Richard Meyer v. Mark Waid (2018)

Waid Livestream - What will happen?

  • Talks about the lawsuit.

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Further incriminates himself.

    Votes: 18 48.6%
  • Defames YaBoi again.

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • Doesn't talk about the lawsuit nor CG.

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • Host disagrees with Waid on something, chimpout insues.

    Votes: 7 18.9%
  • Normal interview. (no drama)

    Votes: 2 5.4%

  • Total voters
    37
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey guys we should all just give MW a break, that Houston comic convention was just a one time thing and anyway no business occurred. MW hasn't done any other business in Texas at all...oh wait
upload_2018-11-4_8-57-15.png

http://markwaid.com/news/tx-–-mark-waid-signing http://archive.is/bXLQF
 
How does a lawyer of Zaids supposed caliber make such a rookie mistake? Isn't rule 1 for an attorney to check if what your idiot client says is factual before writing it down for the court? My dentist doesn't believe me when I tell him how much I floss! You would think a lawyer would have an even stronger bullshit detector. The consequences here are far worse then overlooking a cavity.

When I was working at [mumble mumble], there was a particular criminal defense outfit that would actually use their incompetence as a strategy. That is to say, when their patently guilty clients were convicted, they would file an ineffective assistance of counsel motion. On themselves. They would actually get up in court and say, "Judge, I was such a bad lawyer you can't find my client guilty, so he deserves a new trial." This went on for several years, if you can believe it, until the judges got sick of it and threatened to sanction and even charge contempt on any lawyer who tried this trick.

Is there a similar strategy in civil court?
 
alright im just catching up on the rackets stream, i'm only 3 minutes in and its already fire
Ok, Rackets.

Thank you for the detailed analysis. Upon the quality of this filing and his presumed contribution, I must wonder what contribution he made towards his ever famous Libya case. Maybe the guess that he rode off the coattails of others might be accurate.
@Ravenor You got any lawyer friends who would be willing to dig up some papers about that case?

Hey guys we should all just give MW a break, that Houston comic convention was just a one time thing and anyway no business occurred. MW hasn't done any other business in Texas at all...oh wait
View attachment 583542
http://markwaid.com/news/tx-–-mark-waid-signing http://archive.is/bXLQF
Money is exchanging hands so he cant say it isnt business.
 
There's no such defense. If your lawyer in a civil case fucks you with his malpractice, you have to sue him. So always make sure your lawyer in a civil case has good malpractice insurance.

Yeah, that's kinda what I figured. These people were true believers when it came to their clients -- the cops framed them, the prosecutors are all crooked, if they did it they were justified for some reason -- so any tactic was acceptable. It ironically led to them being some of the sleaziest operators I ever saw.

Maybe Zaid should send 'em a resume.
 
I'm listening to Rekieta's fiery stream about the Waid response currently ("and if you disingenuously attempt to misunderstand that, you deserve all the testicles you have gargled in your career, and all the sweat that has dripped onto your tonsils from it!"), and all this inclusion of tweets and anti-CG articles from the NPC press in the response has me thinking.

Back during GamerGate, the FBI announced they were looking into the gamer threat threat and then did absolutely nothing about it (except perhaps rolling their eyes), thus proving that GamerGaters weren't quite the terrorists that Law and Order and the press made them out to be. Meanwhile, Waid's attorneys want to include all of this stuff and make this a case about the sentiments of ComicsGaters rather than merely a business deal between two Texans. Okay, they can do that, but then if this thing goes to trial and Waid loses, then, in a way, the things ComicsGaters are saying will have been vindicated in a federal court.

Waid is literally making a federal case out of ComicsGate, and he's probably going to lose.

ETA: "Is she factually a Dumpster that receives cum?" :lit:

There's actually a bit more to it than that.

When GG happened, one of the biggest things that GG opponents tried to do - and this didn't last long - was report GG to the FBI in the hopes of cracking down on a consumer hashtag. A very amusing thing happened though: GG as a whole welcomed the investigation.

In the defense of the Anti-GGers on this one, it's not like there wasn't some actionable shit that happened during GG - it just so happened that basically everything that was remotely legally prosecutable involved with GG happened to be coming from third-party trolls. To use Wu a microcosm, the "Death to Brianna" Tweets happened came from SomethingAwful, the Crash Wu tweets came from SomethingAwful, and probably the funniest part of Wu in general happened when she tried to exploit fucking Jace (and yes, this led to the FBI paying Jan a visit). This is especially notable because there was an Anti-GGer attending the University of Washington who for fucking years has claimed GG had been involved with a homicide - a claim that's never been backed with even a single crumb of evidence - but of course, even with the FBI investigationg, nothing came of that, either.

When the FBI FOIA requests came out, not only was all of the above proven true (which was, admittedly, common knowledge in GG circles, but now had a fucking official FBI stamp of approval on 'em), but the response was.... Well:

BaHYWLB.png


Let's just say other than Brianna Wu (who claimed GG was a vast conspiracy to ruin her life and get Trump elected and that the FBI was in on it) and the deranged mental-patients she surrounds herself with (such as Fruszina Eordogh), every single Anti-GGer worth their salt shut the fuck up about Gamergate for a bit, and never, ever mentioned the FBI again if they could help it. Bringing it up, for all intents and purposes, is an instant loss for them, and a big reason they distanced themselves from it. This left the Antis in a weird position; while they can cheerfully parrot the same talking points they always have, they'll run the fuck away if anyone brings up the FBI FOIA requests, since the options for defending againt it are largely limited to accusing them of being either in on GG or incompetent, both of which undermine their bottom line.

If Waid really does go through the route he's been talking, this may very well cause a similar outcome, because while there's doubtlessly numerous saved tweets of comicsgaters being poopheads to mister Waid and his bestest friends, there's undeniably far more incidents of Waid and his buddies being histrionic shrieking retards.
 
This is exceptional beyond belief. Why the fuck would your opener in a court case be perjury? There's not even any point to it. He's lying about shit that doesn't even matter as he'd lose the jurisdiction issue even without this.

Am I mistaken in thinking that Zaid just also left a broad opening to D&C’s Lawyer to enter that very D&C video where he discovers and listens to Waid’s rantings at the Texas event into evidence? You know the nice video made at the time of the contract cancelation, where he wonderfully provides an explanation of damages as it happens. He goes through what the loss of publisher means, how it increases costs and limits sales etc. right there, within days of it happening. Without any grandstanding for Lawyers. That’s impressive.
 
Am I mistaken in thinking that Zaid just also left a broad opening to D&C’s Lawyer to enter that very D&C video where he discovers and listens to Waid’s rantings at the Texas event into evidence? You know the nice video made at the time of the contract cancelation, where he wonderfully provides an explanation of damages as it happens. He goes through what the loss of publisher means, how it increases costs and limits sales etc. right there, within days of it happening. Without any grandstanding for Lawyers. That’s impressive.

Maybe if they have an actual hearing on the jurisdiction issue, but it's not really relevant otherwise. The motion can be denied just based on what's already been submitted, and having huge hearings for every single thing is probably what Zaid wants to showboat and collect fat hourlies.

They need to get this past any immediate dispositive motions and get into discovery. Getting that fucking doughball prick Mark Waid under oath and in deposition is probably where this needs to go as quickly as possible, just so the lying cocksucker can commit more perjury.
 
Zaid is cracked in the head considering he tried to go after John Wilkes Booth (yes the guy who killed Lincoln) and tried to litigate over Kennedy too. From what I know he's not mentioned at all in the main Lockerbie trial which was done under Scottish law, a separate and notoriously finnicky system of law in Scotland which dusts off ridiculous ancient laws on whims.

Tldr is he's an idiotic gloryhound that got puntedpup the totem for his help landing his firm the motherof all paydays with the comisdion off of the $2.7bn he got. He regularly chases ghosts and any fucking stupid whatterboutery is going to be him looking for the next thing he can boast about on network news while the "lesser" lawyers do the actual heavy lifting.
 
Zaid is cracked in the head considering he tried to go after John Wilkes Booth (yes the guy who killed Lincoln) and tried to litigate over Kennedy too. From what I know he's not mentioned at all in the main Lockerbie trial which was done under Scottish law, a separate and notoriously finnicky system of law in Scotland which dusts off ridiculous ancient laws on whims.

Tldr is he's an idiotic gloryhound that got puntedpup the totem for his help landing his firm the motherof all paydays with the comisdion off of the $2.7bn he got. He regularly chases ghosts and any fucking stupid whatterboutery is going to be him looking for the next thing he can boast about on network news while the "lesser" lawyers do the actual heavy lifting.
So when I previously said that Michael Mansfield and the other Brit QCs did the heavy lifting in the Libya case, which he then stole glory from, that was pretty much correct.

If he really was as great as he claims, he wouldn't be chasing ghosts and suing on behalf of falsified papers saying that Princess Diana was going to marry some Arab billionaire and was offed because of it

Still not sure who is funnier. Landau, a no name who is a complete huckster and failure of a lawyer, or someone who is a alleged Superlawyer, winner of awards, being this incompetent?
 
Last edited:
So when

So when I previously said that Michael Mansfield and the other Brit QCs did the heavy lifting in the Libya case, which he then stole glory from, that was pretty much correct.

If he really was as great as he claims, he wouldn't be chasing ghosts and suing on behalf of falsified papers saying that Princess Diana was going to marry some Arab billionaire and was offed because of it

Still not sure who is funnier. Landau, a no name who is a complete huckster and failure of a lawyer, or someone who is a alleged Superlawyer, winner of awards, being this incompetent?

Fame rarely equals competency. I begin to suspect that Zaid likely is more than a bit of a Sociopath. One of those who goes through life and career flinging lies and slander largely because the normies never ever seem to hold anyone actually accountable for doing so.
 
If he really was as great as he claims, he wouldn't be chasing ghosts and suing on behalf of falsified papers saying that Princess Diana was going to marry some Arab billionaire and was offed because of it
Oh wow, I had no idea Zaid was part of Mohamed Al-Fayed's lawsuit. That is low, low, low.
For those who hadn't heard of it: this billionaire was the father of Princess Diana's boyfriend who died in the car crash with her. One way or another, the senior Al-Fayed got it into his head that the whole thing was a conspiracy between all the top American and British spy agencies to assassinate the two of them because some highly placed royals couldn't stand the thought of a Muslim marrying into the royal family. He made a huge fuss about it in the media and sued various governmental agencies, and apparently Mark Zaid was right there enabling his grief-fueled conspiracy theories for a few years.
 
:story: Zaid keeps getting into slapfights:
https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/1058827336945205248 https://archive.fo/Qi6t5
831A518D-2E2A-4C41-A62A-2A70E6BD3535.jpeg

FFF2C879-FE57-4DBB-9A5E-8A00677F359B.jpeg

As Nicky said, let Meyer’s laywer point it out. I would recommend using a stick instead of a laser pointer, Zaid’s conspiracy autism would kick in and think there are snipers after him:
https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/1058842715763474433 https://archive.fo/DV1q4
D607458C-A8C7-4200-B034-4BFAE8089054.jpeg

Ren of course helped YaBoi again by proving he was there, btw what did you have him sign?
https://twitter.com/renfamous/status/1058840561598283777 https://archive.fo/GTLcq
369CAEDF-289E-4389-A010-82E32DF06EF1.jpeg

Did it happen to be a book Mark Waid worked on?
upload_2018-11-4_2-21-4.png

He got really mad at some random guy doing his job for him while buying wings at Costco:
https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/1058842937524699136 https://archive.fo/Db5uJ
90127A71-586F-45A9-82B7-41356077BFC9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I think it's kind of stupid for all these people to be posting all the problems with his case directly at him on twitter where they know he'll see it. Let him think he's got this in the bag right up until the moment he gets blown the fuck out in court, then mock him off the internet. That would be way funnier.

Also, Wegmans deserves so much better than Zaid's endorsement, I feel so bad for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back