Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

How about misreporting campaign finances and swindling donors John, ever done that?

View attachment 611657
I want to call the a humble brag but I feel like it's really missing the "humble" part.

I also don't understand her method of unlocking characters in that game, since that's objectively not how it works. Which leads me to believe Brianna wasted an hour doing an unlock technique they misunderstood and didn't bother checking to clarify when it didn't work the first 15 tries.
 
I want to call the a humble brag but I feel like it's really missing the "humble" part.

I also don't understand her method of unlocking characters in that game, since that's objectively not how it works. Which leads me to believe Brianna wasted an hour doing an unlock technique they misunderstood and didn't bother checking to clarify when it didn't work the first 15 tries.

I imagine that Wu got really upset when his usual technique of throwing Frank's cash at it didn't get him the results he wanted. That hour wasted was Bri-bri looking for a credit card slot on the Switch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: valis and Ghostse
I invite you to take a gander at Wu's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brianna_Wu the warnings should tell you all you need to know.

"...considering the harassment Wu has faced, the presumption in favor of privacy almost certainly comes into play here..." - Wikipedia, exercising "neutral POV".

"We are all fighting a hard battle, but trans people assholes, scammers and con artists are fighting a harder battle than most." FTFY, John. Luckily, Wikipedia's got your back, and is actively abetting your subterfuge. Cuz they're woke af, and they know trannies are absolutely never shitty people who've left a trail of victims behind them.
 
Hey everyone drinks water, right? It should be water companies held accountable for human trafficking!

news.png
 
how does Wu get the power to control what's on his wikipedia if rock bands don't? it must be more than just having your own acct. some kind of inside-influence at wikipedia? wikipedia trannies?

There was a whole army of autistic zealots whose sole job was to micromanage every article remotely touching on GamerGate. They included multiple lolcows, including the notorious mega-autist Michael Cohen/Ryulong, whose frantic activities were so obviously corrupt he managed to cop a permaban even with Wikipedia's well-known bias.

There's also Wikipedia's bogus MOS:DEADNAME policy.
 
Hey everyone drinks water, right? It should be water companies held accountable for human trafficking!

View attachment 611832
I admit I don't have much knowledge on this subject, but surely most victims of sex trafficking do not have bank accounts? Why the hell would a sex trafficker make sure his victims--usually illegally-immigrated foreign women--set up personal local bank accounts, somehow under the women's own names despite the fact that they are not supposed to be in the country they are being sold in, only to immediately transfer the money out of their accounts to his own account? I am absolutely failing to see the logic in any of this.
 
I admit I don't have much knowledge on this subject, but surely most victims of sex trafficking do not have bank accounts?

This is just Al Capone stuff. You nail fat cats on tax evasion and money laundering. Works well enough, it's really hard to legalize piles of cash in modern world without taking a huge hit. That won't do shit for you street level pimps who deal in cash.

There's also Wikipedia's bogus MOS:biggrin:EADNAME policy.

Side note on this, I witnessed an interesting wikisperg over this policy related to a poet I know. Since before he started being a published author he always used a stage name. His real name is really goofy and he shares it with another well known poet, so I know why he went the way of a nick name. People on his page had a huge fight whatever to include his "deadname".

It only proved to me never to get into Wikipedia, I'm a semi-pro :autism: when compared to those champions.
 
Last edited:
I admit I don't have much knowledge on this subject, but surely most victims of sex trafficking do not have bank accounts? Why the hell would a sex trafficker make sure his victims--usually illegally-immigrated foreign women--set up personal local bank accounts, somehow under the women's own names despite the fact that they are not supposed to be in the country they are being sold in, only to immediately transfer the money out of their accounts to his own account? I am absolutely failing to see the logic in any of this.

Having never deposited a penny that he earned into a bank account and having never set up a bank account in his own name, John can easily be excused for having no fucking clue how the process works.

On the other hand, his idea that sex workers line up at the bank every morning to make cash deposits into their own private accounts paints an amusing picture yet to be seen in any JPMorgan Chase TV commercials.
 
Last edited:
I don't think that's the pattern sex traffickers use. Funneling large transactions through a small number of accounts, buying anonymous financial instruments with those accounts, and continuous large ATM withdrawals over the course of days from those accounts would seem likelier.

Of course, there are non-criminal activities that could be linked to such a pattern. It would require a lot of intrusion into financial privacy to distinguish that.

And the paranoid inside my brain says that's the exact point of this political push.
 
There's also Wikipedia's bogus MOS:DEADNAME policy.
As I recall, the woke Wikipedia writers tied Bruce Jenner's page into knots over the dead naming policy. Looking at it now it seems to have been smoothed out a bit. They actually reference the gender change and don't simply refer to "her" winning men's Olympic events.
 
Hey everyone drinks water, right? It should be water companies held accountable for human trafficking!

View attachment 611832
Yes, every sex worker has been saying it for decades! Every 'sex worker' that's an occasional tranny camwhore, anyway, and I'm sure that's qualification enough for them to tell trafficked women and kids what's right for them. Heaven forfend we attempt to protect women with no visa, passport, money, contacts or language skills who face beatings and rape every day (real beatings and rape, not misgendering on the internet). That shit gets in the way of middle-aged men in My Little Pony underwear sharing their beautiful womanhood with the world via Chaturbate. 'We'll get them through their bank accounts', jesus. Cos the first thing a trafficker does is set his girls up with a bank account and social security number each, I'm sure. No wonder these idiots think all hookers can unionise. These people have absolutely zero knowledge of trafficking or the sex industry.

But like every other issue they have zero knowledge about they'll happily talk about how to fix everything, because they're demanding the powers that be do the opposite of what they're doing now. No more, no less. If Trump said the grass was green, these people would claim it was blue and Trump was a nazi idiot for saying otherwise (complete with invented 'scientific' studies to prove their blue grass theories). Men are women, people who disagree with you are nazis, and unless you smile and be nice to everyone you're literally murdering minorities. John, like his sjw 'lefty' friends, believe in being contrary. It doesn't matter what the real issues are, just do what mum and dad those in power aren't. That's not politics, it's a temper tantrum.


Is it a good idea to admit you regularly break the speed limit, John? Between that and your 'backroad twisties in my Porche' comments, some may think you an irresponsible driver. I wonder how John would react if Stephen Lynch were to admit to dangerous driving?
 
How about misreporting campaign finances and swindling donors John, ever done that?

View attachment 611657

The stuff he lies about is just so weird. They're in Boston and none of those teams are blacked out locally.

And who says "spoofing my IP address"? You're using a VPN. His bizarre attempts to sound tech savvy always come across as pure cringe.
 
Wow, after the election I stopped reading this thread for awhile and yet even after skipping like 40 pages it's all the same in WU-land. I'm guessing I missed a couple of purchased and ruined Porsches, though.

Divided by what? People that wanted to become part of the Japanese empire?

View attachment 609366
No, we concentrated them in camps. But according to Wu we were united in doing it, and that's how we won WWII.
 
Glad to see Mrs Wu is woke on the (((banker))) question.
Ya know, I have mentioned this before but of all the various "woke" talking heads and celebrinobodies out there on tweeter, I think Wu is among the most likely to jump on board a hard right/fundie right/far right bandwagon the very moment she decides it will get her more influence and trendy asspats given Wu's history of flip flopping on literally every fucking thing she latches on to.

Im serious. I think within the next 5 years she will try and start a career as a "born again conservative" or some similar shit. First she will make some grand pronouncement on how "republicans are sometimes good" and then there will be some contrived drama with some twitter left winger who disagrees with her and she will then proclaim how she is being bombarded with rape threats for daring to speak her right wing thoughts and from there it all writes itself.
 
Im serious. I think within the next 5 years she will try and start a career as a "born again conservative" or some similar shit.
Well, as I'm fond of saying, dude's always been a solid Hillary Republican.
A more likely scenario than John becoming a full-on movement conservative is that the Republican Party absolutely craters itself and he tries to hop into the smoking wreckage as a founding member of "The NEW solutions-oriented Republican Party!" He can get his friends to commission some puff pieces in the media about the hip young (lol) tech-savvy up-and-comers turning the Republicans into a 21st-century party of Silicon Valley tech dudebros with hearts of gold. Frame it like an Ocasio-Cortez thing where they may be nominally party members but willing to rain down fire on their own leadership if they don't get their own goals met.

I don't see John making a huge ideological swing though, because one of his ground rules is that he won't associate with anyone willing to drop the F-bomb... that is, "Flynt".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Apteryx Owenii
Back