- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
Uh... You might want to take a biology class at your local university.
That's called sarcasm, Brad.
Taking those statements literally is really autistic of you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh... You might want to take a biology class at your local university.
The only truly supermassive black hole around here is your dense skull, dude.Here's a depiction I found of our Universe inside a supermassive black hole. I tweaked the 1st sentence of Seal #1 this morning by replacing 'another universe' with 'our parent universe'. This term, 'parent universe', is very strong and is a paradigm shift in our understanding of our existence.
See http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com .
No and I don't know what the Epimenides paradox is. I strongly suggest that you read and study GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com .As a lurker, I not only read most of this thread, but also looked at your website. Now, my question doesn't have to do with the theory proper (I'll leave that to more qualified Kiwis), but with a particular application of that theory. If a group of seven people, four if you only count the most vociferous, claims that your theory is bogus, does your theory confirm that it is indeed invalid, as per the Epimenides paradox?
@GethN7 : Is that sarcasm? Don't answer that, I AM being sarcastic.The only truly supermassive black hole around here is your dense skull, dude.
More like 4 stars and 7 planetsI think the amount of autistic rage in this thread could fuel the birth of a new star.
The number 731 is just a normal number he says, but 4 and 7 are "special")."Yes, it's a whole number that falls between 730 & 732. Other than that, I don't know of any symbolic significance to it. 731 could be manipulated to be 73+1=74, but I wouldn't promote that, asshole.
You didn't study human neurology huh Dick? If you did, then you'd be aware that those with your brain disease experience a loss in matter when it manifests, with more deranged behavior being tied to a further loss.Uh... You might want to take a biology class at your local university.
Yes, but especially as a hobiday64 celebration on Independence Day 6/4. The bird people asked me to send you this message...4 and 7 are "special".
Brad, what do the bird people on the moon of Nestor eat? Worm pie?
Well, Richard is full of hot air so we're off to a good start.I think the amount of autistic rage in this thread could fuel the birth of a new star.
Hey, as long as you're now admitting Nestor is a fake Moon and not a fake planet, we start getting on the same page.@Adamska ,
You are clearly a poo-poo head.*
*Synchronism: 18:47 "Your brain changes as you get older." - ad on ABC
Yes, but especially as a hobiday64 celebration on Independence Day 6/4. The bird people asked me to send you this message...
Like I said, Brad, I've already read it- long before joining the farms.No and I don't know what the Epimenides paradox is. I strongly suggest that you read and study GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com .
I fear posting something more complicated than Ancient Aliens will only make Brad's brain short circuit and he'll go into some weird negative feedback loop until he just changes a single letter in his dollar-store drivel philosophy and proudly post the results as if anyone cared.Like I said, Brad, I've already read it- long before joining the farms.
Given that, I'd like an answer to my question: let's assume that God, as you claim, communicates through numbers- particularly the numbers 7 and 4. When seven (7) people spend significant amounts of time telling you that the theory is garbage- and four (4) of them are being particularly insistent- shouldn't the theory become a paradox, as the theory claims those numbers are used to communicate the divine truth of God, yet a group sized to match those numbers exactly tells you the theory is false? It's the Liar Paradox (from which the Epimenides Paradox is derived.)The Epimenides paradox is named after the Cretan philosopher Epimenides, who first posed the paradox. Academic Thomas Fowler explained it like this: "Epimenides the Cretan says, 'that all the Cretans are liars,' but Epimenides is himself a Cretan; therefore he is himself a liar. But if he is a liar, what he says is untrue, and consequently the Cretans are veracious; but Epimenides is a Cretan, and therefore what he says is true; saying the Cretans are liars, Epimenides is himself a liar, and what he says is untrue. Thus we may go on alternately proving that Epimenides and the Cretans are truthful and untruthful." (Sourced from The Elements of Deductive Logic (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 163.)
Yet, Epimenides cannot be both truthful and untruthful at the same time- they are mutually exclusive.
The Liar Paradox is similar to the Epimenides Paradox. Assume I say "This sentence is false." If "this sentence is false" is true, then the sentence is false, but if the sentence states that it is false, and it is false, then it must be true, and so on.
I fear you're right. Brad seems to follow the "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit" school of logic.I fear posting something more complicated than Ancient Aliens will only make Brad's brain short circuit and he'll go into some weird negative feedback loop until he just changes a single letter in his dollar-store drivel philosophy and proudly post the results as if anyone cared.
That or he'll pick a random post and go "that would be a great name for a band", since he's that mentally stunted.