Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
To answer your questions: long time lurker, but I officially joined back in December. I started to learn more about Chris-Chan, and stayed for the other cows. Your thread happened to be featured at the time, so I read a bit, was intrigued, and followed it for a while.
As a lurker, I not only read most of this thread, but also looked at your website. Now, my question doesn't have to do with the theory proper (I'll leave that to more qualified Kiwis), but with a particular application of that theory. If a group of seven people, four if you only count the most vociferous, claims that your theory is bogus, does your theory confirm that it is indeed invalid, as per the Epimenides paradox?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Here's a depiction I found of our Universe inside a supermassive black hole. I tweaked the 1st sentence of Seal #1 this morning by replacing 'another universe' with 'our parent universe'. This term, 'parent universe', is very strong and is a paradigm shift in our understanding of our existence.

See http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com .
The only truly supermassive black hole around here is your dense skull, dude.
 
As a lurker, I not only read most of this thread, but also looked at your website. Now, my question doesn't have to do with the theory proper (I'll leave that to more qualified Kiwis), but with a particular application of that theory. If a group of seven people, four if you only count the most vociferous, claims that your theory is bogus, does your theory confirm that it is indeed invalid, as per the Epimenides paradox?
No and I don't know what the Epimenides paradox is. I strongly suggest that you read and study GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com .

7 Continents and 4 Oceans.jpg

The only truly supermassive black hole around here is your dense skull, dude.
@GethN7 : Is that sarcasm? Don't answer that, I AM being sarcastic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
Yes, it's a whole number that falls between 730 & 732. Other than that, I don't know of any symbolic significance to it. 731 could be manipulated to be 73+1=74, but I wouldn't promote that, asshole.
The number 731 is just a normal number he says, but 4 and 7 are "special")."

Brad, what do the bird people on the moon of Nestor eat? Worm pie?
 
Uh... You might want to take a biology class at your local university.
You didn't study human neurology huh Dick? If you did, then you'd be aware that those with your brain disease experience a loss in matter when it manifests, with more deranged behavior being tied to a further loss.

Anyways, keep acting like a bootleg Two-face with your number autism; it keeps you nice and miserable at the utter lack of real power in your life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre
@Adamska ,

You are clearly a poo-poo head.*

poo-head.jpg


*Synchronism: 18:47 "Your brain changes as you get older." - ad on ABC

---------------------------​

4 and 7 are "special".

Brad, what do the bird people on the moon of Nestor eat? Worm pie?
Yes, but especially as a hobiday64 celebration on Independence Day 6/4. The bird people asked me to send you this message...

Fuck you.jpg
 
Last edited:
Since Dick did admit that our True and Honest take on Nestor is correct, then let's add number five:

The True and Honest Nestor
  1. Nestor is actually just a moon that orbits the 2nd planet of its solar system out towards the Sagittarius arm. Why? Because moon worlds are more interesting in a way and the fact that many exoplanets are gas giants makes this make more sense.
  2. Nestor, the moon orbiting around the 2nd planet (a gas giant) around its yellow dwarf star, is not inhabited by human-like aliens like Dick claims. The best way to describe a Nestorian is... well, they're a lot more akin to birds, but with long arm/legs ending in hand/talons instead and a long keratinized snout that may have once been crocodillian in nature long ago. Taxonomically, they have similar features to birds, feathering, hollow bones, and so on. But they're not quite like it since they do not have diapsid skulls and their eggs are not calcified and thus still soft; they evolved from something else.
  3. Nestorians get high on petrochemicals due to biological quirks that allow them to break down a few of them, mainly carbon gases, and often exploit thermal vents to both gain height and to get drunk off the fumes.
  4. Nestorians do not actually believe in a Christianity of any sort, given that not even radio broadcasts of sermons have reached them yet. Instead, many worship a pantheon of diverse deities that cover concepts as rich as fortune, joy, and sorrow. The chief god among most of them is an air god, the lord of winds and the skies. The most popular variant is loosely named Chalce. Besides this, there are small monotheistic sects following Chalce or a few charismatics, but they are in a minority.
  5. Nestorian diets vary a decent bit, ranging from a variety of pseudo-cereals to nuts and fruits for their plant based diets. The most noteworthy of these grains is the infamous stormsage, a plant whose berries are used in cakes, wines, and many desserts due to its unique taste. The plant's defense mechanism of emitting electrical pulses though makes it difficult to farm, leaving it a luxury food. In terms of meats, creatures similar to worms are fairly common, along with snakes and smaller hexapodal creatures that despite this feature are not arthropod-esque at all and closer to reptiles. Sea going Nestorians even catch strange fish for diets at times, but seafood is not a major element of their diet except in very few communities.
And since Dick could only retort with an ad hominem, then that means he knows I'm right and is just desperately trying to pretend that I'm not with that at best first grader tier insult. Might as well add that age also causes a shrinkage in the mind, and that if you don't actively keep it going by keeping it engaged the decline gets worse. Dick's ongoing problems are probably caused by said couch potato lifestyle since he doesn't try to keep his mind entertained beyond counting all the seven and fours he can, as if two out of our ten digits have meaning at all beyond a numerical and cultural value.
 
No and I don't know what the Epimenides paradox is. I strongly suggest that you read and study GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com .
Like I said, Brad, I've already read it- long before joining the farms.
The Epimenides paradox is named after the Cretan philosopher Epimenides, who first posed the paradox. Academic Thomas Fowler explained it like this: "Epimenides the Cretan says, 'that all the Cretans are liars,' but Epimenides is himself a Cretan; therefore he is himself a liar. But if he is a liar, what he says is untrue, and consequently the Cretans are veracious; but Epimenides is a Cretan, and therefore what he says is true; saying the Cretans are liars, Epimenides is himself a liar, and what he says is untrue. Thus we may go on alternately proving that Epimenides and the Cretans are truthful and untruthful." (Sourced from The Elements of Deductive Logic (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 163.)
Yet, Epimenides cannot be both truthful and untruthful at the same time- they are mutually exclusive.
Given that, I'd like an answer to my question: let's assume that God, as you claim, communicates through numbers- particularly the numbers 7 and 4. When seven (7) people spend significant amounts of time telling you that the theory is garbage- and four (4) of them are being particularly insistent- shouldn't the theory become a paradox, as the theory claims those numbers are used to communicate the divine truth of God, yet a group sized to match those numbers exactly tells you the theory is false? It's the Liar Paradox (from which the Epimenides Paradox is derived.)
The Liar Paradox is similar to the Epimenides Paradox. Assume I say "This sentence is false." If "this sentence is false" is true, then the sentence is false, but if the sentence states that it is false, and it is false, then it must be true, and so on.
 
Like I said, Brad, I've already read it- long before joining the farms.
The Epimenides paradox is named after the Cretan philosopher Epimenides, who first posed the paradox. Academic Thomas Fowler explained it like this: "Epimenides the Cretan says, 'that all the Cretans are liars,' but Epimenides is himself a Cretan; therefore he is himself a liar. But if he is a liar, what he says is untrue, and consequently the Cretans are veracious; but Epimenides is a Cretan, and therefore what he says is true; saying the Cretans are liars, Epimenides is himself a liar, and what he says is untrue. Thus we may go on alternately proving that Epimenides and the Cretans are truthful and untruthful." (Sourced from The Elements of Deductive Logic (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 163.)
Yet, Epimenides cannot be both truthful and untruthful at the same time- they are mutually exclusive.
Given that, I'd like an answer to my question: let's assume that God, as you claim, communicates through numbers- particularly the numbers 7 and 4. When seven (7) people spend significant amounts of time telling you that the theory is garbage- and four (4) of them are being particularly insistent- shouldn't the theory become a paradox, as the theory claims those numbers are used to communicate the divine truth of God, yet a group sized to match those numbers exactly tells you the theory is false? It's the Liar Paradox (from which the Epimenides Paradox is derived.)
The Liar Paradox is similar to the Epimenides Paradox. Assume I say "This sentence is false." If "this sentence is false" is true, then the sentence is false, but if the sentence states that it is false, and it is false, then it must be true, and so on.
I fear posting something more complicated than Ancient Aliens will only make Brad's brain short circuit and he'll go into some weird negative feedback loop until he just changes a single letter in his dollar-store drivel philosophy and proudly post the results as if anyone cared.
That or he'll pick a random post and go "that would be a great name for a band", since he's that mentally stunted.
 
I fear posting something more complicated than Ancient Aliens will only make Brad's brain short circuit and he'll go into some weird negative feedback loop until he just changes a single letter in his dollar-store drivel philosophy and proudly post the results as if anyone cared.
That or he'll pick a random post and go "that would be a great name for a band", since he's that mentally stunted.
I fear you're right. Brad seems to follow the "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit" school of logic.
 
"If the public knew their numbers, it would disturb them." - ad for the new program Vanished on History Channel, 19:48

--------------------------​

"The secret lies with Charlotte." - recurring line in the movie National Treasure (2004) now on History

This movie has the GOD=7_4 (704) Code all over it and it's about Freemasons - namely Benjamin Franklin - encoding the Declaration of Independence. The area code for Charlotte, NC is 704.

"The next time we find a treasure that changes all mankind, you..."

National Treasure.jpg
 
Back