Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It really has devolved into "are you living in a democratic hellscape of identity politics and racism against whites? Then vote no or lose your job. Do you live anywhere else? Vote Yes or lose your job."

American politics is hilarious ATM. Best timeline.
Shit is so fucking wacky right now and I love it.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Flexo
You haven't actually researched that watchlist, have you?
KKK affiliates and the militia movement are going to save America?

dammit, the key vote is going on and I habve to go to work.
this sucks
Don't fear the actual vote is tomorrow. Today was just a vote to have the vote.

That's the leader of the Women's march and notorious Islamist Linda Sarsour. She's pro-FGM, anti-semetic, anti-capitalist, vocally supports Palistianian terror against Israel and terror attacks against the U.S. yet she is a leader of the women's march because lol.

220px-Linda_Sarsour.jpg
Don't forget that she also advocates for Sharia Law

Not as much of a surprise on Manchin, if he's hoping to maintain his seat he'll have to fall in line a bit. West Virginia voted around 70% in favor of Trump during the 2016 election so going against your states choice for President might be a bit of a bad idea. Murkowski is effectively a RINO so her duplicity is hardly surprising.
She is quite possibly the worst in the group. Murkowski lost to a tea party candidate in her primary and still ran a campaign when the whole tea party thing was going down. That's so scummy, and she probably knows she can get away with this shit because she has 4 years. I really can't understand why someone would vote no for non-partisan reasons though. Maybe some Democrats offered her support for pork spending or something
 
The only thing I see in play for the next 30 hours is Ford's therapy notes, which Grassley has already requested she deliver to the Senate but which her counsel wants to turn over to the FBI. Grassley already correctly pointed out to Ford's counsel that the only thing the FBI would do is turn those notes over to the Senate. I don't believe they've sent a reply yet.

Based on what Grassley said in that letter, I think he already knows what to expect.

Lastly, because I'm frustrated: Murkowski did a tremendous disservice to women by putting feelings over facts. Women already fight a lasting stereotype that we are irrational, ruled by emotion, and easily swayed by moral panic. So she votes no, then out and out admits in the interview afterward that she weighed the qualifications of a "good man" (her words) against her feelings and the bigger issues at stake and the man came up short.

Go to hell, Lisa.
 
I've rarely seen any right-wing news or twitter outlets declare that (at least not in any reasonably large abundance). Only ones I've seen making such claims in abundance that Kavanaugh will do just that are left-wing news outlets or blogs using fear-mongering. Only right-wings I've seen opposing Kavanaugh are /pol/ and some neocons in a similar vein to Murkowski. Half of /pol/ is just screaming that Kavanaugh is actually a "kike-bred christ-cuck anti-white spy" in cahoots with "Trumpstein and Israel", while diehard neocons have been firmly against Kavanaugh from the start and are running off to join the dems while declaring Trump and Kavanaugh traitors to America.
I haven't heard anyone outright say he'd do it but the talk-radio types are implying he might and desperately hoping he will. Minus Rush Limbaugh who out and out said that's just not going to happen.
 
How much does the media want a war on Russia right now?
With it becoming more likely that Kavanaugh's confirmation is in the bag, it's back to their usual programming.

Not as much of a surprise on Manchin, if he's hoping to maintain his seat he'll have to fall in line a bit. West Virginia voted around 70% in favor of Trump during the 2016 election so going against your states choice for President might be a bit of a bad idea. Murkowski is effectively a RINO so her duplicity is hardly surprising.
Why the fuck is Manchin still a Democrap? Rhetorical question, but yeah... None are going to let him sit with them in the Capitol Building cafeteria, and if this debacle was a few months earlier, they would have brought in Soros to throw more money at Swearengin in the primary.
 
Last edited:
It was impossible to get through to my senator over the phone for most of the day. I don't know if that's normal or not.

Why the fuck is Manchin still a Democrap? Rhetorical question, but yeah... None are going to let him sit with them in the Capitol Building cafeteria, and if this debacle was a few months earlier, they would have brought in Soros and thrown more money at Swearengin in the primary.
What kind of cocksucking hooplehead would vote for Swearengin.
 
The only thing I see in play for the next 30 hours is Ford's therapy notes, which Grassley has already requested she deliver to the Senate but which her counsel wants to turn over to the FBI. Grassley already correctly pointed out to Ford's counsel that the only thing the FBI would do is turn those notes over to the Senate. I don't believe they've sent a reply yet.

Based on what Grassley said in that letter, I think he already knows what to expect.

Lastly, because I'm frustrated: Murkowski did a tremendous disservice to women by putting feelings over facts. Women already fight a lasting stereotype that we are irrational, ruled by emotion, and easily swayed by moral panic. So she votes no, then out and out admits in the interview afterward that she weighed the qualifications of a "good man" (her words) against her feelings and the bigger issues at stake and the man came up short.

Go to hell, Lisa.
People like her need to be dragged into the sun and have their bullshit exposed in front of the world. How do people memory hole things like this? People can hold grudges for their entire lives but somehow politicians get away with this crap all the time. The world is a mysterious place...
 
The only thing I see in play for the next 30 hours is Ford's therapy notes, which Grassley has already requested she deliver to the Senate but which her counsel wants to turn over to the FBI. Grassley already correctly pointed out to Ford's counsel that the only thing the FBI would do is turn those notes over to the Senate. I don't believe they've sent a reply yet.

Based on what Grassley said in that letter, I think he already knows what to expect.

Lastly, because I'm frustrated: Murkowski did a tremendous disservice to women by putting feelings over facts. Women already fight a lasting stereotype that we are irrational, ruled by emotion, and easily swayed by moral panic. So she votes no, then out and out admits in the interview afterward that she weighed the qualifications of a "good man" (her words) against her feelings and the bigger issues at stake and the man came up short.

Go to hell, Lisa.

Now now dear. Don't get angry I don't want to break out the medicinal Brandy to calm you down.
 
04379f45fe018c6fa5050db1acfc3f3a.png

I actually missed that article the first pass around. I kind of wish that I'd missed it the second time, too. Years and years spent berating men for "being emotionless" and "hyper-macho" and expressing "toxic masculinity" and the second they get the opportunity, they start wailing on Kavanaugh for tearing up during his hearing. What a load of absolute horseshit.
 
Last edited:
Back