Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These idiots must think Kavanaugh will be Chief Judge from Judge Dredd.

Who knew nominating a man to the Supreme Court was like issuing a death sentence to trannies, blacks, the disabled, immigrants, gays.

View attachment 560115
Justice Kavanaugh will singlehandedly revoke the Americans with Disabilities Act, instantly causing handicap parking spaces, access ramps, Braille signs, and restroom handholds to vanish into thin air. Blind, immobilized cripples will die where they sit in their shit-stained wheelchairs. It will be Aktion T4 USA.
 
lol dont worry dear is never going to happen and all thanks to you

View attachment 560071

Translation; A Lawyer for Christine Blankley Ford has advised her to shut the fuck up. She has already committed perjury and thankfully nobody has started noticing enough to press charges... YET. So shut the fuck up and pray it all goes away!!!
 
Should be worth noting that the Temperance Movement was primarily spearheaded by the feminist suffragettes and the Irish back in those years were viewed to be literally the White Niggers for the reasons you stated above

Seeing how much they're treating anyone that has touched a bottle of beer as a devil worshiping ner do well, guess you can say now the banshees are just going back to their roots

Anyway, how's this for a hashtag
#KEGSFORKAVENAUGH

Guinness kegs to be more precise! Get those Irish stout beer ready! I need some so I can make some killer stout brownies.

These idiots must think Kavanaugh will be Chief Judge from Judge Dredd.

Who knew nominating a man to the Supreme Court was like issuing a death sentence to trannies, blacks, the disabled, immigrants, gays.

View attachment 560115

Yeah because Daniel Crenshaw and Greg Abbott are totally evil Republicans too despite them being disabled as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
drink.gif
 
repubhatewomen.png


brett1.jpg

They really do hate women.

It's long been frowned upon to acknowledge this fundamental truth: Misogyny is at the heart of right-wing politics. Pointing out that hatred of women and a desire to keep them under the boot is an animating force of Republican politics is sure to draw pained expressions from many liberal men, certain that the feminists are being hysterical again. Surely feminists don't think it's quite as simple as that, right? Surely we understand that anti-abortion views are about a sincere belief that life begins at conception and anyway, Republicans aren't serious when they say they're going to ban abortion. That's just something they say to rile up the rubes, to trick them into voting for the real agenda, which is about economics and taxes. Certainly you women can't think you are important enough that oppressing you is a major priority for Republicans, right?

We're not hearing that argument much these days, though the price that had to be paid for the wake-up call was steep indeed: The election of a gloating misogynist who brags about his lengthy career sexual assault. Now the Senate, with Friday's cloture vote to move forward with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, is one step from seating a piggish frat boy who has been credibly accused of abusive sexual conduct by multiple women to the Supreme Court. Once there, he will almost certainly be the fifth vote to gut abortion rights and to start chipping away at LGBT rights and contraception access.

Click for Sound
In his famous 2004 book, "What's the Matter With Kansas," Thomas Frank laid down the argument that became almost a doctrine in some quarters of the left, which was that gender politics and the culture war and gender politic were just distractions thrown up by Republicans to bait the masses into voting against their economic self-interest. Frank wrote that culture war politics "may count when conservatives appear on the stump," but "once conservatives are in office the only old-fashioned situation they care to revive is an economic regimen of low wages and lax regulations."

"Abortion is never halted. Affirmative action is never abolished," he intoned, setting up a decade-plus of liberal men, right through the 2016 election, insinuating that feminist priorities like electing more women to office were a distraction from real issues. That pressure campaign was largely successful, leaving many women too ashamed to be frumpy feminists who were mysteriously undermining the progressive cause to get excited about the possibility of electing a feminist like Hillary Clinton.

Seems like feminists aren't being shamed into silence so easily these days. The videos populating social media from the protests at the Hart Senate Building are a cacophony of mostly female voices raised high, screaming disapproval of the Kavanaugh nomination and no longer intimidated by accusations that they are shrill, hysterical or, heaven help us, not sexy. And Republican reactions strongly suggest their misogyny is more than an act put on to bamboozle the yokels.

"I want to make it clear to these people who are chasing my members around the hall here or harassing them at the airports or going to their homes, we’re not going to be intimidated by these people," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said of the protesters.

“When you grow up, I’ll be glad to [speak to you],” Sen. Orrin Hatch snapped at a group of protesters, equating grown women with children who need a scolding.

“You needed to go to the cops,” Sen. Lindsey Graham told another protester when she confronted him about her own history of rape, implying that he -- with no information about her situation -- understood her options better than she did.

Sen. Ben Sasse dismissed the protests by women against Kavanaugh as "hysteria" three times during the original confirmation hearing, when the focus was primarily on reproductive rights and before sexual assault became an issue.

Donald Trump, of course, is screeching on Twitter about how the protesters are "paid" and funded by "Soros," because it is impossible for him imagine that women might actually have minds of their own.

Let's be clear that the women clogging up the halls of Congress are not paid or idiots or children or harpies. These protests are being led by women who are speaking out about their own experiences with sexual abuse. This dismissal of the intelligence or honesty of sexual assault survivors is sadly not surprising. That is how women's stories of sexual abuse have been discredited since forever. That's how Christine Blasey Ford's moving testimony against Kavanaugh is being discredited. This has nothing to do with what's true or most believable or most backed by evidence. It's about asserting that women's voices have no value, no matter what they're saying or how true it is.

Feminists have had fun with our jokes about "misandry" or "well-behaved women seldom make history" bumper stickers. But truth be told, most of us have still lived in the abiding hope that being good girls who ask nicely will get us closer to equality. Certainly that was the main theme of Clinton's campaign, which highlighted her hard work, her qualifications and her demeanor of grandmotherly kindness. Her supporters largely followed that lead, keeping their gripes about sexism to private Facebook groups and listservs and putting on a cheerful face to the world.

For that, Clinton got called a "nasty woman" and lost anyway.

Christine Blasey Ford's testimony was more of the same. She had a soft, girlish voice and a winsome demeanor, completely without guile. She was vulnerable, not angry. She came across as someone who really believed that if the Senate knew the truth, it would do the right thing.

Now she's getting smeared as a liar or a crazy woman and lost anyway.

In the instant classic work of feminist philosophy, "Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny," Kate Manne disputes the naive conception of misogyny as some sort of knee-jerk hatred of women. Instead, she argues that it's about the policing of women. A misogynist is perfectly happy with women if they behave the way he wants them to, by being servile and pleasing. But when women start to resist their assigned role and start insisting on respect, justice and equality, the fangs will come out.

We saw the truth of Manne's theory play out throughout this Kavanaugh hearing. Oh, we heard so much about how Kavanaugh loved the silent, smiling women and girls who were brought out to flank him at every public appearance. A great deal of attention was paid to letting us know exactly how much Kavanaugh adores the women who populate his world and take orders from him, such as his law clerks and the girls on the basketball team he coaches.

But when women started saying no to him and started speaking up, he got red-faced, screaming and self-pitying. Republicans in Congress were so deeply moved by his performance because they, too, cannot believe these women who think they have a right to speak out. That was why it had to be Brett Kavanaugh, rather than substituting in some other right-wing judge with equivalent qualifications and fewer allegations of drunken sexual assault. Because Republican misogyny is not an act, and the party and its followers eagerly seized this opportunity to put women in their place.
https://www.salon.com/2018/10/05/so-its-true-republicans-really-do-hate-women/ - http://archive.is/scSV4
 
Meh, late to the party on that one, I remember on Election Night all the left-leaning women on my FB list posting something to the effect of "remember, a vote for Trump is a vote to set me back 150 years! Don't let the suffragettes down!" You already played the misogyny card, 2 years ago. It was declined. Would you like to use another form of payment?
 
As someone who spends a lot of time working in photoshop, the sheer incompetency of this actually pisses me off. They couldn't even size the text on the box right, let alone get the color right or use a similar looking font (every windows computer has arial and every mac has helvetica). And too top it all off there are tons of jpeg artifacts like this thing was made in MS paint.
0b1f62f677c9c5faf6722e0d8022c5de.jpg

Here, I made you a new one.
 
you may be the first person - if not one of the few - I've seen that civilly expressed logical reasons for not wanting Judge Kavanaugh confirmed. I'm not sure what it means to see such a well-expressed dissenting opinion shared here of all places.
To be honest, I don't like debates or lining explanations with logic and reason and all that gay shit especially over the internet. I came on these forums to laugh at exceptional individuals on the internet like everybody else. To be honest, seeing that other person's post just made me mad on the internet because rather than debating he's ideology he took the autistic route of selecting regressive leftist smear tactics and then claimed he wasn't a Democrat (either he is a Democrat or has heavy Democrat leanings) which was infuriating.
 
These idiots must think Kavanaugh will be Chief Judge from Judge Dredd.

Who knew nominating a man to the Supreme Court was like issuing a death sentence to trannies, blacks, the disabled, immigrants, gays.

View attachment 560115

I saw "disabled" and "literally" and "Murder" and thought for a moment that was a post by Reeeeeeeeebecca Hernandez
 
Meh, late to the party on that one, I remember on Election Night all the left-leaning women on my FB list posting something to the effect of "remember, a vote for Trump is a vote to set me back 150 years! Don't let the suffragettes down!" You already played the misogyny card, 2 years ago. It was declined. Would you like to use another form of payment?
the amusing thing is that "white women" seems to be a struggling demographic for the left to capture. They had more than 50% for Trump, more than 50% in favor of Kavanaugh (even higher than "white men"). The internalized misogyny is real, lol
 
I'm not going to bother reading through 194 pages, and this has probably been said before and I'm probably :late:, but remember when feminists got pissy when Margaret fucking Atwood told them to calm their titties and that all those sexual assault accusations were starting to look like a witch hunt?

The irony in all this is that the lady, back in the eighties, well, she wrote a little book called The Handmaid's Tale. You have some televangelist lady called Serena Joy Waterford (because let's get real subtle with the names here) who goes and publishes a shitty book about how women should stay in the kitchen. For some reason, that book causes a major regime change where some women are treated as cattle because they can give birth (well, honestly, the handmaidens' treatment makes no fucking sense considering they're like a "national resource", even if I absolutely hate to put it that way, but that's a topic for another day).

Meanwhile, amidst all the Harry Potter and 1984 comparisons, what's going on in our world? Well, Margaret Atwood and many other feminists like her are the ones who paved the way for those very witch hunts, even if that's not what they intended. Now, they have to deal with the consequences and how it went too far, like Serena Joy did. A lot of their fears ended up being true, albeit not in the way they intended it to be AT ALL. What pisses me off about the whole case is that the whole thing is so sloppy, and feminists don't seem to realize that shady accusations and unconditional belief in rape accusations is not helping actual victims. It actually just makes it harder for them, because, welp, people aren't idiots and they don't like being treated like cattle. The story of the little boy who cried wolf never gets old.

Long story short, when it comes to feminists... you either die falsely thinking you're June, or live long enough to become Serena Joy.
 
Back