Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whizzing on Dracula.
View attachment 438623 View attachment 438624

We cover pedophiles and Neo-Nazis. Bob's a drop in the ocean by comparison.
What is he even talking about? The 1992 film had more space for side character dialogue than any of the earlier films, in part because it's over two and a half hours long. Has he ever mentioned watching any of the earlier ones?:thinking:

And a good vampire story has the vampire about even matched with the humans, that's the fun part. You would think he would notice the superhero parallels. The vampire gets super powers, but has weaknesses to be exploited.
 

That was my poor attempt at making a joke about Bob spending the rest of his life alone.

Seriously though, what is with that damn sped up voice? If anything it just makes his points harder to understand as more often than not his points turns into word mush.

Is he trying to hide just how slow he actually talks so he doesn't come across as dim-witted?
 
Yet wanting to disenfranchise voters who disagree with you isn't?
Orwell.JPG


And his shitty ideas for Robin Hood movies.
Robbin.JPG
Robbin0.JPG
 
Yet wanting to disenfranchise voters who disagree with you isn't?
orwell-jpg.440817

I find it unlikely that Bob has even read any of Orwell's work and even knows the meaning of the the term aside from incredibly broad strokes that suit his opinions. The "right" to object does not preclude others' right to free speech via targeted harassment, which these protests effectively are. Bob would be whining about, "muh freeze peach" if a bunch of his detractors picketed one of his panels because of his eugenicist views, granted, I wouldn't want that to happen to him. That is the wonderful thing about letting him have his free speech: it reveals how much a ignorant, hateful, and all-round disgusting piece of human garbage he is. Why would I want to take that away from him?
 
Last edited:
Bob describing the protection of others’ speech as “orwellian” is like the perfect microcosm of Bob. It’s hypocritical, and shows his clear lack of understanding of the word’s meaning. That’s one for the next collage of shitty Bob quotes.
 
Yet wanting to disenfranchise voters who disagree with you isn't?
View attachment 440817
You fucking dipshit Bob. IT'S YOUR SIDE THAT'S BANNING THE RIGHT TO OBJECT!

Holy shit how can a man be this fucking dense?!?! He has openly mocked the concept of free speech for years! Don't you act like you are some champion of free speech. They aren't even banning the right to complain it's just stopping people from chimping out.

I know you are not supposed to get angry at cows but Bob's sheer fucking stupidity makes me rage.
 
You fucking dipshit Bob. IT'S YOUR SIDE THAT'S BANNING THE RIGHT TO OBJECT!

Holy shit how can a man be this fucking dense?!‽ He has openly mocked the concept of free speech for years! Don't you act like you are some champion of free speech. They aren't even banning the right to complain it's just stopping people from chimping out.

I know you are not supposed to get angry at cows but Bob's sheer fucking stupidity makes me rage.
Lol calm down.
 
New video:

I gave @Godzilla@1989 shit for posting Bob's vids without bringing any discussion to the thread, and I will do the same to you, did you even watch the video before you linked it to here? The vid is 17 minutes and this was posted pretty quickly after bob posted it on youtube.

Anyways, Behold the final vid of this uncessesary trilogy!
Allow me to catch y'all up to speed

part 1: Apu is racist to real indians.
part 2: because the writers are white.
Now for part 3

TL;DW:

Bob begins saying his video had to be reworked due to Hank Azaria adressing his guilt and grief over Apu with his Steven Colbert interview, Hank stating he's willing to step down as Apu for a more "appropriate" voice actor. Bob likes this idea but worries about WHO would replace legendary Hank Azaria. Bob claims he sincerely does not know if removing the stereotypes would make Apu the same chracter.

Bob then sidetracks into race and voice acting, how minstrel shows are bad but cartoons are a bit more iffy, giving more leeway since cartoons are exaggarations. Bob though considers Apu as an exception, believing that the offensive Indian stereotype is Apu's only gag. He cites the Boondocks (bob's aware the episode where the use samuel jackson to voice a white guy) as an example of good it would be to have voice actors that ethnically match their animated characters.

Bob claims that The Simpsons has been known not only funny but culturally positive for television for the last 30 years, while having most controvsery ending in the show's favor. Bob explains this positive reinforcement has created an ego of sorts for the showrunners, making them believe they can do no wrong. This is why the writers are defensive towards the problem with Apu. He believe we should listen to Hank Azaria on this and try to get the opinion on real Indians to help write a better apu.

TL;DR:
Bob posits two solutions to the whole conundrum, either that the showrunners Listen to critics and change Apu to fit with the times, or a more extreme measure is remove him and other stereotypes from the show altogether, sort of archiving them as funny for their time period instead of trying to force characters into molds they cannot fit.

Extra fun fact: In the Vid everyone gets a good close up on his fat face and at least I can say for certain Bob is going bald.

Capture.jpg


Honestly this trilogy could've been compressed into a single 5 minute at best video, but that's just wishful thinking on my part considering moviebob here.
 
I gave @Godzilla@1989 shit for posting Bob's vids without bringing any discussion to the thread, and I will do the same to you, did you even watch the video before you linked it to here? The vid is 17 minutes and this was posted pretty quickly after bob posted it on youtube.

Anyways, Behold the final vid of this uncessesary trilogy!
Allow me to catch y'all up to speed

part 1: Apu is racist to real indians.
part 2: because the writers are white.
Now for part 3

TL;DW:

Bob begins saying his video had to be reworked due to Hank Azaria adressing his guilt and grief over Apu with his Steven Colbert interview, Hank stating he's willing to step down as Apu for a more "appropriate" voice actor. Bob likes this idea but worries about WHO would replace legendary Hank Azaria. Bob claims he sincerely does not know if removing the stereotypes would make Apu the same chracter.

Bob then sidetracks into race and voice acting, how minstrel shows are bad but cartoons are a bit more iffy, giving more leeway since cartoons are exaggarations. Bob though considers Apu as an exception, believing that the offensive Indian stereotype is Apu's only gag. He cites the Boondocks (bob's aware the episode where the use samuel jackson to voice a white guy) as an example of good it would be to have voice actors that ethnically match their animated characters.

Bob claims that The Simpsons has been known not only funny but culturally positive for television for the last 30 years, while having most controvsery ending in the show's favor. Bob explains this positive reinforcement has created an ego of sorts for the showrunners, making them believe they can do no wrong. This is why the writers are defensive towards the problem with Apu. He believe we should listen to Hank Azaria on this and try to get the opinion on real Indians to help write a better apu.

TL;DR:
Bob posits two solutions to the whole conundrum, either that the showrunners Listen to critics and change Apu to fit with the times, or a more extreme measure is remove him and other stereotypes from the show altogether, sort of archiving them as funny for their time period instead of trying to force characters into molds they cannot fit.

Extra fun fact: In the Vid everyone gets a good close up on his fat face and at least I can say for certain Bob is going bald.

View attachment 440891

Honestly this trilogy could've been compressed into a single 5 minute at best video, but that's just wishful thinking on my part considering moviebob here.
That is grotesque. Did Bob start getting jaundice or is that just his shitty lighting?
 
Maybe Bob was actually a bad Simpsons character this whole time. He’s kind of like a poor man’s Comic Book Guy, but far less likeable

or

Maybe Bob is trying to turn his skin yellow like a Simpsons character and replace Apu himself

EDIT: Trying to edit on mobile sucks
 
Last edited:
Maybe Bob is trying to turn his skin yellow like a Simpsons character and replace Apu himself

I've been seriously toying with the notion of making Bob a character in a novel -- an independent book store owner, maybe, who bans Trump supporters and other assorted wasteland ghouls from his premises. But who would ever believe it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back