Greta Gustava Martela / Kjel Anderson & Nina Chaubal / Niraj Chaubal - Stole $350k+ from Trans Lifeline, kill count of 2+ from negligence, Founders of Sisterwood/La Zorra.

They don't think about "and then what". They don't consider it their responsibility to have the answer to that question. They want to burn shit to the ground and leave the problem of what happens next to someone else.

It's a bit of a window into how people like Greta and Nina gain influence. They don't have any viable answers either but they're still several steps ahead of the rest by virtue of having a shipping container in the desert.

It’s just jealously. They don’t want their property taxed, they want people who own property in the cities they covet to pay higher taxes which they think will benefit them in some manner and help them afford to live their on the cheap.

One thing I’ve noticed about our rat king members is almost none of them actually pay taxes, they just want free shit and feel they are entitled to it. They don’t pay taxes they just want it to benefit from the taxes other ppl pay.
 
They don't think about "and then what". They don't consider it their responsibility to have the answer to that question. They want to burn shit to the ground and leave the problem of what happens next to someone else.

It's a bit of a window into how people like Greta and Nina gain influence. They don't have any viable answers either but they're still several steps ahead of the rest by virtue of having a shipping container in the desert.
Definitely. Greta’s ranting hits that sweet spot between fantasy and reality. How will we cope with the oncoming troon holocaust? We have a compound in the desert! I’ll train you up as an army! Troons are typically irresponsible and lazy, so they’re happy to let someone who appears to know what they’re doing if you don’t think too hard about it take charge.
 
Do these idiots realize if you raise taxes and subsequently set limits on rent that landlords won’t have money to fix properties or pay the exorbitant taxes and utilities? Then what, they expect the system to crash and there won’t be property laws? Everyone will live rent free and happy wherever they feel like?

I realize trannies don’t understand logic or have rational thoughts but rent is high in California due to the taxes. Everything is expensive as shit because of taxes.


Kjel and Pajeet aren't exactly wrong, but not for the reasons they think they are.
:offtopic: a bit, but bear with me

Let me start out with this quote
"Rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city — except for bombing." - Carl Lindbeck, economist

Now, housing prices in California are high for three reasons:
Firstly, the climate. The stable generally sunny weather without being a full-on desert is great for a lot of things, movies & argiculture. Its also near the coast. Even without the following two factors, property in California would demand a premium - not anything near the completely stupid levels you see currently, but a premium.

Second, Chinese wealth hiding. As was explained to me, in China you don't just pay a tax on income, you also pay a tax on all assets. So the usual thing to do is to buy property outside of China, fudge the value or transfer it to a US citizen relative, and dodge the tax. California was a natural stop for chinese due to the chinese community. Same shit is happening in Vancoover too.

Third is the "Cash upfront" feedback loop. Thanks to Hollywood, the number of retards who find themselves suddenly wealthy and go pay asking price for a house with cash was always high. This just got really started when the tech revolution in the 70's started, and went to fucking 11 12 when the Dotcoms happened and people could just buy whatever. Dotcoms, to attract and keep talent, also vastly inflated salaries which started a rent feedback loop.

There is a 4th factor that is unique to the bay area, that ties to the 3rd, which is the "boom town" effect. Or more specifically, even into the 2000's, anything south of Frisco was still low-density single family 1/8th acre housing, mostly from the 30s. Thanks to environmental red tape and general NIMBY attitudes, development of higher density housing has seriously lagged.

There is also a hidden 5th factor: Rent is high because property taxes are low. Or more specifically, state law caps combined local & county property tax at 1.3%, and caps year-to-year tax valuation increases at 2%; it doesn't get reset until the property is sold. So as a landlord, as long as you take over properties that are currently turning a profit (or will be turning a profit once the tax valuation is reset), they will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. There will be no suprise 200% tax increases because your neighborhood is the hot new gentrification spot, its a safe investment.

tl;dr - housing prices are insane because of a feedback loop that drives up wages which drives up prices which drives up wages which....


Cities with rent control on the books DO allow for 'passthrough costs'. You can raise rent to account for tax increases. You can raise rent if utilities go up. You can raise rent if there are major repairs that need done to a building. The problem is these are all done after the fact, and your tenants can still fight you before the Rental Board, which is essentially a court with binding decisions staffed by unelected appointees. They favor (in this order) Large politically connected landlords, Renters (That is, council members' voting constituents), and finally small landlords.

tl;dr In theory you can pass long business cost increases (taxes, utilities, wear and tear) but it can be an ardous process.

The dickless twosome aren't thinking of any of that. They just want to make sure they can't be evicted no matter how disgustingly slovenly they are, and that their rent won't change.


It’s just jealously. They don’t want their property taxed, they want people who own property in the cities they covet to pay higher taxes which they think will benefit them in some manner and help them afford to live their on the cheap.

One thing I’ve noticed about our rat king members is almost none of them actually pay taxes, they just want free shit and feel they are entitled to it. They don’t pay taxes they just want it to benefit from the taxes other ppl pay.

I'm more and more of the opinion that people won't pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to have a say in how taxes are spent.
 
Rent control fucks over anyone who hasn't already secured a rental contract before the law comes into effect. It's a great political trap because the people it fucks over can't vote against it—they're not residents yet. Kjel and Pajeet are hardly the only ones to fall into this trap. Rent control is unreasonably popular.

Housing prices are insane not mainly because of taxes or rent control, but because another initially pro-incumbent policy of restrictive zoning and construction permits makes it impossible to build enough new housing to match or even exceed population growth. Rent control just makes this demand-driven spiral of soaring prices slightly worse—if housing prices were to depreciate instead, rent control would not have impact.

Also, higher property taxes would depress housing prices: properties would become strictly worse investments the more they cost to maintain. Another big contributor to California's fucked housing prices is Proposition 13, which greatly discounts the property taxes of anyone who bought the property for cheap decades ago. Waiting for property prices to appreciate is extremely incentivised as it costs barely anything.
 
TL;DR People in California are shit, California's laws are shit and the state is the poster child for why single party super-majority control over a legislature for extended periods of time is a fucking awful idea.

Prop 13 really isn't that big an issue in the grand scheme of things. The biggest issue is that there is a massive 3.5 million housing unit shortfall in California. This shortfall is stems from two primary factors. The first is that there is a deeply ingrained NIMBY attitude that is endemic to California's populace and local governments. In my experience at least, Californians tend to be much more aggressive in resisting the construction of affordable housing than elsewhere in the United States. Sure, everyone wants those poor people and working class families to have housing but; they don't want it anywhere where they might happen to accidentally see any of the people that would live in those communities. Additionally, local governments will generally ignore California laws which require them to submit, and follow through on, long term housing development plans. Strangely too, Californians seem to have an aversion to building upwards (e.g. multistory apartment buildings.)

The second factor is California's regulatory bloat and legislative incompetence. At the state level, California's regulatory burden is already extremely cumbersome and is uniformly unfriendly to anyone looking to build housing in the state. Indeed, state law ends up, on average, increasing the cost of housing by $22,000 compared to $6000 nationally. However, compounding issue, local governments also will impose heavy reporting burdens, capriciously levee steep impact fees, make the permitting process long and complicated as humanly possible, reserve the right to veto a development as "not fitting in with the established community or aesthetic" later in the building process etc. The regulatory assfucking to developers in California receive ensure that the cost of housing is driven up. As an added bonus, the restrictions also mean that any development will proceed at a snail's pace, which will further increase the front end expenses to builders which will, inevitably be passed on to buyers and/or renters. Additionally, the legislature's (I'm going to be generous and ascribe incompetence to their motivations, rather than corruption,) asinine response has been to throw money at the problem, in the form of state subsided housing. Oh, and any of these subsided construction contracts must be done by union workers at prevailing wage. This is fucking retarded I'd say that its only treating the symptoms of the problem, rather than the source (see: local governments being cunts,) but it doesn't even do that much, as the local governments fight tooth and nail against these projects. Which, wouldn't you know it, happens to drive up the cost of building the housing and makes attempts to build the housing extremely unattractive.
 
Rent control fucks over anyone who hasn't already secured a rental contract before the law comes into effect.

It also fucks over people who have a rental contract, as after 5-10 years when it would normally time to upgrade to a better apartment, you will discover you can't afford the 300+% hike in rent on a comparable place (since the 'market rate' is now priced so that the rent you pay when you move in has to be profitable in 30 years), so you're stuck living in your shitty post-grad efficiency until you get a job outside of the area.
 
Anonymous field operative dead dropped me an album of pictures from Sisterwood. It's a literal dump.

1 - nPb326J.jpg 2 - dLnBS3v.jpg 3 - yNXLsII.jpg 4 - 0fIX8Yi.jpg 5 - b1oh8HE.jpg 6 - dURkj4j.jpg 7 - iZTHWd8.jpg 8 - SkFye19.jpg 9 - 4kywLku.jpg 10 - xe5xfCa.jpg 11 - cuD7bbt.jpg 12 - c3yt9rl.jpg 13 - Vu8sRYJ.jpg 14 - q0feLcR.jpg 15 - JYxTvlt.jpg 16 - 2J5VzwS.jpg 17 - LFxk1Ts.jpg 18 - sRd2PTR.jpg 19 - CIIsEF9.jpg 20 - 1pTe5u8.jpg 21 - q3jP0XC.jpg 22 - Ju74pZ4.jpg 23 - sk3rZNO.jpg 24 - ZXf5S1o.jpg 25 - obfB8fr.jpg 26 - KRMgsOr.jpg 27 - CSZeNxs.jpg 28 - KMRpZoN.jpg 29 - 6nwYD7o.jpg 30 - BDbXJRc.jpg 31 - dweZXNl.jpg
 
I love that full ketchup bottle just lying on the goddamn ground :lol:
Was Sisterwood "inhabited" at the time or did someone just trek out there and find it like that? It could honestly go either way in my mind.

EDIT: no wait, the best is the toothbrush on the ground!
https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/7-izthwd8-jpg.591659/
This is like a Where's Waldo of household items :lol:
 
Even people like Joe Arpaio and militiamen on the border would say "wait a second... we need to do better than this" if prisons or illegal immigration detention facilities looked like that.

I'm pretty sure concentration camps had better facilities than this (don't mention the showers though).
 
Back