Inactive Levi Dane Simmons / SnakeThing / Nelizar / Nelizar_Neli / Buttne - Furry zoosadism Telegram ringleader, necrophile, puppy rapist, nephew molester (NOW IN JAIL, PLED GUILTY!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  1. They claim to have been in contact with an officer who works at the Coos County jailhouse. The officer said Levi had been released but didn’t give a specific reason.
  2. Based on what the head officer for Levi’s case told them while they were handing over evidence, they think it could be a statute of limitations problem but have no confirmation yet.
  3. They claim they will have more information from the head officer later this week.
  4. The stream then devolves into standard furry degeneracy.

1. I'm not advocating they dox the guy, but they haven't exactly proven themselves trustworthy thus far and I'd say this claim is dubious at best.
2. This potential "statute of limitations" issue still makes no sense. In Oregon, sexual abuse of an animal is a C felony (ORS 167.333) and the other two violations he was charged with under ORS 167.320 and 167.330 are each either Class A misdemeanors or potentially, in combination with the violation of other laws, C felonies as well. ORS 131.125 §8 specifies felonies in Oregon have a statute of limitations of 3 years and misdemeanors 2. It seems improbable that there isn't any evidence to support the charges as the warrants would have required probable cause for search and seizure. Plus, it seems unlikely that a judge would to sign off on the warrants, unless there was some good faith evidence to support them. :optimistic: I know.
3. Sounds like an excuse to brush the whole situation under the rug while saving face for the sake of optics, "Well we never heard back from the officer, guess we'd better stop talking about this so the furry community's reputation isn't further tarnished."
 
Last edited:
If they have the motive and the Coos County Officer contact would they have tried to get him out by saying the evidence was super old?
 
cant someone just call the jail and ask what happened? say you're with the news

If you're ever going to make one of these calls (I did for Nick Bate) you don't have to explain anything and if you do go off on some big dumb explanation you'll be wasting your time and might even make them suspicious. Just call with the basic information, name, prisoner number if you have it, and ask if they're there, and if not, where they are.

They don't care if you claim to be a secret agent or a journalist or whatever, the information is either public or it isn't and they'll either tell you or they won't.

There is no reason to be cloak and dagger about it, it's just some person who sits there taking dumb calls and does not give a flying fuck why you're calling.
 
the biggest fear for me, if SnakeThing was released due to the statute of limitations, is the emboldening of these still very active zoosadists torturing, raping, and killing animals. make no mistake, it'll validate all of the "defenders" and create an environment where usage of the zeta symbol could be normalized or accepted as not a big deal.

(:_(

:feels: aside, i'm beginning to believe the "Furvenger" group might be a-logging. i can't find the paper right now, but the going estimate is 10% of all furries, roughly, identify as zoophiles or have zoophilic tendencies. it would not surprise me if some of that group were trying to feel like "morally superior zoophiles" by going after the zoosadists, similar to how this whole situation unraveled in the first place. the biggest tell, for me, is their urgency to confirm that the "Zoophile Blocklist" has absolutely no affiliation with them. why is this such a concern to a group dedicated to putting these people in prison?

it might be time to look deeper into the individual members of this group. it's very suspicious.
 
Betcha laws would change real quick if someone had a nice sitdown with lawmakers and Snakething's spank bank.

You just have to find a way to convince pollies to put the effort in. The bill made after the Mr Hands case in Washington State flew through with no nay votes because nobody wanted to be known as the guy who advocated for anal horse sex.
 
:feels: aside, i'm beginning to believe the "Furvenger" group might be a-logging. i can't find the paper right now, but the going estimate is 10% of all furries, roughly, identify as zoophiles or have zoophilic tendencies. it would not surprise me if some of that group were trying to feel like "morally superior zoophiles" by going after the zoosadists, similar to how this whole situation unraveled in the first place. the biggest tell, for me, is their urgency to confirm that the "Zoophile Blocklist" has absolutely no affiliation with them. why is this such a concern to a group dedicated to putting these people in prison?

it might be time to look deeper into the individual members of this group. it's very suspicious.
That's what I'm thinking. There's no good reason for the way they were acting in that stream. If it seemed like they were joking around because they were uncomfortable it wouldn't bother me, but they legitimately sounded like they weren't taking anything seriously. Maybe I'm reading too much into it but gut reactions are often pretty accurate.
 
According to Oregon Law, there are specific time limitations upon which legal action may be pursued. In the case of rape the time limit to press charges unless the victim was under the age of 18, in which the limitation to press charges increases until they turn 30 years of age. There are others stipulations found in the link in Sections 10, 11, and 12 such as what constitutes evidence of a crime.

In the case of animal cruelty, a class A misdemeanor, the limitations are two years after the crime unless mentioned elsewhere specifically in law. This makes animal cruelty 2 years by default.
 
:feels: aside, i'm beginning to believe the "Furvenger" group might be a-logging. i can't find the paper right now, but the going estimate is 10% of all furries, roughly, identify as zoophiles or have zoophilic tendencies. it would not surprise me if some of that group were trying to feel like "morally superior zoophiles" by going after the zoosadists, similar to how this whole situation unraveled in the first place. the biggest tell, for me, is their urgency to confirm that the "Zoophile Blocklist" has absolutely no affiliation with them. why is this such a concern to a group dedicated to putting these people in prison?

it might be time to look deeper into the individual members of this group. it's very suspicious.
I thought about this too. I would not use the Furvengers as a reliable source. This is the same group that wanted to take this thread down for "cyberbullying". This is also the same group that told everyone Levi skipped town when in reality he moved to a different a home.

In the case of animal cruelty, a class A misdemeanor, the limitations are two years after the crime unless mentioned elsewhere specifically in law. This makes animal cruelty 2 years by default.
The mom adopted a new dog in early September. Is there any mention of that in the logs? Does anyone remember seeing pictures of him? His name is Arrow if that helps.
upload_2018-10-31_13-13-15.png upload_2018-10-31_13-13-8.png
There's another dog named Bowser living at the house too but I can't find pictures of him. Would it be possible to test these dogs for rape? It would help with the charges against Levi but taking the dogs to get tested is probably a decision Levi's mom has to make.
 
The police likely don't have his PC or phone anymore. If he was released on the statue of limitations it would be illegal to continue holding onto his PC. Hopefully they're able to download information off of it, and can use that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NoFeline
Im still leaning that he was released on bond. Because if there wasnt enough to hold him im sure they wouldnt have wasted their time bringing him in. To arrest him the evidence has to be very strong. If it wasnt then he never would've went in the first place. I agree with the others who dont take the furvengers word as gold
 
Just scrolled through the "Furvengers" tag since I've been avoiding Twitter and it seems that group has a bunch of random new asspatting members now. I thought they just changed their name but apparently Furvengers is a new group Grizzly started (she's the same person that came here acting special and cryptic and spouting off about secret evidence they (the old group "ZSIS") had and whatnot and I think she got threadbanned.) There's police investigations going on because children are being molested and puppies are being tortured and raped and they're all running around Twitter with some special team hashtag and doing streams and podcasts now, lol.

I told them long before the "Furvengers" shit started that they're going over the top and left that group cause Grizzly has her head up her ass, guess they all managed to get even more autistic about it. If they're spreading misinformation about Levi's status it wouldn't surprise me since they don't know shit about the legal system and she jumped on being the one in touch with police to act like an authority on this shit and feed her hero complex (which seems to work, since she constantly gets praise for it.) She's apparently refusing to share new info with the original group after leaving, apparently she randomly backstabbed all the zoos they were getting information from. I heard she's always going off about how she's "doing this to protect her kids!" which is ironic if they're all getting hacked from parading about publicly and her FB seems to be on lockdown now.

Do with that what you will, I have no idea what she's doing at this point.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back