Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
reddit respects women until they make the wrong decisions:

Screenshot_Sync_Pro_20181005-215755-01.jpeg

https://www.reddit.com/r/maine/comments/9lpbz9
 
Lovecraft is better.

Based Lovecraft would have helped Kavanaugh kill all the darkies and rape all the roasties.
When, long ago, the gods created Earth
In Jove's fair image Man was shaped at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were next designed;
Yet were they too remote from humankind.
To fill the gap, and join the rest to Man,
Th'Olympian host conceiv'd a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Filled it with vice, and called the thing a Nigger.
 
Funny how the femtards made assumptions that Kavanaugh was a rapist because he likes beer. I'm thinking they're stereotyping his Irish ethnicity because Irish men must love getting drunk from beer (so much for the left claiming not to be racists).
Should be worth noting that the Temperance Movement was primarily spearheaded by the feminist suffragettes and the Irish back in those years were viewed to be literally the White Niggers for the reasons you stated above

Seeing how much they're treating anyone that has touched a bottle of beer as a devil worshiping ner do well, guess you can say now the banshees are just going back to their roots

Anyway, how's this for a hashtag
#KEGSFORKAVENAUGH
 
This is so stupid, not only because Ford's testimony was bullshit, but also because Kavanaugh wasn't even accused of rape to begin with. All Ford had to say was that he fondled her on a bed apparently lol. But that's LITERAL RAPE!!! You're all RAPE APOLOGISTS!!! #BelieveSurvivors!!! Even when the people that were the survivors' witnesses say that shit never happened and they've never even met... :sighduck:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that it went from a groping to a rape right in front of everyone, and nobody in the room (let alone Twitter) questioned it.
 
View attachment 560034
They really cannot meme.

As someone who spends a lot of time working in photoshop, the sheer incompetency of this actually pisses me off. They couldn't even size the text on the box right, let alone get the color right or use a similar looking font (every windows computer has arial and every mac has helvetica). And too top it all off there are tons of jpeg artifacts like this thing was made in MS paint.
 
I love how every leftie's only response to this is "you'll be remembered badly!" It's literally a cartoon villain going "YOU MAY HAVE OUTSMARTED ME THIS TIME, BOOKWORM! BUT I'LL BE BACK!"

This is all they can do, it's all the left has ever said. They can't think of how they can affect things, what the here and now is, how current events are. It's all "the right side", "glory to the empire" like they're brainwashed. They build their entire campaign on a "dream", because that's all it is. They never propose practical solutions or alternatives, they can only demand and control. That's not how society works, that's just a totalitarian dictatorship. They can't, or just refuse to, think of current events. It's all "this is how we'll be remembered."

Also I'm giddy as an aunt right now, threads like these are why I come here.
 
I'd like to take back what I said about Collins's speech being overly long and just bloviating. She laid out the entire thing in a fairly center way that gives a lot of cover to people who will vote to confirm Kavanaugh, and she basically did a point by point takedown of those voting against him for anything but partisan reasons. I was just mad because I wanted to know how she was gonna vote without watching for 10 min
 
I see some of the MSM is now trying to claim a spark of hope in this day of disappointment for them. Now in their latest articles on the midterms, they are predicting that since the Supreme Court seat is now sorted out, Republican voters will not show up in November since there's a whole month between now and then for the outrage over the Supreme Court seat to subside. Also, they are falling over themselves to remind their audience that there has only been one midterm poll (the NPR one) conducted since the Supreme Court confirmation process began.
 
Y'all, this is how you lose the fencesitters. How 'bout instead of dicking around and trying to claim the high-ground you make sure you actually have a fucking case to stand on? I was perfectly neutral to this whole thing until you got everything you wanted and still cried fowl. Seriously, I'd might have even taken your side if you took the L and bowed out gracefully but no. More antics.

I think it was mentioned elsewhere that most of the seats the Democrats are counting on are shoo-in wins for them. when it comes to the seats that are more tightly-contested, those appear to be a toss-up at best right now. One can only wonder how many undecided voters - and independent ones for that matter - will show up to vote and seriously consider voting Republican even if it's merely a symbolic vote against this Democrat-initiated shitstorm.

I'm really tired of this. Rape is like any other crime, it isn't magically special. Its terrible, yes. But no crime deserves to have the presumption of innocence eliminated.

I would even go as far as to argue that the presumption of innocence becomes more crucial when the accusations are more heinous because of what's at stake.

Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.

@Superman93, you may be the first person - if not one of the few - I've seen that civilly expressed logical reasons for not wanting Judge Kavanaugh confirmed. I'm not sure what it means to see such a well-expressed dissenting opinion shared here of all places.
 
One Of You Should Just Leak Me The FBI Report
It’s the very least you could do.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...h-report-senators_us_5bb79bade4b01470d05146cd
View attachment 559868
We do not know what was in the FBI’s most recent background check into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The report was locked away in a secure room in the basement of the Capitol Visitor Center, where Democratic and Republican senators read it over in alternating shifts, applying or ignoring the evidence contained therein to a decision that will affect millions and millions of lives.

The only thing less democratic about the process here is basically everything else about the Supreme Court.

But we do know how this profound deficit of the old democratic spirit could be remedied: Senators, just tell me what was in the report. FBI, leak it to me.

Here’s what some Democratic senators have said about the report, which contained summaries of the FBI’s interviews and of which we American citizens are not allowed to know the actual contents.

From Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.):

“One: This was not a full and fair investigation. It was sharply limited in scope and did not explore the relevant confirming facts.

Two: The available documents do not exonerate Mr. Kavanaugh.

And three: The available documents contradict statements Mr. Kavanaugh made under oath.”

From Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) :

“It is simply impossible after seeing the results of the FBI supplemental work — and I hesitate to call it an investigation — that anybody could think that it was in any way shape or form the comprehensive investigation the president promised.”

From Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.):

“The most notable part of this report is what’s not in it.”

And here’s what the Republicans said about the report.

From Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.):

“What we know for sure is the FBI report did not corroborate any of the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.”

From Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.):

“We’ve seen no additional corroborating information.”

There’s no actual way of knowing who’s telling the truth. Democrats will assume Democrats are telling the truth; Republicans will assume the same of other Republicans. The dozen centrists in the country will believe The New York Times opinion section.

Meanwhile, a president whom the majority of the country did not vote for is installing a justice on a Supreme Court that already had a seat hijacked and stolen by Senate Republicans, who were only ever in a position to do so because of decades of gerrymandering and voter suppression.

This is not how a healthy democracy functions. But there is a way to start to correct these profound injustices: What if you just told me what was in the FBI report? You’ll all feel much better! I know I will.

So, are you a senator? An FBI employee who helped with the investigation? Do you want to do me and the country — nay, democracy itself — a solid? Email ashley.feinberg@huffpost.com. It’s the least you could do.

Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here’s how.
http://archive.is/F7J5D

Reminder that Diane Fienstein was the one who doesn't want the FBI report released.
 
Back