Bad webcomics

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The art is the only thing good about that comic. How on earth can the writing be so awful?

Life long bitterness and anger that people aren't sucking them off for basic everyday achievements. So they are pouring all their "take that" tier deviant art wish fulfillment into it.

95% of these comics are just that, or people glorifying depression and how "I'M SO SAD! FEEL BAD FOR ME" tier pity.

Instead of using booze as an escape like most people did for the majority of human history they are using shitty comics and twitter.
 
Last edited:
Rejected Princesses did a piece on Isabelle of France, who married Edward II of England. (And supposedly had him killed by shoving a red hot poker up his ass, although this is most likely an urban legend)

Do these idiots think there have never been gay royals in history, or that most royal marriages were for love, no matter WHAT your orientation was?
(I'm a HUGE royalty buff. So don't get me started)
 
Life long bitterness and anger that people aren't sucking them off for basic everyday achievements. So they are pouring all their "take that" tier deviant art wish fulfillment into it.

95% of these comics are just that, or people glorying depression and how "I'M SO SAD! FEEL BAD FOR ME" tier pity.

Instead of using liquor as an escape like most people did for most of human history they are using shitty comics and twitter.


What bugs me is how "first world problems" these comics are. Oh no, I'm a white male feeling sad that my life isn't up to society's standards! Half of the time isn't even real depression and instead ennui or even better "adulting-is-hard".

I'm depressed at how successful these comics are.
 
My main issue is that the art is so fucking ugly.

Speaking of ugly art... I've come across Growing Up Aspie.

All the normal people are these weird alien looking beings, the guy strawmans to death, and yeah, his art is super ugly.

20863219_1898358913711930_2242187846615698891_o.jpg


His tshirts he makes are awful too.
 
Uh, is that supposed to make any kind of sense, or is it just "random access humor"?

If that's accurate history, then I'm glad of that. But...did they draw Philippa black?


It's explained in the footnotes. Apparently there's some debate over it. She could just had a dark complexion. My grandfather, for example, was a big ol' hunky, but he was olive-skinned.
 
Uh, is that supposed to make any kind of sense, or is it just "random access humor"?

Its supposed to be "I know that feel" for aspies, I think.

Rejected Princesses did a piece on Isabelle of France, who married Edward II of England. (And supposedly had him killed by shoving a red hot poker up his ass, although this is most likely an urban legend)

Do these idiots think there have never been gay royals in history, or that most royal marriages were for love, no matter WHAT your orientation was?
(I'm a HUGE royalty buff. So don't get me started)

The problem with history declaring folks gay is often the "sources" are little more than court or international slander.
 
The problem with history declaring folks gay is often the "sources" are little more than court or international slander.

That is very true. I can't but think sometimes that historians will look back over the records of the Internet and declare that as many as 90% of people were gay and subject to incredible discrimination, based solely on people casually calling each other "faggot".
 
The problem with history declaring folks gay is often the "sources" are little more than court or international slander.
Many kings had close male friends, Gaveston's closeness to Edward the II is not unusual at at all. Hell being super close to the king became an official court position, the groom of throne who knew all of the king's secrets, wiped the king's ass and probably shaved his balls too.
 
Rejected Princesses did a piece on Isabelle of France, who married Edward II of England. (And supposedly had him killed by shoving a red hot poker up his ass, although this is most likely an urban legend)

Do these idiots think there have never been gay royals in history, or that most royal marriages were for love, no matter WHAT your orientation was?
(I'm a HUGE royalty buff. So don't get me started)
I'm admittedly not the most well-versed person in the world about European history, but from the way this reads almost like a reverse yaoi fanfic where instead of an evil harpy getting in the way of the "pure soft gaybies uwu" it's a poor misaligned woman being double-teamed by the patriarchy and the gay agenda, I'm going to assume that this is a rather exaggerated/one-sided take of the events.

Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't stuff like overlooking the finances and assisting in negotiations with nobles already expected of queens even back then? Why are they acting as though Isabelle went above and beyond?
 
Back