Chris was never sexually molested though, in fact, that poor hooker has more claims to sex abuse than ol' what's his face.
What Idea Guy did involved sexual elements and it was seriously abusive. He has committed felonies across state lines.
Why are you also comparing Chris to a female sex abuse victim when he still thinks, acts, and looks like a man?
I wasn't comparing Chris to a female sex abuse victim, just a sex abuse victim in general.
This is always what happens, as soon as Chris starts to show some signs of coming out or doing something stupid, you say, "he's not bi-curious" or "he won't act like a tard in public", and when he finally comes out or does something stupid, it turns into "it was coercion" or "he wouldn't have been banned unless the weens had something to do with it", despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
It was coercion. Someone managed to scam Chris out of money or property. It's a felony for the nigerian prince to do it to grandma, but at least the nigerian prince isn't in the US. Unfortunately for Idea Guy, he's in the United States, within reach of the long arm of the law.
In regards to Chris getting banned from the gym: actually no, I don't claim Chris couldn't get himself banned. He gets himself banned from places all the time. And what you say about "overwhelming evidence to the contrary", no, there is zero publicly available evidence that suggests he was banned for valid reasons. Or banned for invalid reasons. There is no public information either way.
Now, the reason I think Chris was unfairly banned was because I know specific details. I believe that weens called and said Chris was going to harm himself or others. People who find this theory implausible ("they can't ban him for anonymous complaints!") must be completely unfamiliar with the retail world in the United States. If you're telling me, that if a business manager today, in *current year*, with all the school shootings and whackos with guns, would get several calls with an accurate description about the same weird fucker with a baseball bat, that they'd spend even five minutes thinking about the decision to ban, you're a grade A dumb dumb.
They wouldn't spend five minutes thinking about it. It's a no brainer.
Heh, at least if he's white. Maybe it'd be different if he was black.
Now, the reason why this matters, is that I find the plot of "random jerkoffs from the internet fucking with chris' life" to be less amusing than "chris fucks up his own life".
Chris admits to being coerced on other stupid stuff, yet he still proudly claims bisexual pride and gay behavior after the threat is removed?
Chris was recently exploited in various ways, some sexual, some violent, some financial. I do not find his erratic sexual behavior to be natural/genuine in that context.
