🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://archive.is/0i7i9
upload_2018-11-10_17-54-33.png

Well then. I thought sargon was bullshitting lol
 
I don't know why anyone expects consistency or civility from any of these people, least of all a drunk ex con fresh out of jail for fighting with cops. It's digital bumfights, not a highbrow debate show.
 
Why the fuck is he using the UKIP account?

A better question is why is UKIP letting him use a UKIP account for his Internet slap fight.

If anyone asks them they should say it's nothing to do with them.

I still like the Killstream though. Listening to CRP, Dame Pesos and Zidane mock each other and CRP and Pesos and call El Salvadorians 'subhumans' because Ralph said he enjoyed lunch in an Salvadorean restaurant is ironically an example of a functional multiracial group of buddies.

All those sanctimonious cunts flagging him because the superchat is full of racist jokes could learn a lot from it - people are different and the way you deal with those differences is by humour. Once you start banning that or self censoring yourself, you've lost part of what it is to be human. You've also made real inter ethnic conflict a whole lot more likely.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why anyone expects consistency or civility from any of these people, least of all a drunk ex con fresh out of jail for fighting with cops. It's digital bumfights, not a highbrow debate show.

Probably because it's becoming a routine especially this week alone. It pretty much has devolved to patently stupid posturing.
 
http://archive.is/0i7i9
View attachment 589371
Well then. I thought sargon was bullshitting lol
There's been a few instances of Ralph interfering with Sargon's UKIP and the BBC activities by essentially pulling the same kind of shit while live on the KillStream, including not so subtly encouraging his audience to do the same. It really is quite hypocritical for Ralph to be upset at Sargon for tweeting at the Wall Street Journal, but his chimpout over it is entertaining nonetheless.
 
There's been a few instances of Ralph interfering with Sargon's UKIP and the BBC activities by essentially pulling the same kind of shit while live on the KillStream, including not so subtly encouraging his audience to do the same. It really is quite hypocritical for Ralph to be upset at Sargon for tweeting at the Wall Street Journal, but his chimpout over it is entertaining nonetheless.

It's *somewhat* hypocritical, but not very.

These are very different circumstances you have to remember. Sargon has nil chance of having a successful political career, due in large past because of the 50 different soundbites that can be used against him. He is a non starter and would damage any serious platform and group he attaches himself to. That's BEFORE even considering his modus operandi of latching on to something then trying to change it to suit his means. Something he EXPLICITLY stated he wanted to do to UKIP. Ralph, Jim and co point this out to him, he doesn't recognise any of their criticisms and just says he can 'disavow everything' and that it will all be right.

Sargon is halfheartedly trying to platform people because he thinks they are meanie pants, and being a meanie pants is now a valid reason to deplatform people. Ralph and Jim and all the rest didn't try to deplatform him, they just tried to get him the fuck away from a legit political movement because he's going to damage it, and he's too much of a smug arsehole to care.

Are they interfering in Sargon's affairs, sure. But the situations are barely comparable.
 
I said it before and I'll say it again. There is no comparison between bothering UKIP/Batten over stupid crap Carl has said (which people were going to probably do anyway) and reporting someone to the WSJ, YouTube, or the freaking FBI over their YouTube videos. The worse that will happen in the former case is Carl is booted from UKIP (which everyone knows he doesn't give a crap about anyway) while the latter can face getting de-platformed and pretty much publicly tainted.

The only thing either of those have in common is just being petty bullcrap. That's it.
 
This is a pretty fucking terrible stream so far. Bad enough he didn't even think to let his fans know when or even if he was streaming today, (I get Warski is the one who flaked, but it was shitty of ralph to not even tweet about it) now he's playing a 20 minute rant video of some retard screaming about millineals. Not gonna lie, I think I'm gonna turn this shit off.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mapo Tofu
A better question is why is UKIP letting him use a UKIP account for his Internet slap fight.

They helped him evade an IP or device ban, so they're stuck in a position where they can't admit it's Carl... which also means they can't discipline him for any stupid shit he does since they have to deny it's even him. Odd that such cunning strategists would hitch their wagon to someone who can't even muster up the motivation to yell at stupid news articles for an hour once a week
 
This is a pretty fucking terrible stream so far. Bad enough he didn't even think to let his fans know when or even if he was streaming today, (I get Warski is the one who flaked, but it was shitty of ralph to not even tweet about it) now he's playing a 20 minute rant video of some exceptional individual screaming about millineals. Not gonna lie, I think I'm gonna turn this shit off.
:ghost::woo::hah::cans::cans::cans::cans::cans::cans::cans::noticeme::hambone::bluelabel:
What you didn't enjoy re-hashed Ghost?

I'm not shocked the cokehead flaked. He has the IQ of a waterlogged surfboard.
 
Pretty sure that even if the entire internet disabled their ad blockers, Ralph would still make more from a single night of streaming than a year's worth of web ad revenue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back