It seems Jake was a regular contributor to "Gamespite", and was even listed as "staff", starting from Quarterly 4:
http://www.gamespite.net/toastywiki/index.php/Site/GSQ4TableOfContents
He's got an article or two in every issue from this point up to the end.
Most of his contributions are completely forgettable retrogame "reviews", such as this one for the original Super Mario Bros.:
http://www.gamespite.net/toastywiki/index.php/Games/G5-SuperMarioBros
If you're going to write an article about Super Mario Bros., surely the most exhaustively analyzed game of all time, at least have something original to say! Jake just recounts some of the novel features of the game, while engaging in his "asspulls as facts" style of exposition. For example:
Kind of a bizarre statement to make without any backing information. Sure, Mario started the platforming boom, but was it really at the expense of arcade gaming? Was it really "sudden"?
To take just one of many examples, what about shooters, the quintessential quarter-munching arcade games? Those were hugely popular and remained popular on home consoles.
Next up: "How RPGs Lost Their Way"
http://www.gamespite.net/toastywiki/index.php/Games/HowRPGSLostTheirWay
I challenge anyone to read this rambling recitation of "Features Of RPGs I Have Played" and come off with any coherent idea of how RPGs could be said to have lost their way.
EDIT:
On this particular topic I'd argue that the field isn't even mature enough yet that we have an academic debate and schools of thought worthy of the name.