Disaster Twitter bans misgendering and deadnaming in pro-trans move - The troon ride never ends

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/11/23/twitter-misgendering-deadnaming-trans/
Twitter has prohibited misgendering and deadnaming on its platform in an effort to curtail anti-trans abuse.

The social media company has changed its rules to ban the practices and has warned that any user who deliberately targets a trans person in these ways may face permanent suspension.

These offensive techniques—which involve using the wrong gender to refer to a trans person or a trans person’s old name—are often used on Twitter to insult and erase trans people’s identities and right to exist.

In Twitter’s updated terms of service, the company states: “We prohibit targeting individuals with repeated slurs, tropes or other content that intends to dehumanise, degrade or reinforce negative or harmful stereotypes about a protected category.

“This includes targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

The move, which was made in late October but only broadly noticed on the platform on Friday (November 23), also involved adding a section in which Twitter acknowledges that LGBT+ people suffer abuse online more than most.

“We recognise that if people experience abuse on Twitter, it can jeopardise their ability to express themselves,” the paragraph begins.

“Research has shown that some groups of people are disproportionately targeted with abuse online.

“This includes; women, people of colour, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, marginalised and historically underrepresented communities,” it continues.

“For those who identity [sic] with multiple underrepresented groups, abuse may be more common, more severe in nature and have a higher impact on those targeted.”

The social media giant has also created a new section of its terms of service, called “Consequences,” in which explains the actions it is pledging to take against offenders.

Twitter has promised to permanently suspend any account which either breaks the rules too many times or is “engaging primarily in abusive behaviour.”

Users who are “deemed to have shared a violent threat” will also be banned from the platform, the company has stated.

Many Twitter users have praised the change, which they hope will lead to more abusive accounts being suspended or banned completely.

One tweeted: “nb deadnaming and misgendering are now prohibited on Twitter. which is very good news!”

Another said: “Excellent news everyone: Twitter has finally updated their TOS such that misgendering/deadnaming a trans person is against the site’s rules. Happy hunting.”

“I was skeptical (because it’s twitter) but yeah, the TOS is pretty clear. Repeated misgendering and/or deadnaming is specifically listed. Excellent,” tweeted yet another fan of the policy shift.

However, there was also hesitancy from many who doubted that the changes in Twitter’s terms of service would be enforced when abusive users were reported.

One such user wrote: “Good start. We’ll have to see if reporting is meaningful or the policy enforced.”

Another tweeted: “like they’ll ever enforce it seriously.”

And a different user commented: “apparently twitter updated its rules to specify that targeted deadnaming and misgendering of trans people isnt allowed but im calling it now that they wont enforce this rule.”
Somebody ought to tell Jack that 1984 wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual
 
gotta be honest, i dont see the problem from twitters standpoint, and if i ran twitter, i would probably ban a lot of the people deadnaming, too. not because of personal philosophy, but it makes more sense from a business standpoint.

Appealing to an extreme minority of people at the expense of a regular person when it comes to customers doesn't make a lick of sense to me, unless I'm missing something.

Aaaaand Twitter is finally dead. This will make troons more hated than ever.

Nah. Twitter's not going to die any time soon simply because of the age-old problem that laziness and "sticking with the devil you know" go hand-in-hand. People would rather get frustrated with and continue using a service that clearly doesn't want them there instead of trying to build up a following or whatever on a different service.

Thread simulator:

That meme really only works when the NPC's are espousing opinions that are in-line with the establishment (for want of a better word).
 
> troon complains that you deadnamed them
> in their complaint to jack, they deadname themselves
> troon gets banned by twitter
maybe this will save twitter

Lol one of our trannies complained to Google that being deadnamed was libelled by my thread on him. In their report the tranny's trannyname (Heather) is redacted, and the deadname (Warren James) is left in https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/16391785
 
Good. Twitter’s rules just make it easier to get the ones who wanted them banned.
You can easily get accounts banned or suspended just by reporting their violent rhetoric about TERFs. They won’t even blame us, every time it happens they blame the TERFs for it. Or just search for any tweet with kill, stab, shoot, punch, murder, etc. and report them. It doesn’t even have to contextually make sense as a threat because no one at twitter is manually moderating.
This no dead naming rule isn’t going to do anything because it would involve manual moderation. They can’t even remove a blue checkmark’s dox in under 48 hours.
 
There's no category of name-changers that's protected in any way other than this. I mean, when you change your name, in many places you have to put a notice in the newspaper--it's public record, and to make sure you're not defrauding anyone.

Saying Charlie Sheen's birth name is Carlos Estevez is fine. Saying Mitch McConnell's actual first name is Addison is fine. Saying Mohammed Ali was born Cassius Clay is fine. Saying Hillary Clinton's birth surname was Rodham, and her husband's birth surname was Blythe, is fine. We acknowledge that sometimes people change their names because they get married, or are adopted, or convert to another religion, or want to seem more white, or just prefer their middle name over their first name, and that's okay--but they're not hiding it. They're not pretending like Past Them that was named something else is dead.
 
Pandering to the .1 percent while making the lives of the 99.9 percent more difficult. I’m sure it’s going to save twitter in the post-Trump era. Isn’t it funny that the only reason Twitter is still relevant is because of a white, cis, male republican president?

Druamph is in the middle of a push to have his transgender military ban thing implemented. He'll probably tweet about it at some point. He'll probably misgender someone when he does. If he doesn't, every troon on the platform will try to bait him into doing it. Whether or not he does, they'll mass report and screech.

If he does, though, or gets pissed enough to just go on a deadnaming rampage, that will be fantastic. Either they'll kick him off, and pure chaos will ensue, or they won't, and the troons will know Twitter really doesn't give a shit about them after all.

Either way, the chimping out will be delicious.

Nah. Twitter's not going to die any time soon simply because of the age-old problem that laziness and "sticking with the devil you know" go hand-in-hand.

That's what Myspace and AOL thought.
 
As long as people like Matt Yglesias get called a faggot again, I'm fine with this.
 
I wonder how easy it is to get someone banned for misgendering. Do you need any proof? Can you report any post that contains a pronoun and claim they misgendered that person?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: frozenrunner
Meghan Murphy is banned now

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/11/20/twitter-wants-shut-right-wants-join-dont-think-either/

The original offense was saying "men aren't women". The second strike was complaining about the suspension, it caught on and got a lot of retweets.
They didn't even attempt offering an explanation as to why her second tweet was offensive and just flat out told Meghan "REMOVE YOUR TWEET". I don't even :story:

At least this whole misgendering/deadnaming-is-literally-nazism-now poppycock is likely to lead to more people hitting peak trans. Because even in the "trans women are women trans men are men" crowd there is bound to be at least a few individuals who recognize the absurdity in having to call someone like Stephen Terence Wood/Karen White a woman or being banned for "misgendering" someone who uses emoji pronouns.
 
I remember twitter's statement about why they wouldn't ban Trump for threatening north Korea on twitter. If they banned him for dead naming after letting threatening nations slide... My sides would be ejected into orbit, oh my god.

It would make it really clear that troonery is now a cult religion that has turned into pure nuclear cancer.

I'm not sure if that's a mixed metaphor or just word salad but I'm keeping it.
 
Back