Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[Chuggernaut]

Shit, since my internship ran out and I wait for another one I do billing in a cube from 9-5 while waiting for either a crappy job in my field or another internship... More than Teej can say.

Speaking of which... are you hiring?

Sorry amigo. Besides, it would be quite the commute for you.

 

[big ol' idiot]

came across this goldmine of a thread today, must take some pretty serious assburgers to try and take down a thread for 4 years

 

[drtoboggan]

came across this goldmine of a thread today, must take some pretty serious assburgers to try and take down a thread for 4 years

TJ Virgin has nothing better to do with his meaningless life.

 

[Mr. X]

@Cowlick, has anyone ever straight-up punched you in the face?

I'm sure we could get Nate Spidgewood to emote-punch him.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@Cowlick I thought you would find this excerpt from our site's "Content Removal" section very informative...

 

[ON 190]

It always amuses me that Teej has dozens of people, and not just people on this site, tell him that his writing and grammar are rubbish but he thinks we’re all wrong and that only he is right.

 

[Pozzingmyfilthyneghole]

@Cowlick I thought you would find this excerpt from our site's "Content Removal" section very informative...

View attachment 615011

I wonder when he will return.

 

[ON 190]

I wonder when he will return.

Tonight or tomorrow, probably. Unless he’s busy jerking off to his own writing.

 

[Autism Man]

Tonight or tomorrow, probably. Unless he’s busy jerking off to his own writing.

Today is his birthday, but I doubt he's had anything planned.

 

[Cowlick]

I did celebrate with a lot of family. I have never jerked-off to writing by anyone, myself included. (Maybe that's one reason some of you don't like me, in addition to certainly being something we don't have in common.)

Also,...

@flossman , your observation in Post #9911 is wrong in several areas.

@ChurchOfGodBear , you may have only boldfaced the one section, but read the rest. It lists instances where threads have been removed, & does not claim those are the only instances in which it may happen.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Wow. I mean, that is a lack of reading comprehension.

Those bullet points are not A, B, or C. They list the extremely rare situations that are A, B, and C. Three parts of one specific situation. You are not a minor and thus do not even qualify for point A.

 

[Cowlick]

@NobleGreyHorse , you have no clue if they are parts of a situation & cannot be their own, nor how (if at all) rare they are.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I did celebrate with a lot of family. I have never jerked-off to writing by anyone, myself included. (Maybe that's one reason some of you don't like me, in addition to certainly being something we don't have in common.)

Also,...

@flossman , your observation in Post #9911 is wrong in several areas.

@ChurchOfGodBear , you may have only boldfaced the one section, but read the rest. It lists instances where threads have been removed, & does not claim those are the only instances in which it may happen.

I did not bold it, Null did when he posted it. This explains the conditions for removing a thread. You do not qualify.

 

[Cowlick]

They are not necessarily the only conditions under which it may be done, as I wrote before. Also, if this thread didn't qualify, why have so many posted in this thread they told me of ways it could be done, which would make it seem as though it did qualify?

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Literally what part of "one specific situation" [my emphasis] followed by A, B, and C [Null's emphasis] are you failing to comprehend? @flossman, I'll be needing some whisky, thanks in advance.

 

[AprilRains]

They are not necessarily the only conditions under which it may be done

On what authority do you claim this?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

On what authority do you claim this?

Indeed. When the motherfucker who runs the site and controls literally every word on it tells you how threads can go away, that's pretty definitive.

 

[Cowlick]

1] @NobleGreyHorse , I understand you are saying they are each parts of 1 specific situation, but as I wrote before, I bet whoever wrote those rules whenever they did didn't foresee the occurrence of the situations that led to threads being removed, but they happened. There is no way to be sure what will or will not happen in the future. nor what may result from those things.

2] @AprilRains & @ChurchOfGodBear , the same amount of authority any member here has. Also, @Null has been surprisingly silent on things as they pertain to me & the thread, etc. (There was an attempt to get him into a Conversation about it, but it failed.) So I'd say he is not unable to have anything changed regarding if, when, & how it may be removed. (Not to mention he continues to leave me labelled as his "Personal Hero &/or Best Friend" on all of my posts here.)

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

The "Personal Hero" thing is called a "custom title." Regular users may change their own. You can't, for the same reason you can't edit your own posts: that blue tag under your name. Moderators may change the custom titles of Verified users, so literally anyone who has been site staff in the past four years you've been on your Don Quixote quest could have dubbed you "Null's Personal Hero &/or Best Friend" in mockery -- especially of your renowned ampersand abuse.

"Whoever" wrote those rules? Null. Null writes the rules, especially about what content may remain on the site. Also, some threads have been hidden from public view or moved to a thread dump called "Spergatory," but not actually deleted. Would it satisfy your obsession if this thread were merely hidden from the public view and thus viewable only by registered users?

As for the future, since there are ten minutes remaining in your birthday, I could pull a Tarot card free of charge to find out what might happen. I think I know, though. Null is intensely stubborn and tenacious, and does not tend to be influenced by anything but his own decisions regarding this site. The decision to turn Amberlynn Reid's thread into an entire subforum, for example, was his own, and was not the result of a petition by any user or group of users. It came to his attention that the thread drew a disproportionate amount of traffic, and thus her subforum was born. (He has collapsed subforums before -- Russell Greer also used to have one -- but notably not deleted Greer's thread.)

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

1] @NobleGreyHorse , I understand you are saying they are each parts of 1 specific situation, but as I wrote before, I bet whoever wrote those rules whenever they did didn't foresee the occurrence of the situations that led to threads being removed, but they happened. There is no way to be sure what will or will not happen in the future. nor what may result from those things.

2] @AprilRains & @ChurchOfGodBear , the same amount of authority any member here has. Also, @Null has been surprisingly silent on things as they pertain to me & the thread, etc. (There was an attempt to get him into a Conversation about it, but it failed.) So I'd say he is not unable to have anything changed regarding if, when, & how it may be removed. (Not to mention he continues to leave me labelled as his "Personal Hero &/or Best Friend" on all of my posts here.)

Null does not have "the same amount of authority" as any other member here. He literally has ALL the authority. If he says that's the only way your thread gets deleted, there is no one else for you to appeal to.