- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
I’d like that to be explained as well.
There’s something I noticed that this degenerate fucker keeps doing to try and confuse matters where his animal molesting is concerned. He keeps throwing out the word “sentient” with regards to animals as if animals being sentient implies that they understand what’s going on well enough to be fucked by him and other sick pieces of shit like him.
The thing is, though, there’s a difference between a creature being sentient (being able to process and sense stimuli of different kinds, which animals are) and sapient (being able to think and reason apart from and not controlled by sheer instinct). Not the exact dictionary definitions but that’s the idea.
Animals are indeed sentient but they aren’t sapient, or at the bare minimum not to the degree humans are, so they can’t consent to sex acts with humans. Hell, even young children and mentally disabled people don’t have the full reasoning capabilities that normal adult humans do and that’s the reason we have ages of consent and laws regarding sexual contact with mentally impaired people. How the hell is raping animals any different in terms of the sentient/sapient divide? It’s really not and I’m disgusted but not surprised that this shitstain had child porn on his computer.
It’s super disturbing when Dogfucker Doug and his ilk pull the “ya know the gays used to be compared to pedophiles too” card. Um dude- two consenting adults getting it on regardless of how icky you find it is NOT the same as molesting helpless things that can’t say no and can’t fight back like animals AND kids. And no, just because the dog humps your leg or the kid sticks their hand in their pants because they’re curious about what’s down there, that doesn’t mean they’re asking for it. Jesus, this gross fuck. [rates self
because human garbage like this guy does make me mad]
