Pedophile support forum - Warning: sick fuckery ahead.

[whathefuckman]

Sometimes I ask myself when my mercy ends.

I'm of the opinion that pedophiles should first be chemically sterilized. However pedophiles with children or pedophiles who have done things to their own children should also have their copulating organ removed in order to deprive them of even the pleasure of orgasm to a fantasy.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Sometimes I ask myself when my mercy ends.

I'm of the opinion that pedophiles should first be chemically sterilized. However pedophiles with children or pedophiles who have done things to their own children should also have their copulating organ removed in order to deprive them of even the pleasure of orgasm to a fantasy.

You can orgasm without genitals.

Here's a description of a nullo's sex life, if you're curious:

Spoiler

http://forums.eunuch.org/showthread.php?26928-Achieving-Orgasm-as-a-Nullo

Its almost 18 months since I had my Radical penectomy and perinimum reroute done. Time passes very quickly. My excess skin is gradually retracting back were it belongs and life is good.
yes it is possible to Orgasm even as a nullo, only needs a different approach.
Before I would rub the area where my urethra exits, would take awhile and was nothing to write home about.
Now I have tried a different approach and all I can say is WHOA! I use my 3 middle fingers of my right hand and tap quickly and softly the same area. After awaile I get a strange sensation than a precum will start and if I keep going the dam busts.
The orgasm comes from inside and is completely different than what I use to have as a intact male.
Would be nice if everybody could have one just to feel the difference.
Do I reget not having a penis.... NO. I still love the look in a mirror and just see nothing.................
It was fuuny a while back with the wife.
During a long car ride, we both needed to pee.... She went first behind the bushes and then said you men have it easy...............
I answered Yes, some men do but I have to use the same bush as you, and she burst out laughing, saying I had forgotten that yours is just like mine...........

Take care all
best regards.

I agree about the chemical sterilization, though. Anything that would decrease their lust seems like a good thing.

 

[DarkResearchAnon]

One of the things about pedophiles is the absolute, disgusted, killing rage they inspire in people, and that is for a good reason, because that fuck stole that kid's life, and the kid ain't even dead yet. They're gonna grow up to do the same thing, and worse, become sexually fixated on that act. It never goes anywhere good. That and some of these kids end up as sex slaves at 14, sometimes sold off by their own parents, others for drugs.
It seriously makes me wonder if making a clean sweep with the machinegunning of the brothels isn't such an evil idea....

 

[Vyxenn]

It seriously makes me wonder if making a clean sweep with the machinegunning of the brothels isn't such an evil idea....

Or we could just machine gun the pedos

 

[queerape]

No you don't understand, the kids want to get fucked in the ass, I'm just helping them explore their sexuality. It's good for the children!

There's a documentary called "Chickenhawk" which is about why pedos do the things they do. I had a link to the documentary but I think it got DMCA'd. If I can find a new one, or if anyone else does, please post it.

It features interviews with real pedos and one of them explains how he justifies his actions and says something along the lines of what you just suggested. A lot of pedos are also CSA survivors who have normalized the abuse, and see it as part of growing up and they have neutralized the experience from hurting them by reframing it as a coming of age experience.

One thing I wonder is, why are pedos overwhelmingly male, if not exclusively so? Female ones do exist, but they seem to be vanishingly rare, outside the "teacher who fucked a 17 year old student" variety, what I mean is actual female pedos who want to diddle prepubescent children.

 

[queerape]

I'm of the opinion that pedophiles should first be chemically sterilized.

Many non offending pedos who are disturbed by their desires actually voluntarily undergo this or even full physical castration to prevent themselves from offending.

 

[wylfım]

One thing I wonder is, why are pedos overwhelmingly male, if not exclusively so? Female ones do exist, but they seem to be vanishingly rare, outside the "teacher who fucked a 17 year old student" variety, what I mean is actual female pedos who want to diddle prepubescent children.

And on today's episode of "controversial opinions other KF'ers might lynch me for:"
Men are unanimously more sexually deviant. Look at anything that strays from vanilla procreation, and males are vastly overrepresented: gays, trannies, paraphilias, even normal fetishes. I'm personally a fan of the variant male hypothesis, extended to sexuality— males are less important, so nature can take more of a risk on them, in the sense that, if it fucks up and you end up with someone that's never going to reproduce, the negative effects aren't as bad population-wise; if it succeeds it selecting for a sexual preference that may be beneficial (like a feeder fetish in a resource-scarce environment), then the benefits can be large.
reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

 

[queerape]

And on today's episode of "controversial opinions other KF'ers might lynch me for:"
Men are unanimously more sexually deviant. Look at anything that strays from vanilla procreation, and males are vastly overrepresented: gays, trannies, paraphilias, even normal fetishes. I'm personally a fan of the variant male hypothesis, extended to sexuality— males are less important, so nature can take more of a risk on them, in the sense that, if it fucks up and you end up with someone that's never going to reproduce, the negative effects aren't as bad population-wise; if it succeeds it selecting for a sexual preference that may be beneficial (like a feeder fetish in a resource-scarce environment), then the benefits can be large.
reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

That's interesting. If I'd have to hazard a guess specifically for pedophillia though, maybe it's because men in general tend to prefer younger women since fertility is more time limited, but women tend to prefer older men since they have more resources. Male pedophillia would be an extreme of the male preference, while daddy kinks in women are an exaggeration of the female preference.

 

[Sebben Crudele]

I have nothing to back up what I'm gonna say, but I always thought women were less likely to be pedophiles because it clashes with their primitive maternal instincts of protecting and caring for the youngest members of the group.

 

[Cleric of Autism]

There are pedo stars? Oh good lord

Yeah, one of the various Law and Orders did an episode on it, it was actually not that bad IIRC.

And another thing, I noticed one person use the term ephebophile, can we not? These people a pedophiles, don't let anyone forget that, or allow them to defend themselves in anyway by trying to to change the terminology.

 

[wylfım]

it was actually not that bad IIRC.

This is why God has abandoned us.
EDIT: It was super early in the morning and I can't read apparently, carry on...

 

[queerape]

Yeah, one of the various Law and Orders did an episode on it, it was actually not that bad IIRC.

And another thing, I noticed one person use the term ephebophile, can we not? These people a pedophiles, don't let anyone forget that, or allow them to defend themselves in anyway by trying to to change the terminology.

Ephebophillia means attraction to age 15-19, and that's at least over AoC in most places, if not fully legal as it includes 18 and 19 year olds. Most psychologists do not think it's pathological unless it disrupts the person's life. If it wasn't to some extent normal, then why are the "teen" and "barely legal" categories so big? Most of those people are fully developed anyways, so the distinction between it and teliophillia (attraction to 20-65 year olds) is more sociological in origin than physiological, and is thus more dependent on culture, which varies around the world.

Pedos are using the word totally wrong. Most of them would shudder at the thought of an 18 or 19 year old anyways.

 

[Sebben Crudele]

Pedos are using the word totally wrong. Most of them would shudder at the thought of an 18 or 19 year old anyways.

I guess they are using it right in the sense that it doesn't carry the same connotation as calling yourself a pedophile, because the word is less used and has less of an stigma associated with it?

 

[queerape]

I guess they are using it right in the sense that it doesn't carry the same connotation as calling yourself a pedophile, because the word is less used and has less of an stigma associated with it?

What I mean't is they've appropriated the term to use as a euphemism, and are using it differently than it was intended to be used.

 

[Midlife Sperglord]

Sexual deviancy group therapy is often effective if a person really wants to work with it. Somehow, I already knew going into this thread that was not what they meant by “support”.

 

[a feel]

One thing I wonder is, why are pedos overwhelmingly male, if not exclusively so? Female ones do exist, but they seem to be vanishingly rare, outside the "teacher who fucked a 17 year old student" variety, what I mean is actual female pedos who want to diddle prepubescent children.

That's a common misconception which is only recently being looked into. There are many female "pedos", although I would not, based on my limited knowledge of the subject, call them pedophiles in the same sense as males seem to be. From what I understand female child abuse and pedophilia does seldom come from an actual attraction to the child, it appears to be more a desire for power, sexual gratification and sheer sadism. One such example would be nuns, who were frequently known to abuse orphaned children within their care in multiple ways, including sexual (Sisters of Mercy, Bon Secours Sisters, etc.)

We only now learn about male children being subjected to sexual abuse by their female caretakers, too, which may be due to the still present social stigma of people going "lulz, u can't be raped by a wommenz" and "I wish she'd do ME", etc.

It's really a can of worms, and I honestly believe females are just as capable and guilty of pedophilia as males are. Maybe we're more subtle about it, or less aggressive in a way that a child perceives the abuse as something natural or even motherly when in reality it is not.

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

There are female pedos/predators out there, but there is also a disturbing amount of people who think women can't rape. (See how often it's reported that a female teacher is in trouble for "sleeping with" or "having sex with" a male student. If a male teacher had done that to a girl, nobody would think twice about calling it what it is, rape.)

People also think that males just always want sex, even as children, as seen below:

 

[a feel]

There are female pedos/predators out there, but there is also a disturbing amount of people who think women can't rape. (See how often it's reported that a female teacher is in trouble for "sleeping with" or "having sex with" a male student. If a male teacher had done that to a girl, nobody would think twice about calling it what it is, rape.)

People also think that males just always want sex, even as children, as seen below:
(snip)

I agree. It's moral nitpicking, kind of. There still appears to be an inherent belief that women cannot and do not rape or otherwise harm children, because that's just a thing "women don't do" (as opposed to men, who are drooling rapists barely being able to restrain themselves). I don't have any sources at hand right now, but I've been reading about female rape (of male and female children) every now and again out of morbid curiosity, and some of the key points were:

• women in general have easier and unrestricted access to children, which nobody questions
• inappropriate behavior is often downplayed and merely considered "motherly", even when the woman pays an alarming amount of attention to a child's genitals
• it's often the children who are blamed for "needing extra attention", and it's considered to be mostly normal when a woman shares a bed with children
• do I even need to mention the breastfeeding nuts who nurse their children forever? That's absolutely for their own sexual gratification

That said, women seem to also be a lot more subtle about the whole thing, and I yet have to see a forum of (legit) women writing about how they want to rape hoooooooooot lil boyz and girlz, which gives us the likely false impression that it's only men that do the abusing. Women are simply smarter about it, like they probably are with murder. They don't usually go on killing sprees that get them lots of attention, they quietly do their thing and often go unnoticed. Anyway, that's my theory.

Edit: I just realized I still don't know whether female pedos are actually attracted to children, like their male counterparts claim to be, or if it's all about power/sexual gratification/revenge fantasies for them. And I sure won't dig deeper than I already have to find out. Maybe there's a person out there who can provide some insight?

 

[wylfım]

I agree. It's moral nitpicking, kind of. There still appears to be an inherent belief that women cannot and do not rape or otherwise harm children, because that's just a thing "women don't do" (as opposed to men, who are drooling rapists barely being able to restrain themselves). I don't have any sources at hand right now, but I've been reading about female rape (of male and female children) every now and again out of morbid curiosity, and some of the key points were:

• women in general have easier and unrestricted access to children, which nobody questions
• inappropriate behavior is often downplayed and merely considered "motherly", even when the woman pays an alarming amount of attention to a child's genitals
• it's often the children who are blamed for "needing extra attention", and it's considered to be mostly normal when a woman shares a bed with children
• do I even need to mention the breastfeeding nuts who nurse their children forever? That's absolutely for their own sexual gratification

That said, women seem to also be a lot more subtle about the whole thing, and I yet have to see a forum of (legit) women writing about how they want to rape hoooooooooot lil boyz and girlz, which gives us the likely false impression that it's only men that do the abusing. Women are simply smarter about it, like they probably are with murder. They don't usually go on killing sprees that get them lots of attention, they quietly do their thing and often go unnoticed. Anyway, that's my theory.

Edit: I just realized I still don't know whether female pedos are actually attracted to children, like their male counterparts claim to be, or if it's all about power/sexual gratification/revenge fantasies for them. And I sure won't dig deeper than I already have to find out. Maybe there's a person out there who can provide some insight?

Women are less likely to be deviant in general. Lesbians are rarer than gay men (⅓ vs ⅔), FtMs are rarer than troons (⅓ vs ⅔), there are way less female sadomasochists than males (not sure exact ratio), etc etc. So probably there are female pedophiles who are attracted to kids, just rare, hence why we don't see them. I also don't think that women are smarter about it, because they aren't with other things— the murder example comes down to the fact that women are less aggressive. If you change the variance of trait distribution so men are higher variance, or you shift around the means for traits like aggression, then the distribution itself explains most of the differences we see. So I think that it ultimately just comes down to biological differences between men and women (gasp!)

 

[Mrs Paul]

Children of God?

Yep, that's the one.