Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Notice he doesn't actually refute that video (which is indeed interesting) in any meaningful way. He just emotes and sneers. Typical.
A good critic can explain why they like a film to the point where even if you don't agree, you can at least see where they're coming from.

But Bob's about as far from being a good critic as he is from being a healthy weight.
 
That's how you know that is really got to him. It is a Bob tell if he sneers at you or leaves some passive-aggressive remark towards you, how childish.

And yet he left a link to the video, ensuring at least a few more eyeballs will land on it. Or is this low-key brigading?

EDIT: Oh my. At least he won't be able to pull the "Who are you again?" nonsense.

wisecrack.PNG
 
"Trump Country" did pulled itself up in the last election, before the disbelieving eyes of Dems. Hence their mah Russians rant.

And Bobby believes that if you deprive Middle America of resources they'll more likely vote for you.
 
This is the same guy who could not get over BvS. Of course with the reception of IW, Bob will rub in the face of WB that Disney pulled off "dark and gritty" better than the DCEU.
Speaking of which, he spent four hours ranting about how horrible it was, did he ever propose ways to improve it?
 
A good critic can explain why they like a film to the point where even if you don't agree, you can at least see where they're coming from.

But Bob's about as far from being a good critic as he is from being a healthy weight.

Roger Ebert was so good at making his point that a confused reader wrote in saying a negative review of his made him want to go see the movie, while a positive review made him never want to watch that movie. Ebert then explained that his job wasn't to rate movies, not really, it was to tell you about the movie and let you decide if it's worth your time.

Bob is about as far from that ideal as i am from attractive single women. Which is lightyears of distance.
 
Speaking of which, he spent four hours ranting about how horrible it was, did he ever propose ways to improve it?

In his bvs video series, Bob puts out some ideas here and there but ultimately he believes BvS doesn't work conceptually because the set up was so contrived. Bob posits that the movie should've been reworked into Man of Steel 2 featuring batman, Where supes fights against a High-tec Lex Luthor instead. His reasoning so that at the very least character motives made actual sense, if were keeping the same plot.
 
Last edited:
Roger Ebert was so good at making his point that a confused reader wrote in saying a negative review of his made him want to go see the movie, while a positive review made him never want to watch that movie. Ebert then explained that his job wasn't to rate movies, not really, it was to tell you about the movie and let you decide if it's worth your time.

Bob is about as far from that ideal as i am from attractive single women. Which is lightyears of distance.
Outside of Slasher Films Ebert would also fairly judge a film for what it was meaning if a kids movie he would judge by the standards of other kids films and not all cinema. Bob can't fairly judge anything because he brings all his personal baggage to his reviews also anyone who calls Roland Emmerich a great director should lose their right to review films.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo
Speaking of which, he spent four hours ranting about how horrible it was, did he ever propose ways to improve it?
The most he did was some twitter posts where he'd throw out ideas like "Introduce Dick Grayson as Robin!" while completely missing the plot point of Bruce being out of it during the movie due to Dick leaving and Jason dying.

A movie he claimed to watch over 5 times and he can't keep up with the plot.
 
His video series is longer than the actual movie. It is objectively worse than the bad movie based on that alone.
 
M O O N W H E A T

Bob has very unrealistic expectations of space travel and odd presumptions about where our tech needs to go. While space travel is certainly a long term issue butwe really don't have the tech to be out their in any meaningful way for resoarces for at least 50 years on. As for Benzos and frankly, bob I can think of a way more valid investment than moonwheat

1673225-inline-750-homeless3.jpg
 
Heh, speaking of not getting over things...
khvoters-jpg.439407
Careful Bob, you're showing your genocidal urges again...

Realistically, even if the Dems pull out a win in 2020, aren't they currently filing bankruptcy? Maybe I'm remembering wrong but if that's true how exactly will they pull off Bob's wet dream of "dismantling" the American right?
 
Careful Bob, you're showing your genocidal urges again...

Realistically, even if the Dems pull out a win in 2020, aren't they currently filing bankruptcy? Maybe I'm remembering wrong but if that's true how exactly will they pull off Bob's wet dream of "dismantling" the American right?
They can't even pull off a good run for office right now and are basically floating on anti trump voters, they are far to broke to actually do anything honestly. But Bob doesn't care about the DNC itself really, once the DNC falls apart he'll just move on to the most far left urbanite party there is and pretend the DNC never existed after a weeks.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: GrayWater and Flexo
I love the fact blob has such a childlike view on science, he thinks throwing stupid amounts of money at research makes it go faster like real life is some sort of stupid video game.
Bob's the type who if he was born a few centuries earlier would be going on about magic and dragons instead of "science". As much as people would think otherwise, that kind of view isn't uncommon. He's scientifically illiterate.
 
Bob's the type who if he was born a few centuries earlier would be going on about magic and dragons instead of "science". As much as people would think otherwise, that kind of view isn't uncommon. He's scientifically illiterate.
I would say he's just near totally illiterate, it's like he can read but nothing he reads registers as necessary information.

I'm pretty sure the man could 'read' Dune then come away saying the book was about why we should kill free people and build bigger population centers and house Harkonnon did nothing wrong. He just interprets everything into Bob speak and Bob logic all the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back