- Joined
- Mar 4, 2016
Those trolls are just the worst. What are they getting from it except a whole lot of laughs?You do realize that 3rd party trolls exist right? Like people who like to troll both sides and pit them against each other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those trolls are just the worst. What are they getting from it except a whole lot of laughs?You do realize that 3rd party trolls exist right? Like people who like to troll both sides and pit them against each other.
Some random dude tagging in Sargon with his Twitter action report is not "proof". You really can't compare this to Krau having an entire doxing server leaked or whatever Mundane Matt was doing.The last time 3rd party trolls were brought up, it was Fatt Jarbo trying to cover his ass, only to get exposed on livestream as a massive flaggot. I do understand that trolls would want to incite the two of them for their own sick kicks, but after Jihadi Jarbo's jihad was officially exposed, and not to mention people in Sargon's circle, like Kraut and Piss being exposed as running ops on Discord 'n shit, it's certainly not a good look for Sargon or his people.
I'm not saying he is the new Sargon, I'm saying this thread is slowly becoming the new Sargon thread: Initial whiteknighting, then a slow but sure realization that he indeed was a cow all along.Jim isn't a Lolcow though. I doubt he ever will be either. Saying Jim will be the new Sargon is laughable honestly. If Jim had to personality to do that it would have happened years ago.
Oh I think they're doing a splendid job, I was just reminding people that they exist in the 1st place.Those trolls are just the worst. What are they getting from it except a whole lot of laughs?
Jim interviewed by Milo.Right, i supported GG initially due to how i was against the es jay dubyas and their media pals trying to dictate what is and isn't acceptable game content via social media lynch mobs, not "ethics in video game journalism" (which causes me physical pain whenever i hear it). I never gave a rat's ass about Zoe Quinn sucking dick to get coverage for her shitty CYOA or the incestuous relationship between journos and AAA devs. "Games Journalism" has always been a complete joke of an industry anyhow.
IMO the main threat is Jim going after them and being so personally invested in their downfall. He still has the ability to make good content but if all he's doing is yelling at vee on twitter and doing "goodbye carl #364" streams he doesn't have time to make said content.Point is that all of them are fags tbh. Let's be real here. Mundaneshill is done, Kraut will never be trusted by anyone, sargon is a laughing stock. What's the actual threat? They all destroyed themselves, and they can swing as much as they want but the fight's already over. They lost and like always they're losers until the very end. Nothing will ever change that. And once everyone does move on they'll disappear.Hell if Jim would just stop reacting to them they'd go nuts because no one is paying attention to them.
Fully agreed.IMO the main threat is Jim going after them and being so personally invested in their downfall. He still has the ability to make good content but if all he's doing is yelling at vee on twitter and doing "goodbye carl #364" streams he doesn't have time to make said content.
Dear leader did a stream on Couch Cuck.I want to hear about this couch cuck person without having to sort through a thread to get the good details. I don't want yet another killstream recap stream.
I think for now the skeptics are kinda dry, like initially it was funny because Sargon is a cow that honestly needed to be called out for a while now. But now it's becoming very deeply autistic and "inside baseball" for most people. And as a result, he is now becoming part of the content himself, as evidenced by this thread's move to a "content" sub from an off-topic section.And I'm not denying that there's potential good content with the skeptics, but the more he gets obsessed with burying them, the more he's been making a big deal out of relatively minor things, and that takes the fun out of it.
His whole "I don't care if I get covered in shit if I can drag you down with me" strategy is just moronic, and he seems to have committed to it. Its ironic too because the skeptics are already in the shit, and all they really want is to drag Jim down with them. (as you can see by vee's gay op, which was basically him begging for retweets on a hentia discord to prove jim wrong about how easily information travels to youtubers)
I think this is the kind of situation where being dependent on Superchats acts against Jim. Even if he pledges to refocus on actual content, you know that people will be tipping money to continually ask him about Skeptic drama, which would probably make it hard to focus on fulfilling said pledge.Honestly the best hope is that Jim's 1 week twitter suspension gives him time to reflect and realize how gay he's acting as of late.
That Blindfurry guy who reported Jim isn't some random 3rd party troll. He's a skeptic fan.Some random dude tagging in Sargon with his Twitter action report is not "proof".
If he was dependent on them, he would stream on every opportunity he has, but he didn't.I think this is the kind of situation where being dependent on Superchats acts against Jim.
I think Jim was clearly on the "ethics in games journalism" train. I even recall a really pathetic line in one of his videos where he said that we need to sort out games journalism if we're ever going to fix the rest of journalism (FFS).
IMO the main threat is Jim going after them and being so personally invested in their downfall. He still has the ability to make good content but if all he's doing is yelling at vee on twitter and doing "goodbye carl #364" streams he doesn't have time to make said content.
I want to hear about this couch cuck person without having to sort through a thread to get the good details. I don't want yet another killstream recap stream.
And I'm not denying that there's potential good content with the skeptics, but the more he gets obsessed with burying them, the more he's been making a big deal out of relatively minor things, and that takes the fun out of it.
His whole "I don't care if I get covered in shit if I can drag you down with me" strategy is just moronic, and he seems to have committed to it. Its ironic too because the skeptics are already in the shit, and all they really want is to drag Jim down with them. (as you can see by vee's gay op, which was basically him begging for retweets on a hentia discord to prove jim wrong about how easily information travels to youtubers)
Honestly the best hope is that Jim's 1 week twitter suspension gives him time to reflect and realize how gay he's acting as of late.
Considering he had pre-gamergate videos about journalism and internet, including the related ethics, it wouldn't surprise me if he was the progenitor of the idea. The ground zero for gamergate to grow from random internet spergfest to something that is internationally reported on, was after all the result of the attention on his video that was tweeted by Baldwin.
In this video he called on people to focus on the journalists.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Yeah, I think thats part of the issue with Jim getting so invested in this, he feels the need to respond to every personal attack they do, instead of letting them trip over themselves and only bringing it up once there's a wealth of new content.I think for now the skeptics are kinda dry, like initially it was funny because Sargon is a cow that honestly needed to be called out for a while now. But now it's becoming very deeply autistic and "inside baseball" for most people. And as a result, he is now becoming part of the content himself, as evidenced by this thread's move to a "content" sub from an off-topic section.
Sometimes you have to let the cows roam the pastures a bit so they build-up content.
I agree. Honestly I think he should switch he patreon to per video instead of per month, it would financially encourage him just as much to make videos and might help mitigate his recent habit of just doing recap/skeptic streams.I think this is the kind of situation where being dependent on Superchats acts against Jim. Even if he pledges to refocus on actual content, you know that people will be tipping money to continually ask him about Skeptic drama, which would probably make it hard to focus on fulfilling said pledge.
On a serious note I'm not sure how much Gamer Gate was "ruined" or how much it was based on a nebulous premise that it was prone to be inevitably hijacked by certain actors for their own purposes.And even youtubers like Angry Joe would have been tossed out for defending Anita.
But yeah if GamerGate hadn't been ruined by those imbeciles we might not have the shit we do now with all the pro-Antifa propaganda being put in games now or dudes like Neil Druckmann forcing diversity into everything.
On a serious note I'm not sure how much Gamer Gate was "ruined" or how much it was based on a nebulous premise that it was prone to be inevitably hijacked by certain actors for their own purposes.
What the fuck is this shit some tards keep tarding about Jim starting gamergate? Where the fuck do people get that idea?
Alex and I were still huddled together in the elevator shaft, overstaying our welcome with our incredibly gracious and increasingly horrified hosts, when we started getting notifications with the same link popping up again and again. The link went to the YouTube account of a guy who presented himself as a blue skull. His video consisted of him ranting about how I had obviously slept with someone for good reviews, since one of the "five guys" from The Ex's manifesto was a writer for the gaming site Kotaku. There was no proof of this supposed illegitimately obtained review, just repetition of the Manifesto's accusations mixed with such conspiratorial conjecture that it would make someone wearing a tinfoil hat instantly sprout another, tinier tinfoil hat on top of it.
I had no idea who this person was or why this link was suddenly attached to the horrible things people were sending to me. A tour through his channel revealed videos of him "weighing in" on various current events, with a particular interest in shitting on marginalized people.
This video went down, and then another one sprang up --- this time with a higher production value and featuring a talking head whose logo was a stock photo of a smarmy guy with a crudely Photoshopped powered wig. All this user's videos were similar spittle-laden diatribes about individuals he didn't like.
Powered Wig Man-(*) created an elabotare intro that spoofed true-crime shows, with a voice-over yelling about sex for favors. Between him and Little Blue Skull Guy on YouTube, the wave of trash sent my way surged as their audiences followed wherever they pointed the finger, pitchforks and torches in hand. I was the witch of the week, and these self-styled Internet Inquisitors saw the opportunity to do what they had done to many others before me.
(*) I don't want to publicize these channels and help disseminate their garbage (remember: content-neutral algorithms), so I'll refer to them by silly names based on their personas instead. They've already made enough of a career off me.