tidbit of information matches his numbers fetish.
It's pretty clear that he, at no point, even considers to perform source criticism. He'll cite a source and someone else might cite another but in his mind, they are absolutely equal in quality, only his is the more correct one cause it satisfies his schizoid delusions.