You guys ever heard of Joncomics? It's an AWFUL webcomic very similar in style and humor to cyanide and happyness, where you have ugly stick people trying to be offensive as possible. The punchline is always "lol violence" or "lol sex with " etc.
Realistically speaking, they're all painfully unfunny and edgy but it managed to get a cult following of people who love them for being "so bad its hilarious".
You guys ever heard of Joncomics? It's an AWFUL webcomic very similar in style and humor to cyanide and happyness, where you have ugly stick people trying to be offensive as possible. The punchline is always "lol violence" or "lol sex with " etc.
Realistically speaking, they're all painfully unfunny and edgy but it managed to get a cult following of people who love them for being "so bad its hilarious".
Devil's advocate here, what if the artist behind the comic is just working under furry social norms and assumes that there's nothing wrong with drawing young nude characters? Places like FA will have tons of ref sheets for youngish characters that depict them perfectly nude.
That's what I'm guessing is the gist here. It has an innocent-but-out-of-place vibe about it for an outsider. But, to furries, it's normal if not expected.
Rejected Princesses did a piece on Isabelle of France, who married Edward II of England. (And supposedly had him killed by shoving a red hot poker up his ass, although this is most likely an urban legend)
Do these idiots think there have never been gay royals in history, or that most royal marriages were for love, no matter WHAT your orientation was?
(I'm a HUGE royalty buff. So don't get me started)
it was also poorly drawn, Isabelle looks the same at any age, the panels repeat a lot in a poor attempt to create parallelism and Edward III looks exactly like Edward II
Rejected Princesses isn't bad, there's clearly some talent that goes into it. But the entire premise rubs me the wrong way a lot of the time. Some of the 'articles' always start off complaining about colonists censoring history, then treating the subject matter as if they beacons to the gods, fighting 'tooth and nail' against oppression before ending on how heroic they were - that or anything bad written about them is propaganda.
Seriously, it argues that Elizabeth Báthory was innocent because the artist couldn't find proof she killed. I guess she was just a victim of religious smear campaigns, obviously. Because women can't be serial killers.
Also shocked no one brought up that 50s comic about everyone being LGBT. Rock n Riot. http://rockandriotcomic.com/
Not the worst thing I've seen since the art is nice, but throwing modern tumblrism into the American 1950s makes for a really lazy and dull comic that borders on fetishing.
Rejected Princesses isn't bad, there's clearly some talent that goes into it. But the entire premise rubs me the wrong way a lot of the time. Some of the 'articles' always start off complaining about colonists censoring history, then treating the subject matter as if they beacons to the gods, fighting 'tooth and nail' against oppression before ending on how heroic they were - that or anything bad written about them is propaganda.
Seriously, it argues that Elizabeth Báthory was innocent because the artist couldn't find proof she killed. I guess she was just a victim of religious smear campaigns, obviously. Because women can't be serial killers.
Also shocked no one brought up that 50s comic about everyone being LGBT. Rock n Riot. http://rockandriotcomic.com/
Not the worst thing I've seen since the art is nice, but throwing modern tumblrism into the American 1950s makes for a really lazy and dull comic that borders on fetishing.
You weren't kidding about everyone being lgbt, holy shit. The comic was ok, kinda cute. It would have been better if it was a bit more realistic and less tumblr, though. Also that ending, they would have been arrested.
Rejected Princesses isn't bad, there's clearly some talent that goes into it. But the entire premise rubs me the wrong way a lot of the time. Some of the 'articles' always start off complaining about colonists censoring history, then treating the subject matter as if they beacons to the gods, fighting 'tooth and nail' against oppression before ending on how heroic they were - that or anything bad written about them is propaganda.
Seriously, it argues that Elizabeth Báthory was innocent because the artist couldn't find proof she killed. I guess she was just a victim of religious smear campaigns, obviously. Because women can't be serial killers.
Also shocked no one brought up that 50s comic about everyone being LGBT. Rock n Riot. http://rockandriotcomic.com/
Not the worst thing I've seen since the art is nice, but throwing modern tumblrism into the American 1950s makes for a really lazy and dull comic that borders on fetishing.
I forgot all about this and saw it being touted when it first came out. The cast page has no summary, not even a sentence, about who the characters are, but makes sure you know their pronouns and orientation.
I forgot all about this and saw it being touted when it first came out. The cast page has no summary, not even a sentence, about who the characters are, but makes sure you know their pronouns and orientation.
I think the only reason they set it in the 50's was just an excuse for them to wear greaser outfits.
There isn't even any discrimination or struggles they face. The comic is just each character coming out as not straight/cis and then they go to prom together.
I think the only reason they set it in the 50's was just an excuse for them to wear greaser outfits.
There isn't even any discrimination or struggles they face. The comic is just each character coming out as not straight/cis and then they go to prom together.
)
