Diseased #Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Well, there's the various incarnations of the Cheetah, who makes Mola Ram feel as funny as Mola Ram's Halloween avatar is making a bunch of you feel. But my favorite would be ... Egg Fu:

View attachment 557877

I rather suspect he wouldn't fly in 2018.
Late but Egg Fu still exists and has been making appearances. Mostly as a side character in Harley Quinn. The stereotypical Asian face was dropped though.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BestUserName
This, sadly, is rather true. There are exceptions to this... but they're firmly outside of the capeshit genre ('Love and Rockets' and 'Strangers in Paradise' come to mind for me).

Strangely, I don't see anyone on either side of CG pointing out books like Terry Moore's bibliography or the Hernandez Brothers' magnum opus as examples of books with genuine diversity and themes that would otherwise be classified as socjus pandering. Much less other comics/graphic novels, like 'Fun Home' (which has a hugely popular Broadway musical adaptation), 'Persepolis', Rana Telegmeier's entire bibliography (which outsells capeshit by a huge margin), 'American Born Chinese', 'Saga', etc. Even 'Meg, Mogg, & Owl', ffs. I guess if it's not capeshit, it doesn't fit either narrative.

And really, that's what this largely boils down to: cape comics are the big genre when it comes to Western comics, ergo the socjus types believe that crowbarring their ideology into it will do... something. They don't see the forest for the trees, and don't lift up the creators and titles that actually check off all the boxes next to their demands. And the pro-CG crowd aren't pointing these aforementioned titles out as good examples of what the comics medium is capable of and encouraging them to do what they're doing: make/crowdfund their own comics with the stories they want to see.

The anti-CG side occasionally mentions books like that, but I doubt anyone on the pro-CG side would be caught reading those books.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BestUserName
Strangely everyone forgets that Spider-Woman had quite a Media presence and even her own Saturday morning cartoon.

Here’s the gods honest truth regarding female Super Hero books. It is next to impossible to have a long term success with a solo book, because you are greatly limited in the lack of horrible things you can do to the main character. You can’t abuse a female character in the ways you can a male. Which tends to restrict the drama over time. Wonder Woman has really been the lone standout. For most other successful female led solo books you either need humor, or targeting a much younger demographic. Otherwise you end up with things like Captain Marvel’s Seven Relaunches in Five Years because they can’t hit basic sales thresholds.
Meanwhile, those goddamn relaunches get glowing press while decent books continue to be ignored.

I've talked before about how goddamn autistic scans_daily is, but at least they introduced me to Astro City, which is actually pretty good -- but I'd never even HEARD of it prior to s_d posting some scans of the comic.
 
The anti-CG side occasionally mentions books like that, but I doubt anyone on the pro-CG side would be caught reading those books.

I love Terry's art and have bought his books before, but he strikes me as a Dan Harmon-esque feminist in that he's so aggressively pro-woman that you can't help but think he has a mountain of (female) skeletons in his closet.
 
Some GamerGaters are worked up over Erik Larsen's Savage Dragon #236 with an accusation of child pornography.

Here's the panel in question:
Savage Dragon #236 panel.jpg

Drawn pornography of minors is likely to be illegal in certain countries like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, France, and others:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors

One Redditor claims: "... Which means that Erik Larson is now officially a distributor of child porn, as is Comixology & Image."

Full page for context:
Savage Dragon #236 Little Dragons.jpg

Another Redditor points out that the TV predicts events 2 panels ahead (if only the baby didn't crash through the wall): "... the frames on the TV sort of mirror the panels of the two dragon kid’s fighting, so I feel like there’s supposed to be some subtle connection, there (and the black-skin dragon kid’s face makes it look like he’s noticed the similarities, and is grossed out)."
 
The anti-CG side occasionally mentions books like that, but I doubt anyone on the pro-CG side would be caught reading those books.

Why? Terry Moore is a legend. Yes Pro-GG is largely fans of the Cape Shit that they grew up with. That doesn't mean that they don't know of or even occasionally like examples of the medium being used for other genres. Heck that is the proper path for growth of the industry.
 
Some GamerGaters are worked up over Erik Larsen's Savage Dragon #236 with an accusation of child pornography.

While inarguably in bad taste (especially as a C&H fan), I think it's quite hyperbolic to call that "child pornography." What makes porn porn is that it was specifically created for salacious purposes - masturbation fuel - and it's a pretty big stretch to say that that's the artist had when creating that drawing, or that the general public would be able to use it for that purpose. For example, the appearance of Bruce Wayne's little sidekick in that recent Batman book isn't pornography either.

Full page for context:

Yeah… I still have no idea what's going on there. Can someone explain it? Who are these characters?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 558706
You know, thinking about this tweet it almost captures everything about current Marvel writing standards.
A bad late, forced attempt at humor (Mark Raid as an exterminator is at least pun worthy), ZaNiNeSs, self and companion validation ending with go educate yourself

Mark Waid is so staggeringly ignorant of the law (he tortiously interfered with a contract and bragged about doing so on Twitter) that he probably "has his hair blown back" by a lawyer who managed to sit the bar exam without gouging his own eyes out with a #2 pencil.
 
While inarguably in bad taste (especially as a C&H fan), I think it's quite hyperbolic to call that "child pornography." What makes porn porn is that it was specifically created for salacious purposes - masturbation fuel - and it's a pretty big stretch to say that that's the artist had when creating that drawing, or that the general public would be able to use it for that purpose. For example, the appearance of Bruce Wayne's little sidekick in that recent Batman book isn't pornography either.
Have you read [current year] Savage Dragon? It's become Erik's spank fuel, just take a look:
RCO005_w.jpg RCO007_w.jpg RCO009.jpg RCO010.jpg RCO014.jpg RCO015.jpg RCO009 (1).jpg Image-100-2-600x530.png
RCO013.jpg
 
What the shit? I can remember back when Savage Dragon was over the top goofy, but it was never outright pr0n. When did Larsen decide he'd rather draw fapbait?
 
And the art's not good enough to be fappable. It's like the asian lady (his wife, I think?) is drawn as pie-faced and boyish as possible.
I think I remember a tear down of this page, too. Basically how the anatomy is borked and the face looks like she's had a stroke.

Of course I could easily have gotten this mixed up with a webcomic. That's how bad the art is.
 
Back