Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indeed, if it were I who was having newspapers just casually suggesting that I was molesting my children because at worst I coped a feel 30 years ago I know I would just smile and not get angry.

Anyway, this vote may end up being the most watch-worthy vote in Senate history. I refuse to believe that someone like Kamala Harris isn't going to try some "last minute heroics" that will be utterly embarrassing.
Pretty Sure Kamala is House of Representatives, not Senate. Along with the rest of the nuts like Pelosi.
 
Screen shot 2018-10-05 at 3.28.53 PM.png

Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?

>We can say goodbye to affirmative action
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I hope that fucking dies regardless if it goes to the Supreme Court.

Oh wait, this explains why they're so fixated on affirmative action:
Screen shot 2018-10-05 at 3.36.25 PM.png


>All because people were led to believe that Trump and Hillary would be equally bad.
:story: Because it was "her turn". Sure thing, buttercup.
 
I'm pretty convinced a not-insignificant portion of the soyboys vigorously opposing Kavanaugh are projecting their chad bullies onto him.
Yep. My favorite part is that the soyboys just don't understand that everyone gets bullied a little, and that they are not specially persecuted. Everyone has to roll with the punches, and the soyboy shit you do to people is also bullying. When you scoff at chad for being simple (he often isn't), make nasty jokes about him, or tattle on teachers about minor rule-breaking he does you are bullying him. Guess what he is gonna do about it?

Of course now the soyboys have been playing this bully chad game again thinking that they hold the power now and are gonna get one back, but guess what, most people kinda like chad and think he's a nice guy. You've seen this as part of the muscular Republican resurgence that is a direct response to the prog left bullying.
 
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.
Judge Kavanaugh has a relatively consistent track record (Not surprising cause he's a candidate for fucking SCOTUS) but there are a few things that as a liberal I fundamentally disagree about:
- He's in favor of metadata collection program by the US which basically allows the US to monitor the duration of your calls and who you're calling without a warrant. Can't see how that can be abused.
- He's against Net Neutrality.
- He's for allowing more public funds go to Religious School and other Religious "Educational" Institutions.
- He isn't a complete autist like the other Republicans when it comes to climate change but he says that should be an issue for the legislative branch to handle because he thinks new laws should be created to tackle it. The executive branch should be the one in charge of this issue because their are already laws to handle this issue and the executive should be enforcing it (my opinion is a lot more nuance on this but just gonna simplfy so I don't have a long tism spasm.)
 
Yes it’s Susan Collins that’s the disgrace, not anti-Semitic, Sharia Now, sexual assault enabler Linda Sarsour.

This is another good reason why I don’t want to be associated with the left nor blindly support it and enjoy seeing them lose publicly. The left continues to prop up horrible people which then enables them to be horrible to others.
 
Pretty Sure Kamala is House of Representatives, not Senate. Along with the rest of the nuts like Pelosi.
Nope

She was part of the group of senators that walked out of the committee meeting and started REEEEEing in the halls. Either here or Cory Boker are probably going to start shouting LISTEN AND BELIEVE when the votes are being cast
 
View attachment 559880
Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?

>We can say goodbye to affirmative action
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I hope that fucking dies regardless if it goes to the Supreme Court.

Oh wait, this explains why they're so fixated on affirmative action:
View attachment 559890

>All because people were led to believe that Trump and Hillary would be equally bad.
:story: Because it was "her turn". Sure thing, buttercup.
Look I get thinking abortion probably not even going to be kicked back to the states (as a worst case scenario) and affirmative action are going away, and I personally hope they are struck down and are done away with. What I don't get is this whole birth control thing. Nobody wants to take birth control away. It's not gonna happen.
 
They have their own police agency dedicated to close protection and securing the Supreme Court itself, DC is chock full of niche police forces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_Police

Honestly if you're in DC and you're not travelling in a armoured, jet black SUV that ignores speed limits you're basically a peasant.

Apparently you can rent them for a mere $1600 a day or about $593,000 a year.

https://armoredcarsforrent.checkfro...-chevrolet-suburban-4x4-suv-washington-dc-usa
 
Sometimes I can't believe this woman isn't a rightwing plant.
Honestly if you're in DC and you're not travelling in a armoured, jet black SUV that ignores speed limits you're basically a peasant.

Apparently you can rent them for a mere $1600 a day or about $593,000 a year.

https://armoredcarsforrent.checkfro...-chevrolet-suburban-4x4-suv-washington-dc-usa
lol, renting for a year. You can buy em for less than half that depending on the package.. Like 5 years ago there was a lot of I think 6 up-armored Suburbans that were supposed to go to Iraq, but the firm's contract was cancelled so they welched on the vics or something like that. Some intermediary was trying to offload them for the low price of $90k a pop. I still kick myself sometimes for not buying one.
 
Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.
Judge Kavanaugh has a relatively consistent track record (Not surprising cause he's a candidate for fucking SCOTUS) but there are a few things that as a liberal I fundamentally disagree about:
- He's in favor of metadata collection program by the US which basically allows the US to monitor the duration of your calls and who you're calling without a warrant. Can't see how that can be abused.
- He's against Net Neutrality.
- He's for allowing more public funds go to Religious School and other Religious "Educational" Institutions.
- He isn't a complete autist like the other Republicans when it comes to climate change but he says that should be an issue for the legislative branch to handle because he thinks new laws should be created to tackle it. The executive branch should be the one in charge of this issue because their are already laws to handle this issue and the executive should be enforcing it (my opinion is a lot more nuance on this but just gonna simplfy so I don't have a long tism spasm.)
This is an opinion I can respect. To be fair, as far as environmental issues being a legislative issue, I do agree there, mostly to limit the executive power. Have them create the penalties.
 
By the way, for those not familiar with why the Democrats are acting like this over Kavanaugh, I am just going to point out that they are using all twenty of these diversion tactics employed in narcissistic abuse.

It's really quite understandable when you realize that the people doing the shrieking are entitled, insecure fucks with no conscience who get off to the idea of having power over other people.
 
Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.
Judge Kavanaugh has a relatively consistent track record (Not surprising cause he's a candidate for fucking SCOTUS) but there are a few things that as a liberal I fundamentally disagree about:
- He's in favor of metadata collection program by the US which basically allows the US to monitor the duration of your calls and who you're calling without a warrant. Can't see how that can be abused.
- He's against Net Neutrality.
- He's for allowing more public funds go to Religious School and other Religious "Educational" Institutions.
- He isn't a complete autist like the other Republicans when it comes to climate change but he says that should be an issue for the legislative branch to handle because he thinks new laws should be created to tackle it. The executive branch should be the one in charge of this issue because their are already laws to handle this issue and the executive should be enforcing it (my opinion is a lot more nuance on this but just gonna simplfy so I don't have a long tism spasm.)
He's pretty much a relatively generic neocon judicially, but saying that he probably won't overturn Citizens United doesn't get people as fired up as HE'S AN ALCOHOLIC LITERAL RAPIST AND PROBABLY A PEDOPHILE TOO AND HE'S GOING TO MAKE THE HANDMAID'S TALE REAL
 
Last edited:
Nope

She was part of the group of senators that walked out of the committee meeting and started REEEEEing in the halls. Either here or Cory Boker are probably going to start shouting LISTEN AND BELIEVE when the votes are being cast
She's a US Senator on the Judiciary Committee from California.
Sigh, and here I was hoping she was on the level of Sheila Jackson Lee and Hank Johnson. Sorry.
 
View attachment 559880
Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?

>We can say goodbye to affirmative action
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I hope that fucking dies regardless if it goes to the Supreme Court.

Oh wait, this explains why they're so fixated on affirmative action:
View attachment 559890

>All because people were led to believe that Trump and Hillary would be equally bad.
:story: Because it was "her turn". Sure thing, buttercup.

"For working people"

Does the people that got a job thanks to Trump new policies count?
 
Back