🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Streetlight Stranger said:
What you're not understanding is that they could've just removed his ability to super chat. Which they did. They then took down the stream. When no super chats were going. If that is the case then the super chats are not the issue for removal. And like others said Zidan immediately following with the complete removal (he doesn't use super chats) then clearly some other reason for removal needed to occur.
Click to expand...

How many times do I need to write that removing his superchats was not their goal, just their excuse for banning him? Is there something unclear with about that conceit? This is about Youtube controlling the perception of their moderation processes, not if their behavior was unethical or not. The perception is going to be that Youtube deleted Ralph because of what the major media publications are reporting, that his superchat and chat were breaking the rules of the website, which they can back up with apparent evidence in the form of screenshots and receipts, and then they deleted some other guy who tried to have him ban evade. Without superchats and post-/b/ behavior they would have no apparent evidence.
 
  • Autistic
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Oberspergfuhrer, Done, Jill Kews and 4 others
I wouldn't be surprised if they go after his patreon and paypal next. (And of course Warski's, you can't wash away your past with JFG buddy!)

What's our favorite convicted felon gonna do now? Is this the end of IBS?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnotherPleb
Yellow Yam Scam said:
How many times do I need to write that removing his superchats was not their goal, just their excuse for banning him? Is there something unclear with about that conceit? This is about Youtube controlling the perception of their moderation processes, not if their behavior was unethical or not. The perception is going to be that Youtube deleted Ralph because of what the major media publications are reporting, that his superchat and chat were breaking the rules of the website, which is they can back up with apparent evidence in the form of screenshots and receipts, and then they deleted some other guy who tried to have him ban evade. Without superchats and post-/b/ behavior they would have no apparent evidence.
Click to expand...
They didn't ban him for superchats, they banned him for 'tos violations' according to the WSJ article that probably actually talked to youtube, are you retarded?

Anonymousshitposter09 said:
I wouldn't be surprised if they go after his patreon and paypal next. (And of course Warski's, you can't wash away your past with JFG buddy!)

What's our favorite convicted felon gonna do now? Is this the end of IBS?
Click to expand...
They're gonna try to set up on their own, (good luck), and then their hosting is going to come under attack, next Stripe and Paypal are going to come under attack.

This shit is way bigger than some IBS shit, this is going to be used to surpress online speech.

Soon if you're going to be online, you're gonna have to build your own internet faggot, as well as your own banking system faggot, and if this orwellian self-imposed social credit system keeps being pushed we're all going to have to build our own EVERYTHING if we want to say anything that isn't authorized by the slave owning hooker murdering oligarchs that will be running our entire planet from SILICON FUCKING VALLEY because our government is too fucking pussy and cucked to do anything about it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: AnotherPleb, Clones of Alex Jones, Oberspergfuhrer and 1 other person
Sheryl Nome said:
They didn't ban him for superchats, they banned him for 'tos violations' according to the WSJ article that probably actually talked to youtube, are you exceptional?
Click to expand...

The terms of service are vague enough that not moderating your chat or reading inappropriate superchats is a ToS violation.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Done, Marvin, what0908 and 3 others
Yellow Yam Scam said:
The terms of service are vague enough that not moderating your chat or reading inappropriate superchats is a ToS violation.
Click to expand...
Which is fucking irrelevant because anyone with half a fucking brain knows that these ToS are worded such that Youtube, and basically any other site, can fuck you over for whatever reason they want. They hide behind it and use it as justification.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Clones of Alex Jones, Oberspergfuhrer and 19 others
garakfan69 said:
Originally it was to fuck with Sargon.

I hope Trump ends up tweeting about it. That would fulfill its original mission better than anyone ever dreamed of.
Click to expand...
They should've sent the money to the UK government if they wanted to fuck with Sargon. I'm sure we're all in agreement whether we admit it or not.

Baits aside, it's shit that Google trashed all of Ralph's accounts. Even if his google drive had stuff that had nothing to do with his streams. Wonder if he'll ever recover.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: not william stenchever, Ms. Cegination, Jill Kews and 2 others
What a shitful fucking article. An obscene amount of details and context were omitted, and the dumb cunt clearly has never watched a single episode if she doesn't understand how Ralph takes down and then reuploads each episode to the archive channel.

Oh, and $5 to anyone who can guess who the unnamed '''researcher''' mentioned in the article. If it isn't that hamplanet censorship fetishist who ragged out at Jim over his meming at dipstick reporters eager to question bloodsoaked survivors of a mass shooting then I'll be surprised.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnotherPleb, Dynamite Ninja, Oberspergfuhrer and 7 others
Sheryl Nome said:
They're gonna try to set up on their own, (good luck), and then their hosting is going to come under attack, next Stripe and Paypal are going to come under attack.

This shit is way bigger than some IBS shit, this is going to be used to surpress online speech.

Soon if you're going to be online, you're gonna have to build your own internet faggot, as well as your own banking system faggot, and if this orwellian self-imposed social credit system keeps being pushed we're all going to have to build our own EVERYTHING if we want to say anything that isn't authorized by the slave owning hooker murdering oligarchs that will be running our entire planet from SILICON FUCKING VALLEY because our government is too fucking pussy and cucked to do anything about it
Click to expand...
Nah they're private companies; they can do whatever they please.

boulderblundermatt said:
at this point, I hope the wall street journal continues to double, triple, and quadruple down.

because that would be the funniest goddamn thing to ever see happen. the salt from it would be absolutely glorious.
Click to expand...
This will all end in tears. I just know it.
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: NSA, Oberspergfuhrer, Dirt McGirt and 6 others
Marvin said:
The only way to really lose CDA 230 protections is if you wipe away the line between your users' content and your platform's content. And that has to be tied very finely to the content itself. Just deleting stuff doesn't qualify. You'd have to like, edit people's posts by hand and change the meaning of their post. And even then, you're allowed to do that, so long as you put in a little note like "edited by moderator: removed line about blah blah blah".

All acceptable under CDA 230. And while youtube are being shitheads with this, fucking with 230 is the Samson option. It would destroy us all, including this very site.
Click to expand...
What if you promote it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back