Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jesus, RBG ain't gonna make it. There's an old expression when the tendons on the back of a person's neck stand out: "the elevens are up". It means the person is very close to death.
She looks like my grandmother did when we had to put her in hospice, the bobbling head and everything.
 
DpBb6gSWkAEbiwi.jpg

Some people enjoyed the swearing in ceremony more than others.

I love how grandfatherly Clarence is while Ruth's tapping into her inner antisocial vulture.
 
ask the ivory tower people in chat about us lol
They're just mad there isn't enough tranny girldick in this thread.

"Spoken like a #King" - I thought they were being facetious and this was going to end in a Kangz joke, but apparently not.
upload_2018-10-9_12-6-52.png


NY Rapper Mysonne Talks Rape Culture, Kavanaugh Outside Supreme Court
'We all look at Kavanaugh and we see some similarities to things that happened in our lives.' — This man perfectly described what it means to live in a rape culture

http://archive.is/xMz1d

Which lead to this :
Mysonne arrested while protesting Kavanaugh Vote.
Apparently just got out of jail for doing time for a robbery his "friend" committed. If that's true and let's assume it is, that's the kind of masochistic world he wants for all men? :story:
 
acee6754df066ed3f1f748c32fe24313.png

Translation: We've turned an otherwise moderate judicial pick into someone who has every reason to detest us for as long as he lives, and we'd really prefer if he not bludgeon us over the head for doing it.

If he did recuse himself, wouldn't that just be something else they would hang over his head since to them that is admitting he has a bias and possible conflicts of interest?
 
If he did recuse himself, wouldn't that just be something else they would hang over his head since to them that is admitting he has a bias and possible conflicts of interest?
They only play games where it's heads they win and tails you lose. Then they wonder why people decide to change the game.
 
It's also worth pointing out that for the past ten years at least the king-makers in elections have been independents, not the registered members of either party. Do you really think your average voter involved enough in politics to vote but unwilling to register with a particular party is going to look at this recent sideshow and think the Democrats are the ones worth putting in office?

I doubt there's going to be a wave of any kind, blue or red. Most people's minds are made up. Maybe this energized the hardcore base enough for some surprises but I'm going to guess the Democrats will suffer the usual problem of their base not showing up when they can't pick a new Queen and maybe a couple senators in states Trump won lose seats while Democrats have a few gains in the house. Not enough of a swing either way to be a game changer.
This is more or less how I see it with the possibility of the dems taking the house. Thing is, if the repubs keep the house and gain a couple senate seats that is a game changer.

It started shortly before his re-election, during Occupy Wall Street. I'm 100% convinced institutional support for SJW shit is because the bankers got scared about a potential class revolt and needed a way to get people to fight amongst themselves.
I would be more likely to see it this way if the progressive stack and all sorts of other SJW nonsense didn't sort of originate or at least first reslly rear its head durring the occupy movement

acee6754df066ed3f1f748c32fe24313.png

Translation: We've turned an otherwise moderate judicial pick into someone who has every reason to detest us for as long as he lives, and we'd really prefer if he not bludgeon us over the head for doing it.
So they don't want him to rule on like a third of the cases the Supreme Court sees. I'm sure that will happen. Why do they think the guy who stood up to their smear campaign and refused to recuse himself on Trump before that would suddenly cave? I guess this is just a way of keeping Kavanaugh in the news and at the top of people's minds through midterms, but if they want to do that, I say welcome
 
I would be more likely to see it this way if the progressive stack and all sorts of other SJW nonsense didn't sort of originate or at least first reslly rear its head durring the occupy movement

Uhh, yeah, why do you think they showed up? They would basically take over the discussion to bitch about their own issues over the matter at hand (establishing concrete arguments for uninformed bystanders, new tactics for getting people out of crackdowns and police kettling attempts safely, all the usual protester shit), until most of the original organizers, who actually cared about the supposed focus of Occupy Wall Street, would quit in exasperation because they were constantly sidelined for being too white or too male.

That's exactly how it went down at Occupy Seattle. None of the obnoxious tumblrinas who took over the protest were there at the start of it, they intervened a week or so afterwards and would constantly redirect attention whenever someone tried to focus the group back to the topic of finance reform and economic justice.
 
So they don't want him to rule on like a third of the cases the Supreme Court sees. I'm sure that will happen. Why do they think the guy who stood up to their smear campaign and refused to recuse himself on Trump before that would suddenly cave? I guess this is just a way of keeping Kavanaugh in the news and at the top of people's minds through midterms, but if they want to do that, I say welcome

This is a Classic Progressive Leftist move. "Make Up Rules That Don't exist and then use media to make everyone to believe that they do!!!" Not kidding here. "He Must Recuse!!!" Yeah, no! It's the Supreme Court. There are only 9 Judges. The only real expectations for Recusal are Things involving you directly. Such as if a Direct Family Member is involved. Or you in some way have a financial connection. The one other ethical expectation is that new Justices do not Rule on Cases they have already had a piece of, either as a Lower Court Judge or Litigant. But even that is "Optional". That's IT! None of this Political Bias Crap. Has Ginsberg Recused herself from every case involving the Executive Branch since the Trump Admin was sworn in? No. Case closed. (And no napping through the cases sadly does not count as a recusal.)
 
The one other ethical expectation is that new Justices do not Rule on Cases they have already had a piece of, either as a Lower Court Judge or Litigant. But even that is "Optional".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Ginsberg done just that?

Edit: I'm probably thinking about any liberal justice or maybe even their statements on a proposed case and just roling them into Ginsberg
 
Last edited:
Crossposting from the TDS thread since it's related to Kavanaugh. Regardless of what you think about Hannity, he was quite passionate during his segment that I feel needs to be heard. I don't remember the last time I heard anger in his voice, let alone the last time it's been stressed over and over again in such a short amount of time to go out and make your voices heard at the voting booths (from both sides, of course, especially during mid-terms).
 
Give it about 10 years. The Democrats are preforming so poorly that the US will be a one party state, even though the Greens and Libertarian are still a thing some how. Democrats will continue to lose seats in every possible political position from senator to city treasurer. When the country is pulled enough to the right on a normie level you'll see a lot of Supreme Court decisions reopened and reevaluated. Roe V Wade, gay marriage will be apart of a great judicial purge. Just give it time.

There's no longer a Fundamental (with a capital F) religious right strong enough force to dictate policy unilaterally. Most people are centrist and even if they don't agree with abortion, they generally favor restriction rather than full bans and what that brings with it, and that is not the hill any republican leader will lead the party to die on.

We're going to be legally kill babies for the greater good of everyone else for the forseeable future, don't you worry.

Serious talk, I'm not sure what conservative western Islam's view on the matter is. But unless they are very strongly against abortion, that is the only group that might contain a political core with enough will to try to do something about it.
edit: if they ever get the numbers for it, that is.

Ironically if Brown ever does get repealed or undermined, it'll be from the liberal side of the bench who will want to enshrine exclusionary safe-spaces for minorities.
 
Last edited:
Back